Indeed, seems hosting was turned over to a family of midget snails <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif' /><!--endemo-->
The problem goes on and off, I have no clue why <!--emo&:(--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/sad-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
I've found this depends on what connection I'm using, for instance at home on my cable connection its fine, on my uni's connection is fine, however on a dsl line in my previous uni accomadation it took about 1-2 mins to load a single page, assuming it didnt time out first.
I dont think its related to how fast the connections are but just how or where they are connected to the internet.
<!--QuoteBegin-GiGaBiTe+Jul 24 2005, 12:03 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (GiGaBiTe @ Jul 24 2005, 12:03 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> someone probably needs to clean up the mysql tables, even though the topics are pruned, i can still access the 100th post made on the forum. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> I've often wondered how often they perform maintenance, and what exactly they do. <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/confused-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
I've experienced very slow speed here for about 2 weeks, although it's been sporadic of late. Go figure ...
devicenullJoin Date: 2003-04-30Member: 15967Members, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue
Same for me.. although it looks like savvis is resposible (they are part of the link from me to ns.org)
<!--QuoteBegin--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms router [192.168.1.1] 2 81 ms 14 ms 15 ms 69.0.81.254.adsl.snet.net [69.0.81.254] 3 14 ms 15 ms 16 ms dist1-vlan60.mrdnct.sbcglobal.net [66.159.184.22 6] 4 13 ms 14 ms 14 ms bb1-g8-0-0.mrdnct.sbcglobal.net [204.60.219.225]
5 16 ms 17 ms 17 ms bb1-p4-0.nycmny.sbcglobal.net [151.164.42.99] 6 16 ms 17 ms 23 ms ex1-p14-1.pxnyny.sbcglobal.net [151.164.41.135]
7 16 ms 18 ms 17 ms asn3561-savvis.pxnyny.sbcglobal.net [151.164.248 .82] 8 18 ms 18 ms 17 ms dcr3-ae2.NewYork.savvis.net [208.174.228.9] 9 16 ms 18 ms 17 ms bcs1-so-3-0-0-500.NewYork.savvis.net [204.70.192 .194] 10 49 ms 35 ms 24 ms bcs2-so-4-0-0.Washington.savvis.net [204.70.192. 1] 11 235 ms 273 ms 35 ms dcr2-so-7-2-0.Atlanta.savvis.net [204.70.192.57]
12 561 ms 60 ms 56 ms bcs1-so-3-2-0.Dallas.savvis.net [204.70.192.82]
13 56 ms 57 ms 56 ms bcs1-so-6-0-0.Dallas.savvis.net [204.70.192.49]
14 56 ms 56 ms 58 ms aer1-po10.DallasEquinix.savvis.net [204.70.134.1 4] 15 57 ms 58 ms 56 ms aer1-po10.DallasEquinix.savvis.net [204.70.134.1 4] 16 56 ms 59 ms 559 ms dist-vlan31.dsr3-2.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85. 127.30] 17 564 ms 57 ms 60 ms dist-vlan31.dsr3-2.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85. 127.30] 18 57 ms 56 ms 58 ms gig1-0-2.sm-car6-8.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.19. 255.158] 19 58 ms 60 ms 57 ms gig1-0-2.sm-car6-8.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.19. 255.158] 20 59 ms 57 ms 56 ms www.unknownworlds.com [67.18.232.194] <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Everyone else who's complaining, start->run cmd.. "tracert unknownworlds.com" See if savvis is in the tracert.. If we find out its savvis, it's something theplanet has to take care of
<!--QuoteBegin-GiGaBiTe+Jul 23 2005, 08:03 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (GiGaBiTe @ Jul 23 2005, 08:03 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->someone probably needs to clean up the mysql tables, even though the topics are pruned, i can still access the 100th post made on the forum.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> The topics actually aren't pruned. Go to any forum (try Off Topic), change the bar at the bottom to read "from the beginning", hit go, and browse the topics that were here in Feb 2002... Retrieving a post and grabbing a forum index are both very fast even with our full archive, so when that's all that is going on, performance is great. The main site issues right now are with the application and other programs stealing resources, not with the database; MySQL is not inherently slow even with massive amounts of data (see: <a href='http://slashdot.org' target='_blank'>/.</a>), but the forums aren't exactly the best tuned application in the world.
