well waco texas for one when his administration killed about 86 people plus 17 children that where in the middle of no where not hurting anybody. This then led to the Oklahoma city bombing.
Somalia where he sent in forces without tanks so 30 soldiers died needlessly.
He raised stuff like the pollution out put standard the last night of his administration so Bush had to lower them other wise our economy would go to waste. He has to look like a vilan from the planeters :/
He friggin debated wether oral sex is sex! WTH? I mean if a teacher gets a hummer from a student he looses his job for sexual misconduct with a student.
Brady Bill. bye bye 2nd amendment <!--emo&:(--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif'><!--endemo--> Let the raping of women beggin
Centralized medical care. Wow good job now any kind of doctor apointment will cost more.
He could have caught Ossama bin laden which would have stoped the 2nd attack on the WTC.
taking money from china for favored nation status.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->well waco texas for one when his administration killed about 86 people plus 17 children that where in the middle of no where not hurting anybody. This then led to the Oklahoma city bombing.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I wouldn't blame this on him but whatever, it was a sitty situation all around.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Somalia where he sent in forces without tanks so 30 soldiers died needlessly.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Correction, Bush sent them in there without tanks, not Clinton. Clinton may not have sent the backup they needed fast enough but it was Bush that put them there in the first place. Also I would point out that when Reagan sent to troops into Lebanon and bungled that operation <b>242</b> soldiers died.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->He raised stuff like the pollution out put standard the last night of his administration so Bush had to lower them other wise our economy would go to waste. He has to look like a vilan from the planeters :/<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Cause we all know how horrible the economy was with Clinton in office. Consider this, Clinton is the <i>only</i> president in the last century that didn't have a recession during his presidency and he was in there for two terms. You can argue that it wasn't his doing that the economy did so well but he certainly didn't screw it up.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->He friggin debated wether oral sex is sex! WTH? I mean if a teacher gets a hummer from a student he looses his job for sexual misconduct with a student.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
As stupid as it sound oral sex is not covered by the legal term "sexual relations". I might add that if the biggest problem with the president is him recieving a consentual **** from another adult then the country is doing pretty well.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Brady Bill. bye bye 2nd amendment Let the raping of women beggin<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Except that violent crime and rape both substantially went down during his term kinda shoots large messy holes in that particular arguement.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Centralized medical care. Wow good job now any kind of doctor apointment will cost more.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm sorry I'm not quite understanding what you're getting at.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->He could have caught Ossama bin laden which would have stoped the 2nd attack on the WTC.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah I seem to recall Clinton executing an airstrike against Osama Bin Laden and immediately being yelled at as just trying to distract people. And if he was such an obvious threat then why didn't Bush do something once he got into office. Why did Bush <i>cut</i> spending on the program that was tracking him. Before 9/11 Clinton spent far far more energy on intelligence gathering and counter-terrorism than Bush did.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->taking money from china for favored nation status.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think that was a **** move too but I don't seem to see Bush trying to rescind that either.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->just to name a few. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Only one of which has any merit and is exactly the same thing Bush is currently doing.
Being that I live in Oklahoma City, and still remember being in spanish class when I heard the boom (we were right next to the airport though, so at the time we thought it was a plane). But still I place sole responsibility in the persons who committed the atrocity, not on what drove them to do it. After all, we don't blame The Beatles for all of Charles Manson's acts...
Still, was a major stupid thing they did in Waco, that should have never happened.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->I wouldn't blame this on him but whatever, it was a sitty situation all around. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
He is the chief executive officer it his job to control the federal agents.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Correction, Bush sent them in there without tanks, not Clinton. Clinton may not have sent the backup they needed fast enough but it was Bush that put them there in the first place. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It wasnt untill 1993 that the conflict escalated and US commander requested armor support. Clinton denied this and resulted in the killing of US soldiers. 42 americans died along with 100 something UN peacekeepers.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Cause we all know how horrible the economy was with Clinton in office. Consider this, Clinton is the only president in the last century that didn't have a recession during his presidency and he was in there for two terms. You can argue that it wasn't his doing that the economy did so well but he certainly didn't screw it up. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
First off we were in were recovering from the 1991 gulf war so the economy had no where really to go but up. Then we had the .com boom that started a large growth in the US. Allen Greenspan did more for the economy then clinton ever did and hes still working for Bush now. Also this wasnt what I was talking about.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Except that violent crime and rape both substantially went down during his term kinda shoots large messy holes in that particular arguement. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah imagine when we have police burning people and beating minorites in low income housing people are to afraid to commit crimes. There werent many violent crimes reported in the Soviet Union either.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Yeah I seem to recall Clinton executing an airstrike against Osama Bin Laden and immediately being yelled at as just trying to distract people. And if he was such an obvious threat then why didn't Bush do something once he got into office. Why did Bush cut spending on the program that was tracking him. Before 9/11 Clinton spent far far more energy on intelligence gathering and counter-terrorism than Bush did. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah they were effective too. If he hadnt tried to kill the president of sudan it prolbably wouldnt have **** off everybody. But hey when people ask WTH we dont have any hard evidence Iraq will attack us niether did clinton that ossama would.
