cpu - amd quad core 955 black edition at 3.2 non o/c 8 gigs gskill ram gtx 470 gpu
1920x1080
average around 50 fps, waiting on my new parts to arrive
i7 3770k
wonder what kinda boost itll offer if any, its mostly for future games. and holy shi necro, how do you play on an 8800 gts. i used to have that card when bad company 2 came out and i had to upgrade because the fps were so bad. how in the world do you get that many fps lol. oh wait nvm forgot how much is cpu in ns2. but still.
Kouji_SanSr. Hινε UÏкεεÏεг - EUPT DeputyThe NetherlandsJoin Date: 2003-05-13Member: 16271Members, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue
edited December 2012
<ul><li>Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bits</li><li>i5 2500K @ 4.2Ghz</li><li>HD5870 1Gb</li><li>16Gb DDR3-1600</li><li>1600x900 Windowed, Double buffering V-Sync (I hate to adjust to the ups and downs in the FPS with it set to off :( )</li><li>High, Particles low (High when streaming), Infestation minimal (rich when streaming)</li><li>FXAA on, Bloom on, Atmospherics off (on when streaming), Anisotropic on, shadows on, AO off, Texture Streaming off, MT on</li></ul>
<ul><li>Strolling around the map: 85-100FPS (with V-sync off), 60 with double buffered V-Sync</li><li>Combat: 58-90FPS (with V-sync off), 58-60 with double buffered V-Sync</li><li>Heavy Combat: 45-55FPS</li><li>Super Heavy Combat: 30-40FPS</li></ul>
You can take away 5-10FPS from all of them when I'm streaming or 2-5 FPS when recording with DXtory
-Windows 8 Pro 64bit -2500K @ 4.5ghz -ASUS P8P67 -GTX670 2GB -Corsair Dominators 8GB DDR3 1600 -Corsair ForceGT 120GB (NS2 is on this) -WD Caviar Black 1TB -HT Omega Claro Halo -Dell U2410
I play at 1920x1200 with no vsync and everything on low except Texture Quality, Particle Quality, and AF which are all at high. I'll take another bench at max but I find it's just easier to see with everything turned off. The only mod I use is white dot crosshair.
I took a Fraps benchmark instead of guessing like everyone else.
Win7 Pro i72600K OC'ed to 4.5 Ghz 16GB DDR3 OC'ed to I can't remember 128gb intel SSD 2 x 1tb Western Digital Caviar Black in raid 0 2 x GTX 680 SLI
I've seen up to 200fps but that tends to heat my cards up pretty fast so I just lock them to 90fps and they stay around 50c. FPS can go down to about 45 if i'm looking around really fast with a lot of stuff going on but I've never seen it go below that.
Fraps benchmark put me at max 201, average 132.625, and min 56. So not too bad I suppose, the drops were when picking teams and junk.
20-30fps at the low end in super intense combat with explosions etc. Up to 130fps+ 1440 x 900 resolution all graphics set to max
I rarely get in situations where fps gets low enough to the point where it is annoying but it does happen. Although I could lighten up on the graphics settings a bit :)
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2GHz & 4GHz Radeon HD 6950 & 1GHz CORSAIR DOMINATOR GT (2 x 2GB) DDR3 1866 Liquid cooling for teh 0\/0rc10x omg
I can play all maxed out fine (except AO.. never turned it on). If i want heavy endgame with lots of action to not lower fps so much that i can feel it... i lower shadows and particels.
<!--quoteo(post=2051968:date=Dec 27 2012, 09:53 PM:name=VeNeM)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (VeNeM @ Dec 27 2012, 09:53 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2051968"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->and holy shi necro, how do you play on an 8800 gts. i used to have that card when bad company 2 came out and i had to upgrade because the fps were so bad. how in the world do you get that many fps lol. oh wait nvm forgot how much is cpu in ns2. but still.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Heh. :D I was surprised too. I upgraded my pc nearly a year ago (with a SSD and all the new stuff), but kept my old graphic card. I want to buy a new one as soon as it is necessary. But until now I'm fine with it. I think the i5 does this magic. With the resolution of 1280x768 the waiting for gpu sticks mostly between 4 and 6ms. But I can't play it on my native resolution.
I don't want anyone to think I'm braggy braggerson because I'm posting this, but it does feel pretty good to buy almost the best possible computer. Most of you would post it if you had it.
