Strange Network Setup

AnarkiThreeXSixAnarkiThreeXSix x_x Join Date: 2003-12-31 Member: 24894Members
<div class="IPBDescription">Help!?</div>My network at home currently goes like this..

Modem goes to Wireless Router and I have two PCs that connect to that router with wireless adapters to get Internet access that way.

What I would like to do is take another router and hook it up between my two PCs with Ethernet cables so that I can share files way faster.

The problem is, when I hook up the second router and the two PCs to that router, everything just completely stops working.
I've tried to Google a solution but I haven't been able to find anyone trying to do this so I've gone by some other tips but to no avail.

Any help would be appreciated. =)

Comments

  • That_Annoying_KidThat_Annoying_Kid Sire of Titles Join Date: 2003-03-01 Member: 14175Members, Constellation
    what kind of cables are you using to hook the two routers together (crossover, straighthru, rollover, etc)

    what kind of routers are they


    why can't you just build a rollover or whatever cable is for pc2pc connections and just do that?
  • ZaggyZaggy NullPointerException The Netherlands Join Date: 2003-12-10 Member: 24214Forum Moderators, NS2 Playtester, Reinforced - Onos, Subnautica Playtester
    edited July 2011
    Why did you add a router? What you need is a switch!
    Check the configuration of the second router, make sure it does nothing routerish, DHCP, firewall, routing tables etc.
  • lolfighterlolfighter Snark, Dire Join Date: 2003-04-20 Member: 15693Members
    Yeah, in a situation like this a switch is a much better choice. Switches are even a little faster than routers, which is why you don't use a router where a switch will suffice.
  • AnarkiThreeXSixAnarkiThreeXSix x_x Join Date: 2003-12-31 Member: 24894Members
    I do have a Linksys SD205 5-Port 10/100 Switch in my possession and I did try to hook it up between the two computers but was unable to get any sort of file sharing going on, so I figured I'd try with the router.. guess I should go back to the switch then eh?

    @ TAK: I don't have the two routers connected to each other, I want them to work separately. Which now will be just the switch all on its own between the two computers with two straight through cables going to each.

    Is there something special I have to do to get the switch to work?
  • ZaggyZaggy NullPointerException The Netherlands Join Date: 2003-12-10 Member: 24214Forum Moderators, NS2 Playtester, Reinforced - Onos, Subnautica Playtester
    <!--quoteo(post=1859119:date=Jul 9 2011, 05:56 PM:name=AnarkiThreeXSix)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AnarkiThreeXSix @ Jul 9 2011, 05:56 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1859119"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I do have a Linksys SD205 5-Port 10/100 Switch in my possession and I did try to hook it up between the two computers but was unable to get any sort of file sharing going on, so I figured I'd try with the router.. guess I should go back to the switch then eh?

    @ TAK: I don't have the two routers connected to each other, I want them to work separately. Which now will be just the switch all on its own between the two computers with two straight through cables going to each.

    Is there something special I have to do to get the switch to work?<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    Let me show you my excellent mspaint skills:

    <img src="http://i.imgur.com/ilD8Q.png" border="0" class="linked-image" />

    Step 1: try to ping a PC
    Step 2: wrap your head around Windows file sharing
    Step 3: curse at Windows file sharing and set up a FTP server (filezilla?)
  • A_Boojum_SnarkA_Boojum_Snark Join Date: 2003-09-07 Member: 20628Members
    edited July 2011
    If all you want is for the two PCs to be linked with wire for faster transfer, and they will still use wireless for internet access, you don't even need hardware. Just directly link them with a cable, and have the NICs set to an IP range that isn't the one your wireless router uses. If one or both machines has a gigabit NIC you don't even need a crossover (gigabit specifications have built-in crossover detection that handles it on the software level).

    I do this myself between my old and new computers, because I only have one cable running to this room from the router. The router (and the rest of the LAN) are on 192.168.2.X as well as the motherboard NIC in my new machine. The secondary NIC and the old computer are set to 192.168.3.X and are directly linked with a cable. Windows sees what's up and knows what to do and sharing is all fine and dandy. (between the two, that is. other machines on the LAN can't see my old one, but they don't need to, and I assume that's the case for you too.)
  • TalesinTalesin Our own little well of hate Join Date: 2002-11-08 Member: 7710NS1 Playtester, Forum Moderators
    edited July 2011
    The most likely cause is due to the following:
    -By default, wired connections (normally) take priority over wireless, when detected as connected.
    -Unless you set up IP addresses manually for the wired connections, they're trying to request a DHCP lease. If you're using a switch, there will be no DHCP server available on the wired interface, and will not be able to connect.
    -If you're using a 'home router' (which aren't actually ROUTERS, but usually just embedded NAT devices), it will provide a DHCP return setting your default gateway to itself, in a default configuration. As it has no WAN connection, packets just die there.