Comments
Somalia where he sent in forces without tanks so 30 soldiers died needlessly.
He raised stuff like the pollution out put standard the last night of his administration so Bush had to lower them other wise our economy would go to waste. He has to look like a vilan from the planeters :/
He friggin debated wether oral sex is sex! WTH? I mean if a teacher gets a hummer from a student he looses his job for sexual misconduct with a student.
Brady Bill. bye bye 2nd amendment <!--emo&:(--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif'><!--endemo--> Let the raping of women beggin
Centralized medical care. Wow good job now any kind of doctor apointment will cost more.
He could have caught Ossama bin laden which would have stoped the 2nd attack on the WTC.
taking money from china for favored nation status.
just to name a few.
I wouldn't blame this on him but whatever, it was a sitty situation all around.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Somalia where he sent in forces without tanks so 30 soldiers died needlessly.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Correction, Bush sent them in there without tanks, not Clinton. Clinton may not have sent the backup they needed fast enough but it was Bush that put them there in the first place. Also I would point out that when Reagan sent to troops into Lebanon and bungled that operation <b>242</b> soldiers died.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->He raised stuff like the pollution out put standard the last night of his administration so Bush had to lower them other wise our economy would go to waste. He has to look like a vilan from the planeters :/<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Cause we all know how horrible the economy was with Clinton in office. Consider this, Clinton is the <i>only</i> president in the last century that didn't have a recession during his presidency and he was in there for two terms. You can argue that it wasn't his doing that the economy did so well but he certainly didn't screw it up.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->He friggin debated wether oral sex is sex! WTH? I mean if a teacher gets a hummer from a student he looses his job for sexual misconduct with a student.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
As stupid as it sound oral sex is not covered by the legal term "sexual relations". I might add that if the biggest problem with the president is him recieving a consentual **** from another adult then the country is doing pretty well.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Brady Bill. bye bye 2nd amendment Let the raping of women beggin<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Except that violent crime and rape both substantially went down during his term kinda shoots large messy holes in that particular arguement.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Centralized medical care. Wow good job now any kind of doctor apointment will cost more.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I'm sorry I'm not quite understanding what you're getting at.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->He could have caught Ossama bin laden which would have stoped the 2nd attack on the WTC.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah I seem to recall Clinton executing an airstrike against Osama Bin Laden and immediately being yelled at as just trying to distract people. And if he was such an obvious threat then why didn't Bush do something once he got into office. Why did Bush <i>cut</i> spending on the program that was tracking him. Before 9/11 Clinton spent far far more energy on intelligence gathering and counter-terrorism than Bush did.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->taking money from china for favored nation status.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think that was a **** move too but I don't seem to see Bush trying to rescind that either.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->just to name a few. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Only one of which has any merit and is exactly the same thing Bush is currently doing.
Still, was a major stupid thing they did in Waco, that should have never happened.
<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
He is the chief executive officer it his job to control the federal agents.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Correction, Bush sent them in there without tanks, not Clinton. Clinton may not have sent the backup they needed fast enough but it was Bush that put them there in the first place. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It wasnt untill 1993 that the conflict escalated and US commander requested armor support. Clinton denied this and resulted in the killing of US soldiers. 42 americans died along with 100 something UN peacekeepers.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Cause we all know how horrible the economy was with Clinton in office. Consider this, Clinton is the only president in the last century that didn't have a recession during his presidency and he was in there for two terms. You can argue that it wasn't his doing that the economy did so well but he certainly didn't screw it up.
<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
First off we were in were recovering from the 1991 gulf war so the economy had no where really to go but up. Then we had the .com boom that started a large growth in the US. Allen Greenspan did more for the economy then clinton ever did and hes still working for Bush now. Also this wasnt what I was talking about.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Except that violent crime and rape both substantially went down during his term kinda shoots large messy holes in that particular arguement.
<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah imagine when we have police burning people and beating minorites in low income housing people are to afraid to commit crimes. There werent many violent crimes reported in the Soviet Union either.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Yeah I seem to recall Clinton executing an airstrike against Osama Bin Laden and immediately being yelled at as just trying to distract people. And if he was such an obvious threat then why didn't Bush do something once he got into office. Why did Bush cut spending on the program that was tracking him. Before 9/11 Clinton spent far far more energy on intelligence gathering and counter-terrorism than Bush did.
<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yeah they were effective too. If he hadnt tried to kill the president of sudan it prolbably wouldnt have **** off everybody. But hey when people ask WTH we dont have any hard evidence Iraq will attack us niether did clinton that ossama would.