Amd Or Intel

DismanDisman Kentucky Join Date: 2003-04-05 Member: 15227Members
edited October 2003 in Off-Topic
<div class="IPBDescription">I'm which to pick?</div> I'm currently running a 1.4 thunderbird and I'm thinking of purchasing a new pc. I'm not to fluent on the cpu's so I was wondering on the communities experiences with the different chipsets. Do you use intel or amd and why? Right now it looks like the pentium IIII's with the 800 mhz front side bus looks good. But now AMD has produced the first 64 bit processor. So which one is the best???

Edit: Boy did I F up the subheading in the title....

Comments

  • LikuLiku I, am the Somberlain. Join Date: 2003-01-10 Member: 12128Members
    Ha, I heard AMD's are better.
  • MulletMullet Join Date: 2003-04-28 Member: 15910Members, Constellation
    the new 64bit amd's are suppose to be good....If I were you, I'd just wait until doom3 comes out.... <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • DismanDisman Kentucky Join Date: 2003-04-05 Member: 15227Members
  • GreyPawsGreyPaws Join Date: 2002-11-15 Member: 8659Members
    Intel, there are a whole bunch of threads on this issue already, I cant be bothered to repeat myself.

    wait till the end of the month, prices are comming down, the get a nice Asus Mobo // P4 2.8 - 3.2 combo with Dual Channel DDR (512 will do you dont need a gig like everyone always says)
  • Siberian_DingoSiberian_Dingo Join Date: 2003-01-15 Member: 12326Members
    edited October 2003
    <!--QuoteBegin--GreyPaws+Oct 8 2003, 05:59 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (GreyPaws @ Oct 8 2003, 05:59 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> 512 will do you dont need a gig like everyone always says <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    are you kiding?!! your life will never be fullfilled till your MOBO is at its top RAM capacity.

    and i like AMD better, i have just had more experiance with them.
  • RPG_JssmfulhudRPG_Jssmfulhud Join Date: 2002-11-02 Member: 4006Members
    AMD CPUs are generally faster than their Intel brothers but are sometimes a bit less compatible with different hardware...
  • QuaunautQuaunaut The longest seven days in history... Join Date: 2003-03-21 Member: 14759Members, Constellation, Reinforced - Shadow
    AMD, but ONLY if your gonna be willing to spend a lot at the moment. They just got the 64-bit thingy out, and its supposed to be so blazing fast, you won't need anything new for another 5 years at least.
  • BigMadSteveBigMadSteve Join Date: 2003-02-12 Member: 13472Members
    I've only used AMD's and I find them to be pretty good. Lol, even when I had the one running at 350Mhz it was OK, now I'm at 1.6Ghz with my new one <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • TenSixTenSix Join Date: 2002-11-09 Member: 7932Members
    Wait till January or so and see how games like HL2 or Doom 3 might run. HL2 is supposed to have a very scaleable engine, so it might just depend on if your willing to shell out some cash for <i>improved</i> graphics (not nessecarily <i>faster</i>, depending on your tweaks).

    I plan to just wait till I can put together a system for $800 that will run HL2 at a solid 60fps or so with everything cranked up (since future mods will be more engine intense, like NS is on the HL engine, you have to overcompensate).
  • esunaesuna Rock Bottom Join Date: 2003-04-03 Member: 15175Members, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin--Quaunaut+Oct 9 2003, 12:08 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Quaunaut @ Oct 9 2003, 12:08 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> AMD, but ONLY if your gonna be willing to spend a lot at the moment. They just got the 64-bit thingy out, and its supposed to be so blazing fast, you won't need anything new for another 5 years at least. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    As far as i'm to understand, no OS or software actually takes advantage of the 64bit chips yet, so right now they will give you a minimal speed boost, but until they're fully supported, they're just overpriced toys.

    And i'm to believe that mac G5's got there with 64bit technology first, although i could be wrong or AMD make chips for macs.


    But it's really a case of how much money you have to spend. I run an AMD, and have done for my last few systems, that's because they're cheap. But to be honest, all the time i've had AMD's there's been at least one Intel in the house, and dispite it being quite a lot more expensive for the same hardware, the performance has been astounding. Intel's chips are very nice, to say the least, and run at a lower temperature than the AMD, but unfortunately that usually costs ~£100 extra for that privalege.

    So in short, if you have the money, go with Intel, but if you can't afford it, then AMD it is. Both are competant chips.
  • CForresterCForrester P0rk(h0p Join Date: 2002-10-05 Member: 1439Members, Constellation
    My recommendation: Intel.

