A Nice Change Of Pace

JefeJefe Join Date: 2003-04-21 Member: 15734Members, Constellation
in NS General Discussion
<div class="IPBDescription">just looky at the forum :O</div> Has anyone noticed that the forums have been a little less 1.1 lately? I, for one, am glad to see the change. I'm sick of talkin 'bout 1.1.

I would also encourage the devs (like many others have before) to take as much time as they need to make 1.1 the best game it could be. <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif'><!--endemo-->
Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome

Comments

  • SirusSirus Join Date: 2002-11-13 Member: 8466Members, NS1 Playtester, Constellation
    edited May 2003
    I find it amusing that you're talking about ns 1.1 while in the same breath rejoicing that nobody is talking about it and that you're thankful for that...

    (:
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • Ph0enixPh0enix Join Date: 2002-10-08 Member: 1462Members, Constellation
    I don't mind TBH. Obviously the inane threads are annoying and it was shame about the beta forums being closed to members but aside from that the forums where beginning to get a little bit stale.

    The opening of the beta forums and the consequential deluge of info seems to have re-invigorated things.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • Cereal_KillRCereal_KillR Join Date: 2002-10-31 Member: 1837Members
    yeah me too I've been staying more or less away from general discussion lately because ther's almost only 1.1 stuff
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • RedfordRedford Monorailcatfjord Join Date: 2002-04-28 Member: 528Members, NS1 Playtester
    I find it ironic that, with your statement over the displeasure of the number of 1.1 topics, you have brought up a new topic relating to 1.1.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • DenialDenial Join Date: 2003-01-08 Member: 12033Members
    I don't talk about 1.1, I talk about me wanting a 1.05 exploit-fixing serverside patch.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • MoquiaoMoquiao Join Date: 2003-05-09 Member: 16168Members
    i do browse most of the threads around but i ignore the 1.1 ones mainly cos they are old Q's...
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • JefeJefe Join Date: 2003-04-21 Member: 15734Members, Constellation
    I'm mainly referring to the threads about 1.1 controversies and such, balance issues especially. But yes, the irony is still relevant.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • cr3amcr3am Join Date: 2002-11-05 Member: 7221Members
    so, is your name pronouced like: "He-feh"???
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • WindelkronWindelkron Join Date: 2002-04-11 Member: 419Members
    OMG, I was just thinking that before I scrolled down to your post~!

    btw new emoticon! <!--emo&::fade::--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/fade.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='fade.gif'><!--endemo--> <-- rules
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • KenichiKenichi This is not a pie. Join Date: 2002-11-01 Member: 2941Members, NS1 Playtester
    <!--QuoteBegin--Denial+May 29 2003, 07:20 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Denial @ May 29 2003, 07:20 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I don't talk about 1.1, I talk about me wanting a 1.05 exploit-fixing serverside patch. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    not possible, the largest exploits REQUIRED a client patch. ex. Jetpack fuel.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
Sign In or Register to comment.