Discussion On A Possible Forum Rule

Nemesis_ZeroNemesis_Zero Old European Join Date: 2002-01-25 Member: 75Members, Retired Developer, NS1 Playtester, Constellation
edited February 2003 in Discussions
In the sense of this forum, I would like to discuss a possible rule I'd like to enforce from now on:

<span style='color:white'>***Updated to clarify.***</span>

<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->All negative statements that are aimed at another discussing persons <span style='color:white'>or groups</span> education, morale, or intelligence are considered insults and thus prohibited.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

I got this idea from the more political discussions, in which many started declaring people of other opinion as flat out illiterate. Check the Upcoming War thread for lots of examples from all sides.

Now, while some of you may believe that some other trails of thought only can be grounded on ignorance, this isn't the backpatting, but the discussions forum, and thus, other opinions have to be at least given the equal opportunity of being represented as your own notions. This includes respecting the people representing those ideas.
Otherwise, I can't see how we can retain a non-hostile environment in here. We currently see the biggest discussion in this forum degrading into namecalling, and in all honesty, I'd like to see that changed.

Please note that by this, I do not mean to limit rethorically used sarcasm, nor will I start editing posts because 'someone could be offended'. Unless the notion attacked is either known to be held by a big group, or has been taken up by one of the participants of the discussion at hand, there is no need to defend it.


Anyway, this is the discussion forum, after all. What are your thoughts on this?

Comments

  • Spyder_MonkeySpyder_Monkey Vampire-Ninja-Monkey Join Date: 2002-01-24 Member: 8Members, NS1 Playtester, Contributor
    Nemesis: Opening a discussion on forum rules? Were you born an idiot?

    All jokes aside, I'd like to see a stricter no-harrassment policy enforced throughout all forums. Any attacks at another forum-goer will result in an immediate nuclear attack.
  • Nemesis_ZeroNemesis_Zero Old European Join Date: 2002-01-25 Member: 75Members, Retired Developer, NS1 Playtester, Constellation
    edited February 2003
    <!--QuoteBegin--Spyder Monkey+Feb 24 2003, 07:52 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Spyder Monkey @ Feb 24 2003, 07:52 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Nemesis: Opening a discussion on forum rules?  Were you born an idiot? <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Let me check...

    Yes.

    [edit]Seriously, I'm specifically aiming this at this forum because one doesn't have to adress a certain member to become insulting in here: It's possible to insult five participants by labelling 'anti-war' protestors as illiterate.
    Thus, this becomes a little bigger a problem in here than in the rest of the boards, and this forum isn't exactely something I'd like to dictate rules on, I'm just too involved in many discussions.[/edit]
  • moultanomoultano Creator of ns_shiva. Join Date: 2002-12-14 Member: 10806Members, NS1 Playtester, Contributor, Constellation, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Gold, NS2 Community Developer, Pistachionauts
    sounds good to me.
    (I hope I haven't been guilty of that. Please point it out if I do <!--emo&:(--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif'><!--endemo--> )
  • bubbleblowerbubbleblower Join Date: 2003-01-18 Member: 12452Members
    I haven't had any problems thus far. I've been thinking that compared to most forums this is a pretty intelligent, well-mannered group. But I don't pretend to have read all of the threads.
  • Nemesis_ZeroNemesis_Zero Old European Join Date: 2002-01-25 Member: 75Members, Retired Developer, NS1 Playtester, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin--bubbleblower+Feb 24 2003, 08:00 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (bubbleblower @ Feb 24 2003, 08:00 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I haven't had any problems thus far. I've been thinking that compared to most forums this is a pretty intelligent, well-mannered group. But I don't pretend to have read all of the threads. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Well, compare the first five pages of the 'Upcoming War' discussion with the current posts. There is definetely an increase in hostility, and I'd like to get that under control as long as it's still possible.
  • BogglesteinskyBogglesteinsky Join Date: 2002-12-24 Member: 11488Members
    yeah, sounds like a good idea to me

    i would also like to suggest another bit of (what should be) common sense netiqutte and that is

    <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->all of your issues with a particular person's post stay in that thread. ie don't refer to a particular post in an insulting way in a completely different topic.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    I would hope that this is common sense, but there may be people out there who need to be reminded
  • AllUrHiveRblong2usAllUrHiveRblong2us By Your Powers Combined... Join Date: 2002-12-20 Member: 11244Members
    I think the current system is working quite well, actually(bet you never thought you'd hear that outa me). If you wanna change it, go ahead, at least you said you won't be messing with the sarcasm. I eat sarcasm for fuel.
  • Relic25Relic25 Pixel Punk Join Date: 2002-01-24 Member: 39Members, Retired Developer, NS1 Playtester, Contributor
    Hey, I was just about to start a whole new thread on the following thought, but it seems to fit so nicely within this one. I think it applies very well.

