Member levels
We've already established that post count doesn't matter for how respected people are in the community, yet the member levels continue to reflect the opposite. I think it'd make more sense to have the member levels be based on the amount of time someone is registered with the forums. That way, people who have been here for a while but don't post very often are still recognized as the veterans they are.
Comments
*edit* I just realized I have virtually no posts. Sorry. *edit*
I know automatically am greater than everyone who has already posted in this thread. Send me your money and first daughter.
But seriously, would it be possible to base the member levels on time rather than post count? I'm just saying this because of the onslaught of idiots that I'm sure is coming soon, and I don't think it'd be appropriate for the n00b spammers to leave a lot of us middle-post-count regulars in the dust.
but the onslaught of n00bs could be killed by the mods and admins i think.....
maybe a mix of both things would be ok.... if u have posts u get the member level, and if ur an old member u get the member level too.......
I don't see too much problem with the system as it is now. But mine is but one vote.
Am I at Foul Best yet?
-Ryan!
Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something.
-- Plato