The Numbers

2»

Comments

  • bonHommebonHomme Join Date: 2002-12-03 Member: 10424Members
    Great post kitsune, very informative. Still don't think there can ever be enough round to a magazine though...

    The fairness or usefulness of his results are a topic for another post

    and listen to discobird... the man took all that time to type his post, and edit it. Sound judgement there.

    <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif' border='0' valign='absmiddle' alt='biggrin.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • KitsuneKitsune Join Date: 2002-11-09 Member: 7843Members
    matso42 is correct, I found after some more experimenting, health damage <b>is</b> rounded down, which tosses a lot of my initial calculations right out the nearest window. Thanks to matso for pointing it out to me, and thanks to the P2P crew for being my guinea pigs for all the extra shooting I made them do.

    I'm working on revising the charts now. They aren't hugely altered; low-damage weapons like LMGs take an extra few shots to kill things, so the gist of the numbers is still accurate, and I'll be tweaking them to 100% accuracy as time permits. Unfortunately, there seem to be some bugs lurking in weapon damage that are making life difficult for me. The level 3 pistol should be doing 7/5.46 damage against a carapace 3 Kharaa, for example, but it only does six health damage. It also only does 25 damage to health rather than the 26 it should be doing, but even at 25 damage it should still be doing seven, not six, to health through armor. So I'm just confused now.
  • hoju2hoju2 Join Date: 2002-11-04 Member: 6873Members
    Only 5 shotgun blasts to kill an Onos? Only 2 to kill a Fade? Even though we are assuming a perfect hit these are still very incredible results. I read long ago that Shotguns were not worth there price with the HMG only a few RP's more but now when I am commanding I will be sure to hand out more Shotguns.

    Excellent work!
  • KitsuneKitsune Join Date: 2002-11-09 Member: 7843Members
    Okay, during the board's downtime, I've recalculated the damage and rewritten the statistic page. Basically, Kharaa are about 10% tougher than originally written, thanks to the weapon damage lost through being rounded down. Marines are mostly unaffected, though HAs can take a few more Lerk spikes than originally estimated. Also, I gave the shotgun a more accurate damage of half of the pellets hitting the target, since hitting the broad side of an Onos at point blank range only hits with eight. Tossed in a few more tidbits as well, so it should be more helpful a reference.
  • Anonymous_CowardAnonymous_Coward Join Date: 2003-08-15 Member: 19768Members
    Has anybody written an updated version of this analysis? It's sometimes difficult to find hard numbers to work with.
  • TeoHTeoH Join Date: 2002-12-30 Member: 11640Members
    ......


    gg threadcromancy.

    On a side note, certain people made themselves look rather silly in this thread, how entertaining.
  • RyoOhkiRyoOhki Join Date: 2003-01-26 Member: 12789Members
    I thought this thread looked familar....

    *blows dust off this ancient piece of forum archaeology*
  • criticaIcriticaI Join Date: 2003-04-07 Member: 15269Banned, Constellation
    Oh gg that was confusing!!! I was like <i>Why is this guy posting 1.03 statistics!?!?!!?</i>
  • Anonymous_CowardAnonymous_Coward Join Date: 2003-08-15 Member: 19768Members
    Hey, didn't mean to confound. <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif'><!--endemo-->

    I'll post a new thread rather than doing that ever again. Sorry.
  • StoneburgStoneburg Join Date: 2002-11-11 Member: 8174Members
    2.0x damage calculator:

    <a href='http://www.nonoobs.com/damage.php' target='_blank'>http://www.nonoobs.com/damage.php</a>
  • taboofirestaboofires Join Date: 2002-11-24 Member: 9853Members
    The calculator is not entirely accurate in the later 2.0x version. Quite frankly, it's impossible for it to be accurate in all 2.0x versions without a way of setting the version. Certain things have changed considerably.

    It seems correct about most things in 2.0 tho. I'm not sure about a few of the numbers (can someone confirm turret damage and onos gore damage for me? The calc has weapon level determine turret damage, btw.).
  • elchinesetouristelchinesetourist Join Date: 2003-06-29 Member: 17775Members
    interesting.

    Does this mean that D/M/S became vogue just before I started playing?

    Does this mean that, even then, people recognized the limitations of hive based evolutions?

    NS 1.0 had only been out a month then.. NS 2.0 has been out for more than a month. How fast time passes, how long ago that was. And yet when I first started NS was younger than 2.0 is now.
  • TeflonTeflon Join Date: 2003-08-27 Member: 20289Members
    Not to mention the nonoobs damage calculator is missing half the stats.
  • a_civiliana_civilian Likes seeing numbers Join Date: 2003-01-08 Member: 12041Members, NS1 Playtester, Playtest Lead
    edited September 2003
    <!--QuoteBegin--taboofires+Sep 17 2003, 11:46 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (taboofires @ Sep 17 2003, 11:46 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->It seems correct about most things in 2.0 tho.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Not the spore cloud though; it does 7 damage per half-second, not 6.

    <!--QuoteBegin--taboofires+Sep 17 2003, 11:46 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (taboofires @ Sep 17 2003, 11:46 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->can someone confirm turret damage and onos gore damage for me?<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    I can confirm that the Onos gore does 90 damage.
  • MajinMajin Join Date: 2003-05-29 Member: 16829Members, Constellation
    I hate it when someone brings up an old thread like that.
    it always throws me way off when I read it and am like 1.3?<!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/confused.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused.gif'><!--endemo-->
Sign In or Register to comment.