Is Res Sucking Still Going To Be In 2.0?
hyperionjjliu
Join Date: 2003-04-14 Member: 15505Members
<div class="IPBDescription">... Thanks for helping me!</div> Hey everyone, I'm a new poster to this forum, even though I've been reading other people's posts for a long time already.
Anyways, I'm really really excited about NS version 2.0. It looks amazingly cool.
I have one question though that I wasn't able to find the answer to in the changelogs posted here (I may be wrong though and if I am, I'm really sorry). I was wondering:
Can the gorge still suck resources from a unbuilt/uncapped node? (basically, can an alien player go suck himself into an onos or into a fade?)
If so, what are the restrictions, if any, on the resource sucking?
Thanks a lot for answering my question guys!
Anyways, I'm really really excited about NS version 2.0. It looks amazingly cool.
I have one question though that I wasn't able to find the answer to in the changelogs posted here (I may be wrong though and if I am, I'm really sorry). I was wondering:
Can the gorge still suck resources from a unbuilt/uncapped node? (basically, can an alien player go suck himself into an onos or into a fade?)
If so, what are the restrictions, if any, on the resource sucking?
Thanks a lot for answering my question guys!
Comments
Yeah, I really didn't think it was fair anyways that any alien player can become an onos within a few minutes. Hehe, I'm glad that Flayra took it out.
Thanks again guys!
The irony of this statement (in light of your own signature) is so heavy you could use it to bludgeon someone to death.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->-- Arguing on the internet is like winning the Special Olympics, even if u win ... your still retarded.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The irony of this statement (in light of your own signature) is so heavy you could use it to bludgeon someone to death.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->-- Arguing on the internet is like winning the Special Olympics, even if u win ... your still retarded.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
The funny thing is he has the wrong "you're".
Yes, it is quite offensive. After all, the grammar is incorrect. =p
Plz don't be so sensitive when you have an almost equally negative sig. Its just not right.
<!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
I disagree with this theory. Its actually the BEST way to argue. This is because it is an even playing field, where each arguer can argue their point from a similar standpoint.
In real life you can be intimidated by environment, circumstance, or more importantly the physical stature of an oponant ie "i dont agree with you, im going to bust you up now". People use "arging/internet/retarded" line to mean that if it was real life you wouldnt be so tough, and id beat you up cause im a stronger male than you. This is not what arguing is about, a physical stand off. It should be an exchange of ideas on an even playing field.
Plz don't be so sensitive when you have an almost equally negative sig. Its just not right. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
What's more amusing is that he's used the wrong "its" in this statement. When will people learn how to use the apostrophe correctly??
Plz don't be so sensitive when you have an almost equally negative sig. Its just not right. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What's more amusing is that he's used the wrong "its" in this statement. When will people learn how to use the apostrophe correctly?? <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
i totally think genius is limited by the fear aspect of your brain and not bein' able to sail the seas and explore like the world is not flat <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif'><!--endemo--> heh kinda matrix-inspired there o well, im an idiot <!--emo&::asrifle::--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/asrifle.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='asrifle.gif'><!--endemo-->
Plz don't be so sensitive when you have an almost equally negative sig. Its just not right. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
What's more amusing is that he's used the wrong "its" in this statement. When will people learn how to use the apostrophe correctly?? <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Hmmmmz, I thought that apostrophe was correct when used to indicate possesion? Maybe I'm wrong, anyway my sig isn't offensive , your sig isn't offensive simply because it's negative, it's offensive because it insults people who have a disability which cannot be helped, mine is simply pointing out that there a re a lot of stupid out there.
Edit: I was wrong, thanks Roob, sig has been corrected.