Rig posted above. 18 players. 1920x1200. All settings max except FXAA=off and Ambient Occlusion=off I can't play with FXAA on because it blurs the whole screen and makes me eyes feel constantly out of focus.
<!--quoteo(post=2052139:date=Dec 27 2012, 09:24 PM:name=SixtyWattMan)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SixtyWattMan @ Dec 27 2012, 09:24 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2052139"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->All posts that are not Fraps benchmarks are worthless.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This is very true. There are enough factors without people making guesstimates. FPS will vary depending on game-length, server size, which team you are playing, how often you die, which map you played on.
Kouji_SanSr. Hινε UÏкεεÏεг - EUPT DeputyThe NetherlandsJoin Date: 2003-05-13Member: 16271Members, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue
edited December 2012
<!--quoteo(post=2052404:date=Dec 28 2012, 07:04 PM:name=Desther)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Desther @ Dec 28 2012, 07:04 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2052404"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->This is very true. There are enough factors without people making guesstimates. FPS will vary depending on game-length, server size, which team you are playing, how often you die, which map you played on.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> Nah, I know the average FPS I get and posting a range is just as "accurate" as a snapshot of one round on a map, just less fancy.
[edit] I mean with the huge difference between the systems in here, and some oddballs of High end, low performance. It still is only a guesstimate...
<!--quoteo(post=2052449:date=Dec 28 2012, 03:43 PM:name=Kouji_San)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kouji_San @ Dec 28 2012, 03:43 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2052449"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Nah, I know the average FPS I get and posting a range is just as "accurate" as a snapshot of one round on a map, just less fancy.
[edit] I mean with the huge difference between the systems in here, and some oddballs of High end, low performance. It still is only a guesstimate...<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> No. The numbers you come up with in your head are not as accurate as the ones recorded by software. Also, you would be surprised by the number of people that flat out lie about their FPS numbers or spew vitriol like, "well it feels like im getting 60fps."
Kouji_SanSr. Hινε UÏкεεÏεг - EUPT DeputyThe NetherlandsJoin Date: 2003-05-13Member: 16271Members, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue
edited December 2012
<!--quoteo(post=2052459:date=Dec 28 2012, 08:59 PM:name=SixtyWattMan)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SixtyWattMan @ Dec 28 2012, 08:59 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2052459"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->No. The numbers you come up with in your head are not as accurate as the ones recorded by software. Also, you would be surprised by the number of people that flat out lie about their FPS numbers or spew vitriol like, "well it feels like im getting 60fps."
Fraps or get out.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> Got me some FPS counter up on the top corner all the time (DXtory FPS counter) and I'm always keeping my eye on that during any part of the a round so I know if I need to over compensate or under compensate my aiming. I also take mental note each build about the Lowest and Highest FPS in all three situation I posted. I don't need not program to tell me what FPS I'm getting afterwards...
<!--quoteo(post=2052488:date=Dec 28 2012, 05:38 PM:name=Kouji_San)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kouji_San @ Dec 28 2012, 05:38 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2052488"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Got me some FPS counter up on the top corner all the time (DXtory FPS counter) and I'm always keeping my eye on that during any part of the a round so I know if I need to over compensate or under compensate my aiming. I also take mental note each build about the Lowest and Highest FPS in all three situation I posted. I don't need not program to tell me what FPS I'm getting afterwards...<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> Your mind is not capable of recording as accurately as a computer.
All low + very odd resolution of 1280x600 (got black stripes on top and bottom of the screen, don't use such resolution anywhere else >_<)
About 50 in early game (love early game), more like 20-25 late game and if aliens dominate (hence crags, shades, eggs, shifts and whips in every room, tons of them) it drops to like 10-15 :(
Tho I'm used to it, had outdated rigs for about 15 years now :D When I buy a new pc/laptop, it's already mid-tier, and then I use it for few years (not a gamer much). So, I consider 30 fps fine for playing.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> hi, for me:
all low, resolution of 1280*720 or lower to 800*600 (5fps more) early game 50 right, 20-30 in alien front of one ennemi 10 15 in late game in human immediatly 20-25, then 15 main game and 5-10 late game
I have activated optimus and follow all tips for improve performances.