Current issues that are killing performance include: <ul><li>The search function, which doesn't scale well to the ~1.5 million posts currently on the site. A MySQL fulltext index based search fixes this, and we will be changing over to one ASAP</li><li>IPB admin functions, which are completely unoptimized and often result in joins over entire tables... MySQL can easily burn 60 seconds on some simple requests like moving a topic, and during those 60 seconds the site is slow for everyone. Once again, help is on the way.</li><li>The community mailer, which happens to be on the same machine and is a CPU hog when it has a long list to process... we'll eventually be moving outgoing mail to another box.</li><li>The automated backup system, which killed performance last week by completely filling the HD (yes, that was a stupid thing to do)</li></ul> I suppose it wouldn't hurt to publicly mention that we have bought an IPB 2.0 license, and I'm currently rewriting parts of the UWE front end to be 2.0 compatible. There is no ETA on the upgrade since I'm also doing contract work for UWE clients, but when it hits I'll be taking the site down for a few days to perform the database conversion and get everything set up. This is more than a simple swap of one forum for another; I'm rewriting sections of the site to be faster and more secure as I link them up to the revised forum code.
Using a fulltext search on IPB 2.0, it takes about half a second to get a search result over the lifetime of the entire site--the much faster response should help everybody's performance. From what I understand, the admin functions scale much better with 2.0 than they do with 1.3, so hopefully that will also get a boost.
To clarify, there are three things that I'm supposed to be working on at the moment: UWE client contracts (first priority), upgrading the site (and improving performance in the process), and Nexus. The NS team project schedule is completely separate from the UWE schedule, and currently has two tasks I'm not working on: NS and NS:S.
<!--QuoteBegin--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->I've often wondered how often they perform maintenance, and what exactly they do. <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/confused-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused-fix.gif' /><!--endemo--><!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
"They" is usually "Cagey", "when" is the intersection of "as needed" and "when I can" that amounts to several hours at a time about every other week, and "what" is usually tracking down the cause of a slow site and fixing it as necessary. There's a much larger set of changes coming, but I can't say when it will be delivered, and I'm sure the cynics among you will point out that project schedules around here aren't short. As much as I'd love the luxury of giving DBA or IT duties to a dedicated staff member, we're not a large enough company to afford that yet <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->.
caegy just thought, im not sure how much your following IPB's developement but at the current rate 2.1 is going to be out in a month or 2. There are some great new features in this including WYSIWYG posting system, inline editing (this absolutely rules for moderators saves about half the time). and perhaps more importantly a completely redone and reoptimised admin control panel 9for as far as i can tell the 2.0 admin control panel is exact;ly the same as 1.3) there maybe a few optimisations but if you want a more optimised admin control panel then 2.1 would be best. But, im sure you've probably notice 2.1 anyway
<!--QuoteBegin-Bry+Jul 25 2005, 04:22 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Bry @ Jul 25 2005, 04:22 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> caegy just thought, im not sure how much your following IPB's developement but at the current rate 2.1 is going to be out in a month or 2. There are some great new features in this including WYSIWYG posting system, inline editing (this absolutely rules for moderators saves about half the time). and perhaps more importantly a completely redone and reoptimised admin control panel 9for as far as i can tell the 2.0 admin control panel is exact;ly the same as 1.3) there maybe a few optimisations but if you want a more optimised admin control panel then 2.1 would be best. But, im sure you've probably notice 2.1 anyway <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> You're gonna make him cry <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Anyway, ty for the update and goodluck with the transfer, hope it goes as smoothley as it can <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Thanks for explaining things Cagey. Not only will it help viewers to understand the causes, perhaps it will also prompt them to properly place their posts. <!--emo&;)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wink-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
I'll have to mention IB 2.1 to prodigy as he's supposed to be upgrading to 1.3 soon.
i was wondering if the ns forums would ever be ported over to 2.x. ,its alot faster than the old 1.x series. even with a small board (modns.org) its very slow and buggy.
and the old posts are still there, hmm, i lost a file a long time ago. i wonder if that post i made about 1.5 years ago is still there, will hace to go dig that up.
i would think it would be a good idea to at least back up posts that are older than 6 months and are inactive, and move them to a seperate area for viewing. because even with 2.x, 1.5 million posts is alot to go through and still might slow it down.
