i had problems with research, but thats because the newspaper had done it incorrectly, it should have been something like "rsceareh" but apart from that, the rest was as if it was spel properly. (You was spelt properly, but then they didnt have much choice about that)
<!--QuoteBegin--Z.X. Bogglesteinsky+Sep 22 2003, 12:46 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Z.X. Bogglesteinsky @ Sep 22 2003, 12:46 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> i had problems with research, but thats because the newspaper had done it incorrectly, it should have been something like "rsceareh" but apart from that, the rest was as if it was spel properly. (You was spelt properly, but then they didnt have much choice about that) <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> They may have wanted to say "researcher" - who knows.
Comments
Even if it's modified, teh text is true. I can read it, and my main language isn't english o.0
Some of the words I had to think about, but I read it really easily.
Same things happens when you read upside down.
BUWAHAHAH
(i think you missed out an 's' though)
<!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif'><!--endemo-->
They may have wanted to say "researcher" - who knows.
and its weird seeing that thing from a few weeks ago actually in print.
otto
BUWAHAH YOULL NEVER GET IT! PALINDROMS PWN j00!