Stasis rifle, knife, prop cannon. Totally overpowered.

sayerulzsayerulz oregon Join Date: 2015-04-15 Member: 203493Members
The game is meant to be have one fearing the creatures around you, because, as I have been told so many times when I suggest any sort of weapon, we are not meant to be the top predator, we have to be afraid of the hostile life. But the stasis rifle/knife combo, and the prop cannon, make all of the predators useless. with little effort, you can kill anything in the game but reapers. And for those, you can simply build a cyclops and not have to worry about them (or anything else) ever again. Ironically, many weapon sugestion threads add far weaker things than these. They really need to be nerfed. (I personally dont like the stasis rifle at all cuz physics)
«1

Comments

  • Mr357Mr357 Join Date: 2015-03-31 Member: 202777Members
    The knife is fine. The only reasons it works against predators are the aforementioned stasis rifle and the fact that the AI aren't terribly advanced yet.
  • BensonBenson Join Date: 2012-03-07 Member: 148303Members, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Shadow
    I have to agree that the statis rifle eliminates any threat from any predator.

    I built a base by the underwater islands on a ledge with around 8-10 bonesharks in the area.

    One fully charged shot from the statis rifle let me build in peace, and, combined with the charge-fins, I was able to build a base amid a pack of bonesharks without taking ANY damage.

    Perhaps if the creatures were slowed, instead of stopped cold, things would still be a challenge
  • IronHorseIronHorse Developer, QA Manager, Technical Support & contributor Join Date: 2010-05-08 Member: 71669Members, Super Administrators, Forum Admins, Forum Moderators, NS2 Developer, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Subnautica Playtester, Subnautica PT Lead, Pistachionauts
    Instead of nerfing something, why not increase the threats as you upgrade / progress through the game?

    I don't see too much of a problem with stasis (other than it barely uses energy) early on.
    But if you could eventually have stalkers or bonesharks etc later attempt to dodge you it could just make things more interesting.
  • SeldkamSeldkam Join Date: 2014-01-01 Member: 191213Members
    IronHorse wrote: »
    Instead of nerfing something, why not increase the threats as you upgrade / progress through the game?

    I don't see too much of a problem with stasis (other than it barely uses energy) early on.
    But if you could eventually have stalkers or bonesharks etc later attempt to dodge you it could just make things more interesting.
    Agree

    Or have the warper for instance (if he is aggressive, if he is passive then there's not much of a point putting this in) open a portal that teleports your stasis bubble somewhere else, etc. etc.

    Bonesharks could adapt and grow plating that can vibrate (heh IDK, I'm not a scientist :P ) and allow it to move slowly with increasing speed through a bubble
  • 04Leonhardt04Leonhardt I came here to laugh at you Join Date: 2015-08-01 Member: 206618Members
    The Reaper Leviathan laughs at your audacity.
  • ArkStrikeArkStrike Venezuela Join Date: 2015-05-06 Member: 204212Members
    All of this gear has limited utility and can be inconvinient sometimes.

    For the stasis rifle you are all talking like you WILL hit any target despite the fact that from most people I see playing, they miss and a lot. The bubble has limited duration and no it can't be made to "slow down" enemies because thats not how stasis works or at least I think it doesn't work that way.

    The knife needs a lot of work to kill anything and it has to be at close range which is risky.

    Propulsion cannon is being worked on so it aggros whatever you use it on, so like the stalker or boneshark you just threw above sea level would be faster and stronger for a short period of time in a fit of rage to get back at you.
  • BIPPITYBIPPITY England Join Date: 2015-06-06 Member: 205283Members
    Reaper Leviathan just saying breh try that stasis rifle knife combo on me.
  • BensonBenson Join Date: 2012-03-07 Member: 148303Members, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Shadow
    I dont shoot at things with the statis rifle, I charge it up and shoot the terrain nearby. Anything comming at me will get stuck in the huge bubble, and Ill be safe.

    The only reason I'm able to do this is because its so easy to "side-step" predetors while charging it. Maybe this could be looked at to make things a bit harder?
  • TotallyLemonTotallyLemon Atlanta Georgia Join Date: 2015-05-22 Member: 204764Members
    Make the player scared of local fauna.

    This only leads to fear and fear warrants violence. This suggestion is entirely counterintuitive and poorly though out.
  • RadavvadraRadavvadra South Africa Join Date: 2015-08-15 Member: 207189Members
    edited August 2015
    I am afraid of the creatures even when I have a stasis rifle, I think the stasis rifle is fine as it is (dont know about the prop gun since i haven't used it much yet).
  • Duff_McDugginDuff_McDuggin Join Date: 2015-07-02 Member: 205964Members
    edited August 2015
    the stasis rifle is fine as is in my opinion. well the power usage considering what it does could be a bit more. it seems like its not using quite enough power for creating a sustained suspension field, but we are technologically advance and should be able to fight a fish with some advancements in tech. At some point you should be able to rise above your environment once you do enough research.
  • SkyninSkynin Russia Join Date: 2015-08-08 Member: 206915Members
    Here's the thing. While playing, i realized something - what if i will kill all the stalkers? Damn, i won't be able to harvest teeth anymore to craft enameled glass.
    This idea is applicable to all species, because each of them will have special role in ecosystem and gameplay in general. Items like Transfuser, for example, will be most useful if all types of creature are available to the player.

