Imageshack hosting -- adware, spyware, malware?

Josh86Josh86 Join Date: 2010-12-06 Member: 75513Members
edited March 2011 in NS2 General Discussion
I've noticed a lot of you post screenshots or images that are hosted on imageshack. I sometimes forget before I click and regret, but, has anyone else ever noticed the adware pop-ups that almost always seem to happen? I hate that crap and always end the process rather than click anything, just to be sure. I know imageshack had problems years ago with this kind of stuff and I was just wondering if you guys just deal with it or what (maybe you all run pop-up blocker plug-ins). If it's not me -- ever considered using a different hosting website for your images?

<i>edit: It seems like some images are ok...direct links to larger full view images have no issues. I've clicked smaller thumbnail images that users have embedded and the links take me to the imageshack page, where the pop-ups happen.</i>

I'm pretty sure I don't have *ware on my laptop. I try to run a lean machine and visit few websites. I'm very memory/process conscious -- I also use Spybot, Malwarebytes, and we have software on our machines via work.

Aside: Anyone else, like me, run Internet Explorer mostly now? I always used Firefox until Explorer caught up...now it seems like Firefox is the one that crashes more :P. I haven't noticed if Imageshack gives me pop-ups with Firefox.

Comments

  • Alpha.Alpha. Join Date: 2011-01-04 Member: 76186Members
    IE is still the slowest
  • Raza.Raza. Join Date: 2004-01-24 Member: 25663Members, Constellation
    I know what you mean, but I have Firefox with Adblock so I don't notice it.

    <!--quoteo(post=1835687:date=Mar 2 2011, 11:39 PM:name=Alpha.)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Alpha. @ Mar 2 2011, 11:39 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1835687"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->IE is still the slowest<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    Not true at all. IE loads pages considerably faster than Firefox on all my PCs, especially images.
    I only use FF because of Adblock. :P
  • ScardyBobScardyBob ScardyBob Join Date: 2009-11-25 Member: 69528Forum Admins, Forum Moderators, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Shadow
    I'd say Imagehost is angerware. It makes me angry when someone uses it.
  • HarimauHarimau Join Date: 2007-12-24 Member: 63250Members
    I use IE primarily; but I use Firefox for the plugins (for specialist roles).
  • ZurikiZuriki Join Date: 2010-11-20 Member: 75105Members
    edited March 2011
    <!--quoteo(post=1835719:date=Mar 3 2011, 02:19 AM:name=ScardyBob)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ScardyBob @ Mar 3 2011, 02:19 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1835719"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I'd say Imagehost is angerware. It makes me angry when someone uses it.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Oh god yes.

    Internet Explorer is still absolutely ######. It's an abomination, I use Chrome because so far it's the only one hackers were unable to break into.
  • Josh86Josh86 Join Date: 2010-12-06 Member: 75513Members
    edited March 2011
    Just to clarify, the image hosting website I referred to was <b>imageshack</b>, not imagehost. I see that imagehost's service has been shut down but existing uploads may still be functional -- I've never heard of them before but I'll make sure to avoid them.

    I don't have any issues with the newer versions of IE. My past browser problems only stemmed from things like flash/javascript errors or hangups in the process -- which some of the time isn't the browser's fault...but the software/code trying to run on it. Things like adware, spyware, etc...while browser configurations or they way they are programmed can make them susceptible -- it's really dependent on how well you code your page, who your host is, and what measures they offer for security.

    All browsers are susceptible toward something malicious, Chrome is relatively new -- give it time, but for your browser to get corrupted or "hacked" as said -- you must have exposed yourself to that malicious code (whether its leaving ports open, not taking proper security precautions, or getting *ware from somewhere).

    Places that often offer free file hosting like imageshack make money through advertising, I'm sure -- the admins of such websites may be no more than a small group of people (or even one!) that pay a host and buy storage space. Some advertising is bad...it's important that hosts are told that malicious advertising is present on one of the websites they serve. Imageshack <b>appears</b> to be more than a small outfit, they probably have their own servers, but that doesn't mean the advertising they allow on their page is policed very well. Like I said, it appears that thumbnail links embedded here to user's galleries result in pop-ups. I know this was a problem in the past, as well. It's not their fault, but they need to do a better job filtering out malicious advertising.