WTF with this ? r_stats 1 send me : "waiting for gpu:0" so my frame rate deal with my processor, a i5 2,4ghz boosting to 3 ghz is more powerful than a core duo 2,4, no ? :D
so what can I do ? I only want a small minimal 20 fps, a 25-30 fps to play is fine for me, even in minimal graphic. any idea ??
<!--quoteo(post=2052500:date=Dec 28 2012, 02:54 PM:name=SixtyWattMan)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SixtyWattMan @ Dec 28 2012, 02:54 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2052500"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Your mind is not capable of recording as accurately as a computer.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Your mind is not capable of admitting you're wrong.
I have this handy G19 keyboard with a little color LCD screen on it and a graph, I'm constantly monitoring my FPS along with my video card speed, usage %, Voltage, Heat, and fan speed.
But oh look I can turn a csv file into a chart yipee...
Here are the results I have for a system that I built almost two years ago, and even then it was considered mid-range:
I created a totally unrealistic scenario: spawned 10 exos, 10 regular marines, 6 or so onos, 8 or so fades, 6 or so skulks, and 8 or so lerks all in the data core hive room in ns2_summit with full infestation. In addition, I also dropped about 20 crags, a few shifts (and maxed out their egg deployment) and all upgrades. I then went lerk and spammed spores and umbra all over the room. All graphic settings are at their maximum. Tried with and without shades to stealth all of the aliens.
Try as I might, I couldn't get the FPS to drop below 33 (measured with fraps.) Here are my specs:
As I stated earlier, this isn't exactly a high end system, and 33fps isn't bad at all, and given how unrealistic of a scenario I created, I can't see it staying that low on a regular basis. I'm also running windows 8 (with metro apps removed) if that matters to anybody.
<!--quoteo(post=2052632:date=Dec 28 2012, 10:10 PM:name=Davil)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Davil @ Dec 28 2012, 10:10 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2052632"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Your mind is not capable of admitting you're wrong.
I have this handy G19 keyboard with a little color LCD screen on it and a graph, I'm constantly monitoring my FPS along with my video card speed, usage %, Voltage, Heat, and fan speed.
But oh look I can turn a csv file into a chart yipee...
And surprise surprise it's pretty much exactly representative of what I said earlier.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm right though. Why would I say I'm wrong? Why even make or post in the thread if all we are going to get is people's estimates of what they might be getting? It's completely pointless to capture inaccurate information.
<!--quoteo(post=2052650:date=Dec 28 2012, 08:01 PM:name=SixtyWattMan)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SixtyWattMan @ Dec 28 2012, 08:01 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2052650"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I'm right though. Why would I say I'm wrong? Why even make or post in the thread if all we are going to get is people's estimates of what they might be getting? It's completely pointless to capture inaccurate information.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
here's the thing about that, anyone can make a chart do whatever they want, want to see me make one saying 500fps the entire time? You are wrong because the only thing that really matters is the integrity of the person posting. Some guys like Kouji you can trust.
<!--quoteo(post=2052652:date=Dec 28 2012, 11:12 PM:name=Davil)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Davil @ Dec 28 2012, 11:12 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2052652"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->here's the thing about that, anyone can make a chart do whatever they want, want to see me make one saying 500fps the entire time? You are wrong because the only thing that really matters is the integrity of the person posting. Some guys like Kouji you can trust.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--quoteo(post=2052663:date=Dec 28 2012, 09:49 PM:name=Davil)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Davil @ Dec 28 2012, 09:49 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2052663"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Well thankfully no one else seems to agree with your opinion so have a nice day.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Its people like you that gives me a small slimmer of hope for humanity.
Comments
8 gigs gskill ram
gtx 470 gpu
1920x1080
average around 50 fps, waiting on my new parts to arrive
i7 3770k
wonder what kinda boost itll offer if any, its mostly for future games. and holy shi necro, how do you play on an 8800 gts. i used to have that card when bad company 2 came out and i had to upgrade because the fps were so bad. how in the world do you get that many fps lol. oh wait nvm forgot how much is cpu in ns2. but still.
