Rts Vs Fps Online

S_T_A_R_S_BarryS_T_A_R_S_Barry Join Date: 2003-03-17 Member: 14624Members
<div class="IPBDescription">war of the abeveations</div> ok first of what are better to play online FPS or RTS, origenaly i thought FPS of course but with warcraft 3 thats all gone out the window, i havent luaghed so hard at maps on any FPS as i have on Uthers party 0.50 or hampster dance. And these auto DL to your PC in seconds not minutes, like on FPS, i have like 200 maps for warcraft 3 no joke its taking about 500 mb of my memory, half lfie 500mb will be about 50 maps i should no i had TFC for years. OK but back on trak what is over all more fun while FPS are intense and quick action, running around odging bullets, only thinking ahed for a few seconds is fun, but is it more fun than time consuming slow but equely instense RTS, that make you think ahed for around 10 minutes thinking stretedgy after counter stratedgy, even a simply minded game on warcraft 3 like a res evil map (survive 10 waves of living death) thats bassicaly you and a few other spread out across a map fighting for your life hidng sniping, and genrally running like hell, untill some how you all meet, then set up camp and hope the zombies dont break your blockade.

for those who dont play warcraft 3 heres something you should no some units are heros that have EXP and inventory so you level up learns new speels auras techniques and pick up new weps to enchance your skills, this means you can stand on the same spot for an hour and not get boared, how ever FPS have nothing like this, unless your on a server running the CS warcraft 3 mod (yes lvl up and gain warcraft abilities to frag those terrist scum with, ever tried killing an invisable CT well...). what this post is really about is a vote, WITH REASONS what is better RTS or FPS, il be intrested to ehar your opnions on this and my multiple spelling mistakes and crap paragraphing thanks. <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif'><!--endemo-->

Comments

  • Doug_the_HeadDoug_the_Head Join Date: 2003-03-26 Member: 14909Members
    Capitalization, punctuation, and paragraphs are your friends.
  • DiscoZombieDiscoZombie Join Date: 2003-08-05 Member: 18951Members
    WE DON'T NEED NO EDUCATION
    WE DON'T NEED NO THOUGHT CONTROL
    NO DARK SARCASM IN THE CLASSROOM
    TEACHER, LEAVE THEM KIDS ALONE.

    ...back on topic, I suck at RTS games, especially WC3, so I prefer FPS... what're these hilarious WC3 maps of which you speak? I'm too lazy to download. There's some hilarity in half-life... the Rats maps are rather phunny, for instance...
  • MorrikMorrik Join Date: 2002-11-11 Member: 8247Awaiting Authorization
    Please, use PERIODS!

    Anyway, FPS will always be the best online Genere in my books. Take a look at Counter Strike! That MOD of Half Life boasts over 30,000 players daily. The FPS Genere will never touch the MMORPG Genere though. The actual numbers are staggering and you finally get to see that RTS slacks off in the 3rd place posistion.
  • pardzhpardzh Join Date: 2002-10-25 Member: 1601Members
    Well FPS is dominant in most countries, but RTS has it's merits...

    Look at Korea. <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif'><!--endemo-->

    I'm a fan of both, I'm currently loving 2v2 RT WC3X, microing battles is so fun.
  • MausMaus Join Date: 2002-11-03 Member: 5599Members
    Hmm, the topic title gave me an excellent thought. A game where one side played RTS-style by one commander person, with the AI controlling his troops, while the other team is played by a bunch of individual players in first-person.
Sign In or Register to comment.