Which Version Of Zergling Is Better
Ghent
Join Date: 2003-02-27 Member: 14080Members
Join Date: 2003-02-27 Member: 14080Members
<div class="IPBDescription">post your opinions here</div> since sooner or later, someone is gonna release a zergling model, i'm just wondering which version of zergling do you guys prefer.
I have been doing some research over this issue. It seems that there are 2 versions of zergling out there.
one version is the regular version that appears in game and in the starcraft game manual. that zergling is kind of fat and short and has a pair of sickles on it's back in addition to it's claws and legs. it mainly use this pair of sickles on the back to slash the target. But i don't really like this version. I think it's kind of ugly and too fat and too short. Zerglings are supposed to be fast and agile. This fat version just doesn't seem to fit the picture.
The 2nd version is the one only appear in all of blizzards in game cinematics. it has a hydralisk's head ( it's exactly the same as hydra's head ) it's front claws are also the smaller versions of those of a hydra's. it has no sickles on it's back. and it's longer and thinner than the previous version. I personally like this version. It just looks cooler and slicker and more agile.
So what do you guys think? feel free to discuss it here, hope some modellers will make one that fit most ppl's consensus. <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif'><!--endemo-->
I have been doing some research over this issue. It seems that there are 2 versions of zergling out there.
one version is the regular version that appears in game and in the starcraft game manual. that zergling is kind of fat and short and has a pair of sickles on it's back in addition to it's claws and legs. it mainly use this pair of sickles on the back to slash the target. But i don't really like this version. I think it's kind of ugly and too fat and too short. Zerglings are supposed to be fast and agile. This fat version just doesn't seem to fit the picture.
The 2nd version is the one only appear in all of blizzards in game cinematics. it has a hydralisk's head ( it's exactly the same as hydra's head ) it's front claws are also the smaller versions of those of a hydra's. it has no sickles on it's back. and it's longer and thinner than the previous version. I personally like this version. It just looks cooler and slicker and more agile.
So what do you guys think? feel free to discuss it here, hope some modellers will make one that fit most ppl's consensus. <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif'><!--endemo-->
Comments
??
i havent played the single player for years, but ill cheat my way thru it to see the cinematics again one day
a good zerg...is a dead zerg
<img src='http://www.blizzard.com/images/ghost/screenshots/ss17.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image'>
<img src='http://www.blizzard.com/images/ghost/screenshots/ss17.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image'> <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
This 1 is nice. <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif'><!--endemo--> <!--emo&::asrifle::--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/asrifle.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='asrifle.gif'><!--endemo-->
A hydralisk has a snake-like "foot" that uses locamotion of the muscles to move. It also has two flaps on it's shoulders that it raises and, using a biological phneumatics (spelling?) system, launches it's spikes from. The elite of the Hydralisks are called "Hunter Killers" which are far tougher and more agile, though their weapons remain the same.