<ul><li>Strolling around the map: 85-100FPS (with V-sync off), 60 with double buffered V-Sync</li><li>Combat: 58-90FPS (with V-sync off), 58-60 with double buffered V-Sync</li><li>Heavy Combat: 45-55FPS</li><li>Super Heavy Combat: 30-40FPS</li></ul>
You can take away 5-10FPS from all of them when I'm streaming or 2-5 FPS when recording with DXtory
-2500K @ 4.5ghz
-ASUS P8P67
-GTX670 2GB
-Corsair Dominators 8GB DDR3 1600
-Corsair ForceGT 120GB (NS2 is on this)
-WD Caviar Black 1TB
-HT Omega Claro Halo
-Dell U2410
I play at 1920x1200 with no vsync and everything on low except Texture Quality, Particle Quality, and AF which are all at high. I'll take another bench at max but I find it's just easier to see with everything turned off. The only mod I use is white dot crosshair.
I took a Fraps benchmark instead of guessing like everyone else.
2012-12-27 14:24:55 - ns2
Frames: 86684 - Time: 916375ms - Avg: 94.594 - Min: 0 - Max: 171
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/RdYAM.png" border="0" class="linked-image" />
The Min: 0 is from opening the menu by accident I think.
i72600K OC'ed to 4.5 Ghz
16GB DDR3 OC'ed to I can't remember
128gb intel SSD
2 x 1tb Western Digital Caviar Black in raid 0
2 x GTX 680 SLI
I've seen up to 200fps but that tends to heat my cards up pretty fast so I just lock them to 90fps and they stay around 50c. FPS can go down to about 45 if i'm looking around really fast with a lot of stuff going on but I've never seen it go below that.
Fraps benchmark put me at max 201, average 132.625, and min 56. So not too bad I suppose, the drops were when picking teams and junk.
Up to 130fps+
1440 x 900 resolution all graphics set to max
I rarely get in situations where fps gets low enough to the point where it is annoying but it does happen. Although I could lighten up on the graphics settings a bit :)
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2GHz & 4GHz
Radeon HD 6950 & 1GHz
CORSAIR DOMINATOR GT (2 x 2GB) DDR3 1866
Liquid cooling for teh 0\/0rc10x omg
570gtx stock oc
8gig ram
1680*
I can play all maxed out fine (except AO.. never turned it on).
If i want heavy endgame with lots of action to not lower fps so much that i can feel it... i lower shadows and particels.
Heh. :D I was surprised too. I upgraded my pc nearly a year ago (with a SSD and all the new stuff), but kept my old graphic card. I want to buy a new one as soon as it is necessary. But until now I'm fine with it. I think the i5 does this magic. With the resolution of 1280x768 the waiting for gpu sticks mostly between 4 and 6ms. But I can't play it on my native resolution.
i7-3770 3.5GHz
GTX 680 2GB
32 GB Ram
Windows 7 64-bit
2 Dell Ultrasharp 1920x1200 monitors
Max settings, vertical sync 60fps.
I usually play at 1080p and 30fps because then fraps will make a video that is good for posting to YouTube and such.
2012-12-27 19:19:38 - ns2
Frames: 97219 - Time: 1206172ms - Avg: 80.601 - Min: 48 - Max: 157
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/Cvsni.png" border="0" class="linked-image" />
GPU: GTX 670
Memory: 32GB
Menu: 100fps
Game: usually 60fps
Screen res: 1920x1080
All settings maxed
AMD FX-8150 Stock
8gb 1600
HIS HD 6950 2gb
win 7 64 bit
Frames Time (ms) Min Max Avg
45718 1142723 10 fps- 66 fps- 40.008 fps
[attachment=36184:ns2_1.png]
i7 3770k - stock
GTX 460 1GB
8GB Kingston Blues
OCZ Vertex 3 SSD
Never goes below 40fps
80-100 early game
80 mid game
60 late game
everything maxed out.
lol.
This is very true. There are enough factors without people making guesstimates. FPS will vary depending on game-length, server size, which team you are playing, how often you die, which map you played on.
Nah, I know the average FPS I get and posting a range is just as "accurate" as a snapshot of one round on a map, just less fancy.
[edit]
I mean with the huge difference between the systems in here, and some oddballs of High end, low performance. It still is only a guesstimate...
[edit]
I mean with the huge difference between the systems in here, and some oddballs of High end, low performance. It still is only a guesstimate...<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No. The numbers you come up with in your head are not as accurate as the ones recorded by software. Also, you would be surprised by the number of people that flat out lie about their FPS numbers or spew vitriol like, "well it feels like im getting 60fps."
Fraps or get out.