<!--QuoteBegin-GiGaBiTe+Jul 26 2005, 02:10 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (GiGaBiTe @ Jul 26 2005, 02:10 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> i was wondering if the ns forums would ever be ported over to 2.x. ,its alot faster than the old 1.x series. even with a small board (modns.org) its very slow and buggy. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> Although prodigy has yet to upgrade modNS.org as he promised (rl PWNZ him right now), we have received no performance complaints from anyone. I for one have had no issues whatsoever with them.
Seems like Cagey's doing all he can here to remedy it. Kudos man.
We're still keeping an eye on this, I'm really not sure what's going on. We're not ignoring it though, I can promise you that. <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Comments
"Waiting for urlgoeshere..." For a long time.
I dont think its related to how fast the connections are but just how or where they are connected to the internet.
I've often wondered how often they perform maintenance, and what exactly they do. <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/confused-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
I've experienced very slow speed here for about 2 weeks, although it's been sporadic of late. Go figure ...
<!--QuoteBegin--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms router [192.168.1.1]
2 81 ms 14 ms 15 ms 69.0.81.254.adsl.snet.net [69.0.81.254]
3 14 ms 15 ms 16 ms dist1-vlan60.mrdnct.sbcglobal.net [66.159.184.22
6]
4 13 ms 14 ms 14 ms bb1-g8-0-0.mrdnct.sbcglobal.net [204.60.219.225]
5 16 ms 17 ms 17 ms bb1-p4-0.nycmny.sbcglobal.net [151.164.42.99]
6 16 ms 17 ms 23 ms ex1-p14-1.pxnyny.sbcglobal.net [151.164.41.135]
7 16 ms 18 ms 17 ms asn3561-savvis.pxnyny.sbcglobal.net [151.164.248
.82]
8 18 ms 18 ms 17 ms dcr3-ae2.NewYork.savvis.net [208.174.228.9]
9 16 ms 18 ms 17 ms bcs1-so-3-0-0-500.NewYork.savvis.net [204.70.192
.194]
10 49 ms 35 ms 24 ms bcs2-so-4-0-0.Washington.savvis.net [204.70.192.
1]
11 235 ms 273 ms 35 ms dcr2-so-7-2-0.Atlanta.savvis.net [204.70.192.57]
12 561 ms 60 ms 56 ms bcs1-so-3-2-0.Dallas.savvis.net [204.70.192.82]
13 56 ms 57 ms 56 ms bcs1-so-6-0-0.Dallas.savvis.net [204.70.192.49]
14 56 ms 56 ms 58 ms aer1-po10.DallasEquinix.savvis.net [204.70.134.1
4]
15 57 ms 58 ms 56 ms aer1-po10.DallasEquinix.savvis.net [204.70.134.1
4]
16 56 ms 59 ms 559 ms dist-vlan31.dsr3-2.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.
127.30]
17 564 ms 57 ms 60 ms dist-vlan31.dsr3-2.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.85.
127.30]
18 57 ms 56 ms 58 ms gig1-0-2.sm-car6-8.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.19.
255.158]
19 58 ms 60 ms 57 ms gig1-0-2.sm-car6-8.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.19.
255.158]
20 59 ms 57 ms 56 ms www.unknownworlds.com [67.18.232.194]
<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Everyone else who's complaining, start->run cmd.. "tracert unknownworlds.com"
See if savvis is in the tracert..
If we find out its savvis, it's something theplanet has to take care of
The topics actually aren't pruned. Go to any forum (try Off Topic), change the bar at the bottom to read "from the beginning", hit go, and browse the topics that were here in Feb 2002... Retrieving a post and grabbing a forum index are both very fast even with our full archive, so when that's all that is going on, performance is great. The main site issues right now are with the application and other programs stealing resources, not with the database; MySQL is not inherently slow even with massive amounts of data (see: <a href='http://slashdot.org' target='_blank'>/.</a>), but the forums aren't exactly the best tuned application in the world.