    I know if I were looking to get malicious advertising out there, I would go to websites that host media content, social networking sites, porn sites, etc...these are places that are frequently visited. Some places just do a better job keeping the advertising safe and clean for users like you and me.
  • Alpha.Alpha. Join Date: 2011-01-04 Member: 76186Members
    Jeez, guys, how can you use IE when theres Opera and FF?
  • zexzex Join Date: 2009-10-07 Member: 68978Members
    <!--quoteo(post=1835804:date=Mar 3 2011, 07:34 PM:name=Josh86)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh86 @ Mar 3 2011, 07:34 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1835804"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->My past browser problems only stemmed from things like flash/javascript errors or hangups in the process -- hich some of the time isn't the browser's fault...but the software/code trying to run on it. Things like adware, spyware, etc...while browser configurations or they way they are programmed can make them susceptible -- it's really dependent on how well you code your page, who your host is, and what measures they offer for security.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    You answered your own question in the OP. You're having problems because you use IE. Even though the problem is caused by software/code, the real issue is that your browser (IE) ALLOWS that software/code to be executed, whereas better browsers don't allow it, and therefore people not using IE have no problem.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Join Date: 2011-02-17 Member: 82258
    Guys, guys - it's <i>all</i> about Chrome.
  • zexzex Join Date: 2009-10-07 Member: 68978Members
    edited March 2011
    <!--coloro:#FFA500--><span style="color:#FFA500"><!--/coloro-->Don't evade the swear filter<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--> Chrome, I uninstalled it as soon as I got a random popup asking if I wanted to update to the latest version... when the program wasn't even open and I hadn't used it for weeks. There's some good browsers that use Chrome's open source code, though.
  • DeadzoneDeadzone Join Date: 2003-07-03 Member: 17911Members, Reinforced - Shadow
    edited March 2011
    <!--quoteo(post=1835858:date=Mar 3 2011, 08:57 PM:name=zex)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (zex @ Mar 3 2011, 08:57 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1835858"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->You answered your own question in the OP. You're having problems because you use IE. Even though the problem is caused by software/code, the real issue is that your browser (IE) ALLOWS that software/code to be executed, whereas better browsers don't allow it, and therefore people not using IE have no problem.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    This isn't entirely true. I've gotten similar warnings from Imageshack while on firefox. No browser keeps you 100% safe, and even if yours IS really cool, why would you go to a risky website?

    photobucket ftw
  • peregrinusperegrinus Join Date: 2010-07-16 Member: 72445Members
    Never had problems with imageshack. You can try imgur that's awesome.

    (use chrome)
  • LoeyLoey Join Date: 2009-10-31 Member: 69187Members
    i use noscript plugin for firefox and nothing runs by default unless i allow it. have not had a pop up problem yet with any site
  • haymohaymo Join Date: 2005-01-09 Member: 34040Members, NS1 Playtester
  • ShiloriusShilorius Join Date: 2011-01-14 Member: 77445Members, Reinforced - Shadow
    Yeah, use Chrome and get your ass stalked by google. ;)

    anyway btt.
    The best way to use imageshack is to use the direct link to the picture, as OP said.


    (Firefox ftw)
  • Alpha.Alpha. Join Date: 2011-01-04 Member: 76186Members
    <!--quoteo(post=1835926:date=Mar 4 2011, 11:36 AM:name=Shilorius)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Shilorius @ Mar 4 2011, 11:36 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1835926"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->(Firefox ftw)<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    You mean Opera ftw, right? :]
  • SpaZSpaZ Join Date: 2003-06-11 Member: 17256Members
    Chrome all the way. Just used Firefox for Quake Live and now it works on Chrome too so.
  • ScardyBobScardyBob ScardyBob Join Date: 2009-11-25 Member: 69528Forum Admins, Forum Moderators, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Shadow
    <!--quoteo(post=1835804:date=Mar 3 2011, 10:34 AM:name=Josh86)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Josh86 @ Mar 3 2011, 10:34 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1835804"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Just to clarify, the image hosting website I referred to was <b>imageshack</b>, not imagehost. I see that imagehost's service has been shut down but existing uploads may still be functional -- I've never heard of them before but I'll make sure to avoid them.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    Imageshack, Imagehost, Imagemakesmeangry, the name doesn't matter, they all suck. Imgur is pretty good. I personally like dropbox because I can host more than just pictures there. Photobucket is ok, but if I'm posting pictures its because I want a clean, direct link to it, not to some random gallery with junk.
  • DJPenguinDJPenguin Useless Join Date: 2003-07-29 Member: 18538Members
  • zastelszastels Join Date: 2003-11-29 Member: 23731Members
    Little tip about imageshack and direct links.

    They only let you see the direct link if you register, however if you just right click the picture, copy the link, paste it into a new tab, then right click copy the link, you have the direct link to the image.

    Magicshack ; )
  • DJPenguinDJPenguin Useless Join Date: 2003-07-29 Member: 18538Members
    <!--quoteo(post=1847385:date=May 19 2011, 02:00 PM:name=zastels)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (zastels @ May 19 2011, 02:00 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1847385"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Little tip about imageshack and direct links.

    They only let you see the direct link if you register, however if you just right click the picture, copy the link, paste it into a new tab, then right click copy the link, you have the direct link to the image.

    Magicshack ; )<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    isn't that common knowledge
  • IeptBarakatIeptBarakat The most difficult name to speak ingame. Join Date: 2009-07-10 Member: 68107Members, Constellation, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, NS2 Map Tester, Reinforced - Diamond, Reinforced - Shadow
    <a href="http://imgur.com/" target="_blank">http://imgur.com/</a> Is my preferred image hosting site.
Sign In or Register to comment.