    It seems to me that a lot of our forum goers (and people in general) have this tendency to think along the lines of, "others must earn my respect before I give it to them". I'll freely admit that I used to hold the same belief. In fact, it wasn't until about 10 years ago that I learned how misguided this line of thought really was.

    The truth is, <i>everyone</i> deserves my respect, <i>until they do something that causes them to lose that respect</i>. It's really that simple. Assuming that any given person (eg: a forum goer, a stranger on the street, etc.) is not worthy of your respect is not only slighting the other person, it could also deprive you of the possibility of learning something valuable from that person.

    I hate to sound like an old man, but I've been there. If people really took the time to think this issue through, I can almost guarantee that they would come to the same conclusion. Hopefully, by me relating my own experience, some of you may re-examine how you treat others, if not for others' sake, then for your own.


    Now, this is probably not the thread to bring this up, but what the hell. Look, I'm not what people would call a 'patriot', nor am I particularly proud of America, its governmental policies or practices, its pre-secondary educational system, or its rampant commercialism, but lately, I have become rather disgusted with the elitist 'American-bashing' that rears its ugly head on these forums far too frequently. Personally, I don't care if you like America as an entity or not, but to lump any one of us who happens to live here into some broad-based stereotypical category such as "lazy", "overweight", or "poorly-educated" is in itself an exercise in intolerance and ignorance. There are those of us who have undertaken to educate ourselves through the best means possible (often well beyond whatever public or private institutions offer us), and there are those of us who have traveled beyond our borders without behaving like the stereotypical American tourist. I understand perfectly that there are those who have made horrible examples (I have witnessed many outside of the states myself), but do not assume that those you meet here are the same in any way. As far as I'm concerned, this practice is no better than racism or sexism. It's nationalism and exclusion at its worst. It's almost become accepted when it applies to Americans, and I find this truly deplorable.
  • LegionnairedLegionnaired Join Date: 2002-04-30 Member: 552Members, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin--AllUrHiveRBelong2Us+Feb 24 2003, 05:02 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (AllUrHiveRBelong2Us @ Feb 24 2003, 05:02 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I eat sarcasm for fuel. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Same. Sometimes for fun, too.
  • moultanomoultano Creator of ns_shiva. Join Date: 2002-12-14 Member: 10806Members, NS1 Playtester, Contributor, Constellation, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue, Reinforced - Shadow, WC 2013 - Gold, NS2 Community Developer, Pistachionauts
    <!--QuoteBegin--Relic25+Feb 24 2003, 08:56 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Relic25 @ Feb 24 2003, 08:56 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Now, this is probably not the thread to bring this up, but what the hell. Look, I'm not what people would call a 'patriot', nor am I particularly proud of America, its governmental policies or practices, its pre-secondary educational system, or its rampant commercialism, but lately, I have become rather disgusted with the elitist 'American-bashing' that rears its ugly head on these forums far too frequently. Personally, I don't care if you like America as an entity or not, but to lump any one of us who happens to live here into some broad-based stereotypical category such as "lazy", "overweight", or "poorly-educated" is in itself an exercise in intolerance and ignorance. There are those of us who have undertaken to educate ourselves through the best means possible (often well beyond whatever public or private institutions offer us), and there are those of us who have traveled beyond our borders without behaving like the stereotypical American tourist. I understand perfectly that there are those who have made horrible examples (I have witnessed many outside of the states myself), but do not assume that those you meet here are the same in any way. As far as I'm concerned, this practice is no better than racism or sexism. It's nationalism and exclusion at its worst. It's almost become accepted when it applies to Americans, and I find this truly deplorable. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    I was considering making a topic on this myself. Amen, brotha! <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • AllUrHiveRblong2usAllUrHiveRblong2us By Your Powers Combined... Join Date: 2002-12-20 Member: 11244Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--Legionnaired+Feb 24 2003, 09:02 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Legionnaired @ Feb 24 2003, 09:02 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--AllUrHiveRBelong2Us+Feb 24 2003, 05:02 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (AllUrHiveRBelong2Us @ Feb 24 2003, 05:02 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I eat sarcasm for fuel. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Same. Sometimes for fun, too. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    yumyum sarcasm!
  • Marik_SteeleMarik_Steele To rule in hell... Join Date: 2002-11-20 Member: 9466Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--Relic25+Feb 24 2003, 08:56 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Relic25 @ Feb 24 2003, 08:56 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> [...]
    The truth is, <i>everyone</i> deserves my respect, <i>until they do something that causes them to lose that respect</i>. It's really that simple. Assuming that any given person (eg: a forum goer, a stranger on the street, etc.) is not worthy of your respect is not only slighting the other person, it could also deprive you of the possibility of learning something valuable from that person.
    [...] <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    100% agreement from me to both Nem's idea and the above thing I quoted. Sarcasm and other rhetorical arguments have their place; insults do not. So long as it is enforced fairly (which, although I don't expect it to ever be a problem, I will still emphasize), I'd like to see this enforced quite literally ASAP.
  • ZerglingZergling Join Date: 2002-11-26 Member: 9977Members
    sounds good nem, but make sure to distinguish between attacking ignorance, and seizing on it to expose the illegitamacy of an arguement.
  • Nemesis_ZeroNemesis_Zero Old European Join Date: 2002-01-25 Member: 75Members, Retired Developer, NS1 Playtester, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->sounds good nem, but make sure to distinguish between attacking ignorance, and seizing on it to expose the illegitamacy of an arguement. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    As I said, this is aimed at insults, not argumentative strategies.