    If you decide to go on killing spree, you are risking to lose important resources. Saving as many species as possible untouched is in your best interests.
  • Duff_McDugginDuff_McDuggin Join Date: 2015-07-02 Member: 205964Members
    This is true, I have until about a week ago been playing in freedom with debug. No collecting resources. Just wasn't enough in the game yet (knew there was a lot more coming) to engage myself that much. I tried to do it a few months ago, but I maxed out too fast to play as game was intended. Started playing in survival with no debug codes after habitat. Already I am depleting populations of fish particular to an area. Stalkers don't live around my shallows base any more because I have consumed a large amount of peepers. No food, no stalkers, or so it would seem as I have little need to kill stalkers. The defenses we have right now may not be overpowered. We may just need some kind of re spawn cycle. Don't hunt in an area for a set time and that area begins to repopulate. I suspect that manufacturing food such as some kind of sustenance unit (cube of protein and vitamins made from environmental ingredients) will come into play, negating the need to consume all the fish in the area. So the power of our current defenses, I think can only be better gauged once more of the play mechanics are in place.
  • 04Leonhardt04Leonhardt I came here to laugh at you Join Date: 2015-08-01 Member: 206618Members
    Skynin wrote: »
    If you decide to go on killing spree, you are risking to lose important resources. Saving as many species as possible untouched is in your best interests.

    Can we all just grow up and admit that the argument of "if the player is given weapons they'll just go on a killing spree and murder the whole ocean then quit playing the game!" is hilariously dumb?

  • SkyninSkynin Russia Join Date: 2015-08-08 Member: 206915Members
    Skynin wrote: »
    If you decide to go on killing spree, you are risking to lose important resources. Saving as many species as possible untouched is in your best interests.

    Can we all just grow up and admit that the argument of "if the player is given weapons they'll just go on a killing spree and murder the whole ocean then quit playing the game!" is hilariously dumb?

    You're missing the point.

  • BIPPITYBIPPITY England Join Date: 2015-06-06 Member: 205283Members
    its a bit ridiculous that one person can overfish an entire area until there is no life left, JUST to meet there requirements...
  • sayerulzsayerulz oregon Join Date: 2015-04-15 Member: 203493Members
    BIPPITY wrote: »
    its a bit ridiculous that one person can overfish an entire area until there is no life left, JUST to meet there requirements...

    Indeed, I suspect that even a small coral reef on earth would be able to sustain one person forever. I see no reason why this planet should be different.
  • Captain_PyroCaptain_Pyro Germany Join Date: 2015-05-31 Member: 205116Members
    I don't see any problems with the knife or the Repulsion cannon. I never managed to kill something with the RepCan and i don't know if it's even possible. I use it to insta-splode crashers, move boulders and "Nope" the big fish away. Nothing offensively offensive about it imho.
    Benson wrote: »
    I dont shoot at things with the statis rifle, I charge it up and shoot the terrain nearby. Anything comming at me will get stuck in the huge bubble, and Ill be safe.

    The only reason I'm able to do this is because its so easy to "side-step" predetors while charging it. Maybe this could be looked at to make things a bit harder?

    This is exactly why i think the stasis rifle is too powerful; the AOE sphere it creates. If it was a punctual shot - and a little bit more precise and reliable - it would be more skillbased to stun a predator. The bubbles also stay for too long.
    IronHorse wrote: »
    Instead of nerfing something, why not increase the threats as you upgrade / progress through the game?

    I don't see too much of a problem with stasis (other than it barely uses energy) early on.
    But if you could eventually have stalkers or bonesharks etc later attempt to dodge you it could just make things more interesting.

    The Stasis Rifle enables you to easily make offensive maneuvers against bigger fish, be they dumb or smart about it. The idea of a nonleathal stun gun is pretty nice, but i think it's utility should be nerfed. It's to easy to create a sphere on a wall or plant and hide inside to let the fish come to you ... and yes the AI needs polishing either way.

    If the bubble would only stun near to it's center and slow in the outer areas, the fish could be like "hey this is not right. Let's get the eff outa here!"
  • RaffleBaffleRaffleBaffle New York Join Date: 2015-08-19 Member: 207279Members
    IMO knife is fine, in fact, I would be happy to see a more powerful weapon enter the game. I haven't tried the burning knife yet, but I have the diamond knife. Against bone sharks, it takes around 5-7 hits (not exactly sure) to kill them. Adding a machete or similar weapon with 2-3x the power of the knife for use against hostile fauna as well as "terraforming" or chopping down big vines would be nice.

    Stasis rifle: I think the only mod I would approve of would be making the bubbles disappear faster.

