<!--QuoteBegin--(SoD)BOO+Aug 15 2003, 12:59 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> ((SoD)BOO @ Aug 15 2003, 12:59 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> i dont like g4ys, for obvious reason. think about it. if being g4y was ok there shouldnt be anything to defend. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> If being black were okay, there wouldn't be anything to defend about being black either. That whole Civil Rights movement was just a bunch of malarky.
What your post boiled down to was "I hate homos and therefore homos are unnatural and everyone should hate them."
<!--QuoteBegin--AllUrHiveRBelong2Us+Aug 15 2003, 04:13 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (AllUrHiveRBelong2Us @ Aug 15 2003, 04:13 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--Wheeee+Aug 15 2003, 04:11 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Wheeee @ Aug 15 2003, 04:11 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I do argue for a side if nobody else argues for it.
And for the record, I try to keep my personal beliefs out of a discussion. I do take offense at homosexuality, but I do not take offense at the person who practices it (unless they do it just to **** me off) <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> If you don't argue what you believe, and if you argue any side that no one else will, then that means you are just argueing for the sake of argueing. What the hell? <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> When I see fallacious logic, I argue against it.
<!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Celibacy is NOT a realistic option for most people, be they straight or otherwise.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> Would you also say that staying sober is not a realistic option for an alcoholic?
<!--QuoteBegin--Twex+Aug 15 2003, 09:25 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Twex @ Aug 15 2003, 09:25 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Celibacy is NOT a realistic option for most people, be they straight or otherwise.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> Would you also say that staying sober is not a realistic option for an alcoholic? <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> Now this is going too far.
Should any of you not yet have noticed, some members of these boards <i>are</i> homosexuals. I won't tolerate their sexual persuasion being compared to an addiction.
<!--QuoteBegin--Nemesis Zero+Aug 15 2003, 04:33 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Nemesis Zero @ Aug 15 2003, 04:33 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--Twex+Aug 15 2003, 09:25 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Twex @ Aug 15 2003, 09:25 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Celibacy is NOT a realistic option for most people, be they straight or otherwise.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> Would you also say that staying sober is not a realistic option for an alcoholic? <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> Now this is going too far.
Should any of you not yet have noticed, some members of these boards <i>are</i> homosexuals. I won't tolerate their sexual persuasion being compared to an addiction. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> And yet they have free reign to compare disliking homosexuality to racism.
*Sigh* Apart from the fact that there's a slight difference between a misled notion and a psychological and physical illness, this demonstrates very well that a groundwork of rules is necessary to keep such discussions from getting into the grotesque. I'll temp-<span style='color:red'>lock</span> this thread and move or repost it in Disc once it's ready to go.
Comments
If being black were okay, there wouldn't be anything to defend about being black either. That whole Civil Rights movement was just a bunch of malarky.
What your post boiled down to was "I hate homos and therefore homos are unnatural and everyone should hate them."
And for the record, I try to keep my personal beliefs out of a discussion. I do take offense at homosexuality, but I do not take offense at the person who practices it (unless they do it just to **** me off) <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If you don't argue what you believe, and if you argue any side that no one else will, then that means you are just argueing for the sake of argueing. What the hell? <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
When I see fallacious logic, I argue against it.
Would you also say that staying sober is not a realistic option for an alcoholic?
Would you also say that staying sober is not a realistic option for an alcoholic? <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
Now this is going too far.
Should any of you not yet have noticed, some members of these boards <i>are</i> homosexuals. I won't tolerate their sexual persuasion being compared to an addiction.
Would you also say that staying sober is not a realistic option for an alcoholic? <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Now this is going too far.
Should any of you not yet have noticed, some members of these boards <i>are</i> homosexuals. I won't tolerate their sexual persuasion being compared to an addiction. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
And yet they have free reign to compare disliking homosexuality to racism.
Apart from the fact that there's a slight difference between a misled notion and a psychological and physical illness, this demonstrates very well that a groundwork of rules is necessary to keep such discussions from getting into the grotesque. I'll temp-<span style='color:red'>lock</span> this thread and move or repost it in Disc once it's ready to go.