    What you need to do:
    -Use a switch or crossover cable to connect the systems. MANUALLY set up IP addresses on the wired interfaces on a different non-routable addressing scheme from the ones your wireless router provides. (ie: If your wireless IP is a 192.168.x.x, use 10.x.x.x for the wired, and vice-versa. Usually 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2, or 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2 with a netmask of 255.255.255.0 for either of them)
    -REMOVE the default gateway entry/ies from the IP range on the wired connection.
    -Set the wired interface to take higher priority on your adapter list (with the gateway entry removed, it should only route traffic for THAT network schema over the interface)

    -<b>RUN WIRES.</b> Seriously, stop being a lazy-***. It's faster, and wifi was never meant to replace an ACTUAL network, just to provide connectivity to mobile devices. The fact that it's easier means people will pull half-***ed crap like this, making more headaches for themselves and anyone in the vicinity of their RF bubble. This isn't 'strange'. It's something to be slapped for doing. ****.


    <!--sizeo:1--><span style="font-size:8pt;line-height:100%"><!--/sizeo-->(Yes, I'm a network engineer for a living; doing installations, troubleshooting, support and debugging of networks. And yes, I've called my clients dumb****s for doing similar **** to this, and fixed it for them so it'd work PROPERLY, instead of half-***ed bull****, just barely creaking along and causing said problems for themselves and their neighbors. Same thing with ripping out 'powerline' networks... holy **** do I hate those things.)<!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec-->
  • AnarkiThreeXSixAnarkiThreeXSix x_x Join Date: 2003-12-31 Member: 24894Members
    I would run wires if I could, but at the current place I'm renting a room at that isn't an option sadly. =(

    I'll hook up the switch when I get home, and use 10.x.x.x since that's probably what messed me up in the first place..
    My wireless router is 192.168.10.1 so I was setting the switch manually to be 192.168.20.1
  • That_Annoying_KidThat_Annoying_Kid Sire of Titles Join Date: 2003-03-01 Member: 14175Members, Constellation
    application
    presentation
    session
    transport
    network
    data link
    physical



    ][_,{[]}][_,
  • lolfighterlolfighter Snark, Dire Join Date: 2003-04-20 Member: 15693Members
    I DID consider going off on a rant about how ###### wireless is, but people tend to stop listening to you when you start yelling at them. Besides, we can't expect everyone who wants some kind of home network to have a degree in it. What people want, and what home networking needs, is plug & play functionality.

    Sadly, the prevalence of wireless means that people are increasingly willing to smugly slap down any request for some goddamn cable to be laid in, because yeah we're totally going to be satisfied with an inferior, ###### solution just because the stuff that works reliably would require a smidgen of effort of them. And then they go "well everyone else is connected, you must have screwed up your settings" when their ###### doesn't work. I feel your pain Anarki.

    Oh wait, now I went and ranted anyway.
  • Chris0132Chris0132 Join Date: 2009-07-25 Member: 68262Members
    edited July 2011
    You could do what I do.

    You see you can get these rather cool things that plug into your wall sockets and run a wired signal through your electricity wires. They're basically a box you plug into your wall and it has an ethernet port on it. You plug one end into the router, one end into your PC, and you magically get an ethernet connection between two electrical sockets.

    You could use that for your two PCs, they are however quite expensive, I think mine was £100 plus.

    It's handy for me given that my PC is in the back bedroom while the man from virgin decided the best place to put the router connection was behind the sofa in the living room, as my mum isn't the best computer expert she didn't think to tell him to put it somewhere intelligent.
  • TalesinTalesin Our own little well of hate Join Date: 2002-11-08 Member: 7710NS1 Playtester, Forum Moderators
    <!--quoteo(post=1859204:date=Jul 9 2011, 04:27 PM:name=AnarkiThreeXSix)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AnarkiThreeXSix @ Jul 9 2011, 04:27 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1859204"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I would run wires if I could, but at the current place I'm renting a room at that isn't an option sadly. =(<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    That is ALWAYS an option. If it truly isn't (which means three feet of concrete and NO conduits, anything else is just lazy-*** excuses), look into a DEDICATED wireless ethernet bridge.
    <!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I'll hook up the switch when I get home, and use 10.x.x.x since that's probably what messed me up in the first place..
    My wireless router is 192.168.10.1 so I was setting the switch manually to be 192.168.20.1<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    If your netmask is 255.255.255.0, then changing the third triplet should work just as well; you just need to create a new higher-priority route ONLY for that subnet

    <!--quoteo(post=1859358:date=Jul 10 2011, 05:02 AM:name=Chris0132)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Chris0132 @ Jul 10 2011, 05:02 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1859358"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->You see you can get these rather cool things that plug into your wall sockets and run a wired signal through your electricity wires. They're basically a box you plug into your wall and it has an ethernet port on it. You plug one end into the router, one end into your PC, and you magically get an ethernet connection between two electrical sockets.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Yes, those are 'powerline' adapters. As noted, hate those quite a bit; induce RF interference on the power lines of your home. Anything without a filter setup is then subjected to the additional line noise in what SHOULD be a nice, smooth sine wave. Can cause erratic behaviours in all KINDS of electronics; some more sensitive gear can outright FAIL if one of those pieces of <b>****</b> is installed.
Sign In or Register to comment.