<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->"Pac Bell is simply recycling many of the same arguments already raised and twice rebutted by a federal court," an RIAA official said. "It's unfortunate that they have chosen to litigate this, unlike every other ISP (Internet service provider) which has complied with their obligations under the law." <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
These tards just keep sounding more and more tyranical.. "IT IS UNFORTUNATE THAT THIS COMPANY DID NOT COMPLY, NOW WE MUST DESTROY!"
Being the person that I am I actually was thinking (note I havent actually read a full copyright), music on a CD or whatever medium the company makes is copyrighted. But when we rip it off that medium and it is no longer on that CD and isn't even the same piece of data or same format of data, is it still technically copyrighted?
SBC is probaby just going after the RIAA because it's the only company they haven't screwed over yet. ANy idea how many phone companies they've bought out?
Comments
These tards just keep sounding more and more tyranical.. "IT IS UNFORTUNATE THAT THIS COMPANY DID NOT COMPLY, NOW WE MUST DESTROY!"