Is This American?

Pepe_MuffassaPepe_Muffassa Join Date: 2003-01-17 Member: 12401Members
edited August 2004 in Discussions
<div class="IPBDescription">Elections</div> OK, I found this on drudge - thought it was kinda interesting - and sad. (CNN article).

<span style='font-family:Arial[FONT=Arial'>]International team to monitor presidential election
Observers will be part of OSCE's human rights office
From David de Sola
CNN



WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A team of international observers will monitor the presidential election in November, according to the U.S. State Department.

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe was invited to monitor the election by the State Department. The observers will come from the OSCE's Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.

It will be the first time such a team has been present for a U.S. presidential election.

"The U.S. is obliged to invite us, as all OSCE countries should," spokeswoman Urdur Gunnarsdottir said. "It's not legally binding, but it's a political commitment. They signed a document 10 years ago to ask OSCE to observe elections."

Thirteen Democratic members of the House of Representatives, raising the specter of possible civil rights violations that they said took place in Florida and elsewhere in the 2000 election, wrote to U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan in July, asking him to send observers.

After Annan rejected their request, saying the administration must make the application, the Democrats asked Secretary of State Colin Powell to do so.

The issue was hotly debated in the House, and Republicans got an amendment to a foreign aid bill that barred federal funds from being used for the United Nations to monitor U.S. elections, The Associated Press reported.

In a letter dated July 30 and released last week, Assistant Secretary of State Paul Kelly told the Democrats about the invitation to OSCE, without mentioning the U.N. issue.

"I am pleased that Secretary Powell is as committed as I am to a fair and democratic process," said Democratic Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, who spearheaded the effort to get U.N. observers.

"The presence of monitors will assure Americans that America cares about their votes and it cares about its standing in the world," she said in a news release.

Democratic Rep. Barbara Lee of California agreed.

"This represents a step in the right direction toward ensuring that this year's elections are fair and transparent," she said.

"I am pleased that the State Department responded by acting on this need for international monitors. We sincerely hope that the presence of the monitors will make certain that every person's voice is heard, every person's vote is counted."

OSCE, the world's largest regional security organization, will send a preliminary mission to Washington in September to assess the size, scope, logistics and cost of the mission, Gunnarsdottir said.

The organization, which counts among its missions conflict prevention and postconflict rehabilitation, will then determine how many observers are required and where in the United States they will be sent.

"OSCE-participating [nations] agreed in 1990 to observe elections in one another's countries. The OSCE routinely monitors elections within its 55-state membership, including Europe, Eurasia, Canada and the United States," a State Department spokesman said.

The spokesman said the United States does not have any details on the size and composition of the observers or what countries will provide them.

OSCE, based in Vienna, Austria, has sent more than 10,000 personnel to monitor more than 150 elections and referenda in more than 30 countries during the past decade, Gunnarsdottir said.

In November 2002, OSCE sent 10 observers on a weeklong mission to monitor the U.S. midterm elections. OSCE also sent observers to monitor the California gubernatorial recall election last year.

More recently, OSCE monitored the elections in Northern Ireland in November and in Spain in March.</span>

Comments

  • EEKEEK Join Date: 2004-02-25 Member: 26898Banned
    I don't get it, what do they do? Stand over your shoulder at the voting booth and make fun of what you vote?
  • taboofirestaboofires Join Date: 2002-11-24 Member: 9853Members
    I think the idea is to investigate the conditions at polling places, as well as those officiating over it.

    But I think it's absolutely hilarious that something the US signed about maintaining fair elections has come back at us.
  • StakhanovStakhanov Join Date: 2003-03-12 Member: 14448Members
    There is no shame in having your country's elections monitored. Should it have been done earlier , the current american president would have a better legitimacy.
  • ForlornForlorn Join Date: 2002-11-01 Member: 2634Banned
    wow pathetic

    Our politicians can't trust each other enough to allow elections happen as they have for over... 230 years now? Nice.
  • ekentekent Join Date: 2002-11-08 Member: 7801Members
    Considering the shenanigans that both parties use regarding redistricting, I'm suprised this hasn't happened earlier.
  • The_FinchThe_Finch Join Date: 2002-11-13 Member: 8498Members
    I call breach of sovreignty.

    We already have internal commissions that oversee elections on both the Federal and State levels. Our own commissions have already said that the Florida elections were a total pooch-screw and that other states have problems. Those states have moved to remedy the situation to reduce ballot spoilage and other problems.

    To hell with outside observers. We have observers and any problems are an internal matter for the U.S. to sort out on its own.
  • taboofirestaboofires Join Date: 2002-11-24 Member: 9853Members
    We signed away our sovereignty on this issue, though. But that's what makes it so hilarious. Reminds me of software EULAs.
Sign In or Register to comment.