    OK, I'll wait for 24 more hours, if nobody with severe objections steps up till then, I'll rewrite the FAQ to incorporate the new rule.
  • CanadianWolverineCanadianWolverine Join Date: 2003-02-07 Member: 13249Members
    This all reads fine, but how would it play out in action? I know I've ragged specifically on particular posters, trying to cite examples from their posts, as way to express that their views as posted hold a degree of invalidity in my opinion. Hasn't anyone? Sarcasm, silly fictional examples, generalizations, specifications, speculation, pondering, and just plain being over dramatic can all seem personally insulting when you address a specific poster and their post. The only way I see this rule being applicable is in examples such as where an entire post is similar to one of the following:

    "U R DUMB"
    "^ I'm with stupid"
    "WTH? Learn to read and type, dumb ****"
    "Hahahaha, excuse me while I stop laughing"
    "R U 'special' educated?"
    etc
    etc
    etc

    But don't the forum moderators already get to torch these flamable items?
  • SirusSirus Join Date: 2002-11-13 Member: 8466Members, NS1 Playtester, Constellation
    IMO This is desperately needed.


    /me thinks of the Suggestion and Ideas forum

    "OMG NEVER POST THIS YOU STUPID CS MORON POO FACE. YOU ARe TEH DUMB. GO AWAY.
    /MEH HATES TEH CS OMGORZZZZZ. YOU ARE TEEEHH NUB!"

    Its frustrating to see this like all the time.

    So, im an advocate of this =D

    I believe your the mod of the Suggestion forum huh Nem ? ... Such bad karma...
  • RyoOhkiRyoOhki Join Date: 2003-01-26 Member: 12789Members
    edited February 2003
    Well I don't mind this rule coming in, I don't think I've violated it (tell me if I have <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif'><!--endemo--> ). I admit we see a lot of high spirits in here (no wonder with what we discuss). I've seen genuinely uncivil behaviour rarely though. I still think the rule should come in, purely to prevent such occurances.
  • RueRue Join Date: 2002-10-21 Member: 1564Members
    taking the anti-war topic as an example isnt realy a good one cause peoples lifes are at risk so feelings are going to be high. imo the whole anti-war argument is stupid but i wouldnt attack the people trying to get there point heard , so it might be a good rule but a bit hard to enforece <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/confused.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • Nemesis_ZeroNemesis_Zero Old European Join Date: 2002-01-25 Member: 75Members, Retired Developer, NS1 Playtester, Constellation
    There is pretty much no discussion worth discussing that doesn't involve high feelings. If somebody does however go around stating that, for the sake of some examples, "all Americans/anti-war protestors/pro-lifers are un-educated", I could just as well lock the thread, because a calm discussion won't be possible thereafter.
    This isn't exactely flaming in the classical sense, which is why I was reluctant to editing peoples posts on it, but it can be very insulting.
  • FeydToBlackFeydToBlack Join Date: 2003-02-04 Member: 13079Members
    I completly agree with this (it is supposed to be a MATURE discussion anyways).

    Just to let you know in advance, I usually try to flame the quote, not the poster or group.
  • Nemesis_ZeroNemesis_Zero Old European Join Date: 2002-01-25 Member: 75Members, Retired Developer, NS1 Playtester, Constellation
    OK, so it's official. I'll update the FAQ.
This discussion has been closed.