    Sure, AMDs are a bit faster and a bit cheaper. They also run warmer, so you need more cooling. More cooling = more noise. Intels are worth the extra price. They're much more stable, and they'll last you longer. It all comes down to what you want in the end.

    Go with AMD if you're a speed freak, and don't mind extra noise.

    Go with Intel if you want VERY SLIGHTLY less speed, and more reliability.
  • CommunistWithAGunCommunistWithAGun Local Propaganda Guy Join Date: 2003-04-30 Member: 15953Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--Disman+Oct 8 2003, 05:07 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Disman @ Oct 8 2003, 05:07 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I'm currently running a 1.4 thunderbird and I'm thinking of purchasing a new pc. I'm not to fluent on the cpu's so I was wondering on the communities experiences with the different chipsets. Do you use intel or amd and why? Right now it looks like the pentium IIII's with the 800 mhz front side bus looks good. But now AMD has produced the first 64 bit processor. So which one is the best???

    Edit: Boy did I F up the subheading in the title.... <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Heh, Intel's CPUs will ALWAYS be worse than AMD's unless they stop being so wasteful.

    AMD Cpu's get 9 processes done in 1 cycle. Intel's get 6.
    Thats why my AthlonXP2700+ only clocks at 2.17Ghz, but performs as well as an Intel processor at 2.7Ghz.
    If your looking to waste some money on a cpu sporting fast FSB but lacking performance in the actual processing, go intel.
    If your looking to save money on a cpu sporting slower FSB but excellent gaming performance, go AMD.

    Either way make sure you purchase a reccomended motherboard for your specific CPU speed, build, and core.
  • CommunistWithAGunCommunistWithAGun Local Propaganda Guy Join Date: 2003-04-30 Member: 15953Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--CForrester+Oct 9 2003, 01:16 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (CForrester @ Oct 9 2003, 01:16 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> My recommendation: Intel.

    Sure, AMDs are a bit faster and a bit cheaper. They also run warmer, so you need more cooling. More cooling = more noise. Intels are worth the extra price. They're much more stable, and they'll last you longer. It all comes down to what you want in the end.

    Go with AMD if you're a speed freak, and don't mind extra noise.

    Go with Intel if you want VERY SLIGHTLY less speed, and more reliability. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Uh....noise? CPU's don't make noise, and the sink+fan combos that come with most AMD cpu's are silent... <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/confused.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • CForresterCForrester P0rk(h0p Join Date: 2002-10-05 Member: 1439Members, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin--CommunistWithAGun+Oct 9 2003, 05:57 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (CommunistWithAGun @ Oct 9 2003, 05:57 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Uh....noise? CPU's don't make noise, and the sink+fan combos that come with most AMD cpu's are silent... <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/confused.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused.gif'><!--endemo--> <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    If they run warmer, you need more fans to keep it cool. Especially if you're an overclocker. More fans = More noise.
  • CommunistWithAGunCommunistWithAGun Local Propaganda Guy Join Date: 2003-04-30 Member: 15953Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--CForrester+Oct 9 2003, 05:51 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (CForrester @ Oct 9 2003, 05:51 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--CommunistWithAGun+Oct 9 2003, 05:57 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (CommunistWithAGun @ Oct 9 2003, 05:57 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Uh....noise? CPU's don't make noise, and the sink+fan combos that come with most AMD cpu's are silent... <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/confused.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused.gif'><!--endemo--> <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    If they run warmer, you need more fans to keep it cool. Especially if you're an overclocker. More fans = More noise. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    I suppose, but that all depends on the fan you buy...besides, who needs to O/C an AMD <!--emo&;)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • agentpropagentprop Join Date: 2002-11-16 Member: 8961Members
    My personal preference is with intel, mainly cos thats what I'm used to. I've never had any problems with my P1, P3 or P4 machines. I know a friend with AMD and he has had no problems with his either (other than the time he tried putting SDRAM into a DDRRAM slot.)
    It all depends on how much money you have to spend.


    Thats odd.... AMD the first 64bit processor? Intel Itanium anyone?
    <a href='http://www.intel.com/products/server/processors/server/itanium/index.htm?iid=sr+itanium&' target='_blank'>http://www.intel.com/products/server/proce...iid=sr+itanium&</a>
    If someone could clear this up, it would be useful...
Sign In or Register to comment.