    Prop can: Haven't even built one yet : S
  • MyrmMyrm Sweden Join Date: 2015-08-16 Member: 207210Members
    How effective would a machete be underwater? A knife is a jabbing/stabbing motion which is no proplem, but a machete is a swinging/slashing weapon. Water would have a real counteractive resistance against such movement.
  • 04Leonhardt04Leonhardt I came here to laugh at you Join Date: 2015-08-01 Member: 206618Members
    You can use the PropCannon to kill smaller creatures by shooting them into walls or other creatures.
  • Duff_McDugginDuff_McDuggin Join Date: 2015-07-02 Member: 205964Members
    I want the Doom BFG so I can slaughter everything that moves. AAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
  • tyler111762tyler111762 Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Join Date: 2015-05-17 Member: 204558Members
    Skynin wrote: »
    If you decide to go on killing spree, you are risking to lose important resources. Saving as many species as possible untouched is in your best interests.

    Can we all just grow up and admit that the argument of "if the player is given weapons they'll just go on a killing spree and murder the whole ocean then quit playing the game!" is hilariously dumb?

    leon. you see my profile picture? that's the canadian national firearms association.

    i fight for gun rights IN REAL LIFE. and people tell me that owning an AR-15 makes people violent. that guns are only for mass murder.

    people use that argument fervently in real life in the face of evidence to the contrary. people will cling to their arguments because it's all they have.

    if someone will tell me to my face " if you are given a gun what's to stop you from shooting up a school." i doubt they would have any issue saying the same about some peepers.
  • sayerulzsayerulz oregon Join Date: 2015-04-15 Member: 203493Members
    Skynin wrote: »
    If you decide to go on killing spree, you are risking to lose important resources. Saving as many species as possible untouched is in your best interests.

    Can we all just grow up and admit that the argument of "if the player is given weapons they'll just go on a killing spree and murder the whole ocean then quit playing the game!" is hilariously dumb?

    leon. you see my profile picture? that's the canadian national firearms association.

    i fight for gun rights IN REAL LIFE. and people tell me that owning an AR-15 makes people violent. that guns are only for mass murder.

    people use that argument fervently in real life in the face of evidence to the contrary. people will cling to their arguments because it's all they have.

    if someone will tell me to my face " if you are given a gun what's to stop you from shooting up a school." i doubt they would have any issue saying the same about some peepers.

    Why do you try so hard to bring political issues into this?
  • tyler111762tyler111762 Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Join Date: 2015-05-17 Member: 204558Members
    Myrm wrote: »
    How effective would a machete be underwater? A knife is a jabbing/stabbing motion which is no proplem, but a machete is a swinging/slashing weapon. Water would have a real counteractive resistance against such movement.

    well. from a physics standpoint. a machete would work under water, but not as effectively as on land.


    TL;DR a machete would work, but only when swung in a straight line, with perfect edge alignment.


    if you go past this point you will have a self admitting redneck explaining the physics of bladed weaponry. you have been warned. more effective would be a rapier or other thin foil sword.


    a machete gets its cutting power in a few ways.

    - the sharpness of the edge
    - the gravitational pull on the machete when on a downswing
    - the centrifugal force of the swing.
    - and the flex of the blade.


    in the air this is all well and good. but underwater, due to the reduced gravitational effect (im not sure what the term is when you want to say how an object is effected under different mediums like air, water, or in a dense fluid or gas.) from being in water, you lose that power almost in full.

    sharpness obviously is maintained.

    centrifugal energy

    here is where it gets interesting. even a slight angle in the swing;



    target 1 target 2 target 3

    / l \


    like in 1 and 3 would send the blade in a very exaggerated direction due to the blade acting like a hydrofoil. you would need to swing the blade so that it is on a perfect 90 degree angle to the point of impact.


    we could get into the physics of drag but you can look here if you want https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics)

    skin friction would be your only drag for the most part.




    and the flex. so, as a machete arcs through the air the blade flexes. this flex acts like a spring storing energy in the blade that gets released on contact.

    im not certain but i think this would be mostly void in water.
  • 04Leonhardt04Leonhardt I came here to laugh at you Join Date: 2015-08-01 Member: 206618Members

    leon. you see my profile picture? that's the canadian national firearms association.

    i fight for gun rights IN REAL LIFE. and people tell me that owning an AR-15 makes people violent. that guns are only for mass murder.

    people use that argument fervently in real life in the face of evidence to the contrary. people will cling to their arguments because it's all they have.

    if someone will tell me to my face " if you are given a gun what's to stop you from shooting up a school." i doubt they would have any issue saying the same about some peepers.


    I understand where you're coming from but why would you make your avatar on a video game forum the logo of a real world political party
  • BIPPITYBIPPITY England Join Date: 2015-06-06 Member: 205283Members
  • Duff_McDugginDuff_McDuggin Join Date: 2015-07-02 Member: 205964Members
    edited August 2015
    guns are cool. Brains are cooler. Also far more deadly.
  • 04Leonhardt04Leonhardt I came here to laugh at you Join Date: 2015-08-01 Member: 206618Members
    guns are cool. Brains are cooler. Also far more deadly.

    Except that your brain needs tools to actually do things.
    Tools like a Speargun.

    But when we get psychic powers in the game, I'll be right there with you.

Sign In or Register to comment.