Fraps or get out.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Got me some FPS counter up on the top corner all the time (DXtory FPS counter) and I'm always keeping my eye on that during any part of the a round so I know if I need to over compensate or under compensate my aiming. I also take mental note each build about the Lowest and Highest FPS in all three situation I posted. I don't need not program to tell me what FPS I'm getting afterwards...
GPU: AMD 7850 (2GB VRAM, overclocked)
RAM: 8GB Corsair
Graphics settings: Everything maxed, 1920x1080
Menu: 70 FPS
Game: 40-55 FPS normally, down to 25 FPS in extreme fights.
Your mind is not capable of recording as accurately as a computer.
Frames: 76672 - Time: 2507594ms - Avg: 30.576 - Min: 12 - Max: 64
i5-2430m, 2,4 Ghz I believe, don't really remember
8gb ram
GeForece 540m 2gb
All low + very odd resolution of 1280x600 (got black stripes on top and bottom of the screen, don't use such resolution anywhere else >_<)
About 50 in early game (love early game), more like 20-25 late game and if aliens dominate (hence crags, shades, eggs, shifts and whips in every room, tons of them) it drops to like 10-15 :(
Tho I'm used to it, had outdated rigs for about 15 years now :D When I buy a new pc/laptop, it's already mid-tier, and then I use it for few years (not a gamer much). So, I consider 30 fps fine for playing.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
hi,
for me:
i5-2430m, 2,4ghz turbo boost ~ 3ghz
4go ram
Geforce GT 540m 2gb
all low, resolution of 1280*720 or lower to 800*600 (5fps more)
early game 50 right, 20-30 in alien front of one ennemi 10 15 in late game
in human immediatly 20-25, then 15 main game and 5-10 late game
I have activated optimus and follow all tips for improve performances.
WTF with this ?
r_stats 1 send me : "waiting for gpu:0"
so my frame rate deal with my processor, a i5 2,4ghz boosting to 3 ghz is more powerful than a core duo 2,4, no ? :D
so what can I do ?
I only want a small minimal 20 fps, a 25-30 fps to play is fine for me, even in minimal graphic.
any idea ??
Your mind is not capable of admitting you're wrong.
I have this handy G19 keyboard with a little color LCD screen on it and a graph, I'm constantly monitoring my FPS along with my video card speed, usage %, Voltage, Heat, and fan speed.
But oh look I can turn a csv file into a chart yipee...
<img src="http://an.davidsirritation.com/fps.png" border="0" class="linked-image" />
And surprise surprise it's pretty much exactly representative of what I said earlier.
I created a totally unrealistic scenario: spawned 10 exos, 10 regular marines, 6 or so onos, 8 or so fades, 6 or so skulks, and 8 or so lerks all in the data core hive room in ns2_summit with full infestation. In addition, I also dropped about 20 crags, a few shifts (and maxed out their egg deployment) and all upgrades. I then went lerk and spammed spores and umbra all over the room. All graphic settings are at their maximum. Tried with and without shades to stealth all of the aliens.
Try as I might, I couldn't get the FPS to drop below 33 (measured with fraps.) Here are my specs:
i7 2600k @ 4.4
Sapphire OC 7850
8GB 1600 8-8-8
Samsung 840 Pro
As I stated earlier, this isn't exactly a high end system, and 33fps isn't bad at all, and given how unrealistic of a scenario I created, I can't see it staying that low on a regular basis. I'm also running windows 8 (with metro apps removed) if that matters to anybody.
I have this handy G19 keyboard with a little color LCD screen on it and a graph, I'm constantly monitoring my FPS along with my video card speed, usage %, Voltage, Heat, and fan speed.
But oh look I can turn a csv file into a chart yipee...
And surprise surprise it's pretty much exactly representative of what I said earlier.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm right though. Why would I say I'm wrong? Why even make or post in the thread if all we are going to get is people's estimates of what they might be getting? It's completely pointless to capture inaccurate information.
here's the thing about that, anyone can make a chart do whatever they want, want to see me make one saying 500fps the entire time? You are wrong because the only thing that really matters is the integrity of the person posting. Some guys like Kouji you can trust.
<a href="http://www.unknownworlds.com/ns2/forums/index.php?showtopic=119506" target="_blank">http://www.unknownworlds.com/ns2/forums/in...howtopic=119506</a>
No. I only trust a Fraps benchmark.
Well thankfully no one else seems to agree with your opinion so have a nice day.
Its people like you that gives me a small slimmer of hope for humanity.