Current issues that are killing performance include:
<ul><li>The search function, which doesn't scale well to the ~1.5 million posts currently on the site. A MySQL fulltext index based search fixes this, and we will be changing over to one ASAP</li><li>IPB admin functions, which are completely unoptimized and often result in joins over entire tables... MySQL can easily burn 60 seconds on some simple requests like moving a topic, and during those 60 seconds the site is slow for everyone. Once again, help is on the way.</li><li>The community mailer, which happens to be on the same machine and is a CPU hog when it has a long list to process... we'll eventually be moving outgoing mail to another box.</li><li>The automated backup system, which killed performance last week by completely filling the HD (yes, that was a stupid thing to do)</li></ul>
I suppose it wouldn't hurt to publicly mention that we have bought an IPB 2.0 license, and I'm currently rewriting parts of the UWE front end to be 2.0 compatible. There is no ETA on the upgrade since I'm also doing contract work for UWE clients, but when it hits I'll be taking the site down for a few days to perform the database conversion and get everything set up. This is more than a simple swap of one forum for another; I'm rewriting sections of the site to be faster and more secure as I link them up to the revised forum code.
Using a fulltext search on IPB 2.0, it takes about half a second to get a search result over the lifetime of the entire site--the much faster response should help everybody's performance. From what I understand, the admin functions scale much better with 2.0 than they do with 1.3, so hopefully that will also get a boost.
To clarify, there are three things that I'm supposed to be working on at the moment: UWE client contracts (first priority), upgrading the site (and improving performance in the process), and Nexus. The NS team project schedule is completely separate from the UWE schedule, and currently has two tasks I'm not working on: NS and NS:S.
<!--QuoteBegin--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->I've often wondered how often they perform maintenance, and what exactly they do. <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/confused-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused-fix.gif' /><!--endemo--><!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
"They" is usually "Cagey", "when" is the intersection of "as needed" and "when I can" that amounts to several hours at a time about every other week, and "what" is usually tracking down the cause of a slow site and fixing it as necessary. There's a much larger set of changes coming, but I can't say when it will be delivered, and I'm sure the cynics among you will point out that project schedules around here aren't short. As much as I'd love the luxury of giving DBA or IT duties to a dedicated staff member, we're not a large enough company to afford that yet <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->.
There are some great new features in this including WYSIWYG posting system, inline editing (this absolutely rules for moderators saves about half the time). and perhaps more importantly a completely redone and reoptimised admin control panel 9for as far as i can tell the 2.0 admin control panel is exact;ly the same as 1.3) there maybe a few optimisations but if you want a more optimised admin control panel then 2.1 would be best.
But, im sure you've probably notice 2.1 anyway
There are some great new features in this including WYSIWYG posting system, inline editing (this absolutely rules for moderators saves about half the time). and perhaps more importantly a completely redone and reoptimised admin control panel 9for as far as i can tell the 2.0 admin control panel is exact;ly the same as 1.3) there maybe a few optimisations but if you want a more optimised admin control panel then 2.1 would be best.
But, im sure you've probably notice 2.1 anyway <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
You're gonna make him cry <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Anyway, ty for the update and goodluck with the transfer, hope it goes as smoothley as it can <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
I'll have to mention IB 2.1 to prodigy as he's supposed to be upgrading to 1.3 soon.
and the old posts are still there, hmm, i lost a file a long time ago. i wonder if that post i made about 1.5 years ago is still there, will hace to go dig that up.
i would think it would be a good idea to at least back up posts that are older than 6 months and are inactive, and move them to a seperate area for viewing. because even with 2.x, 1.5 million posts is alot to go through and still might slow it down.
Although prodigy has yet to upgrade modNS.org as he promised (rl PWNZ him right now), we have received no performance complaints from anyone. I for one have had no issues whatsoever with them.
Seems like Cagey's doing all he can here to remedy it. Kudos man.
-Charlie