Did You Vote Yet?
EEK
Join Date: 2004-02-25 Member: 26898Banned
Join Date: 2004-02-25 Member: 26898Banned
I did! Well, actually I voted on Monday.
Voted:
1) Kerry / Edwards (D) for president.
2) Ken Salazar (D) for Colorado senate. Pete Coors ® is a legendary violator of EPA pollution guidelines. This is Colorado, unspoiled wilderness is what we're known for.
3) Kinsey (Green Party) for House seat - Musgrave (D) strongly supported the anti-homosexual marriage bill, and in fact, wrote part of it. Die, you bigoted ****.
3) YES on Colorado Amendment 36 - stated that a percentage of Colorado's electoral vote will go towards a proportional candidate. If Colorado is 5 votes (I don't remember what it's worth), and the vote is 49%/51%, then 3 votes go to the 51%, and 2 votes to the 49%.
4) YES on Colorado Amendment... 35 I believe - Basically it introduces a new tax on cigarettes.
5) NO on a vote to raise taxes to pay for the salaries of hiring two new people to an electoral board. Or something. I forget.
6) Some other trivial stuff like if some judges I don't know should keep their seats.
Therefore, I can now ignore all this stupid banter about presidents since you cannot change my mind <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.natural-selection.org/forums/html//emoticons/biggrin-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Voted:
1) Kerry / Edwards (D) for president.
2) Ken Salazar (D) for Colorado senate. Pete Coors ® is a legendary violator of EPA pollution guidelines. This is Colorado, unspoiled wilderness is what we're known for.
3) Kinsey (Green Party) for House seat - Musgrave (D) strongly supported the anti-homosexual marriage bill, and in fact, wrote part of it. Die, you bigoted ****.
3) YES on Colorado Amendment 36 - stated that a percentage of Colorado's electoral vote will go towards a proportional candidate. If Colorado is 5 votes (I don't remember what it's worth), and the vote is 49%/51%, then 3 votes go to the 51%, and 2 votes to the 49%.
4) YES on Colorado Amendment... 35 I believe - Basically it introduces a new tax on cigarettes.
5) NO on a vote to raise taxes to pay for the salaries of hiring two new people to an electoral board. Or something. I forget.
6) Some other trivial stuff like if some judges I don't know should keep their seats.
Therefore, I can now ignore all this stupid banter about presidents since you cannot change my mind <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.natural-selection.org/forums/html//emoticons/biggrin-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Comments
GO 'your state'!!!
It should be nice without all the long lines they had last time round.
It should be nice without all the long lines they had last time round. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Anyhow I do not believe there is early voting going on in Pennsylvania. I'll just wait and go in on election day, wait through the line and cast vote.
I wanted to vote absentee, but I'm going to wait and go permanent absentee next time around.
hmm, some of the propositions I'm going to vote for...
kerry [he's not bush, not to mention we share similar views on abortion, illegal imigrants, taxing, not to mention his VP is more likeable then dubyas]
senate, I'm probably going for Boxer
1a: closes loophole to prevent state from raiding local gov coffers [yes]
68: "fair share" indians give up 25% of gambling money or slot machines become legal in card rooms and race tracks [no]
umm there are a bunch of other propositions that I will have to read up on in my vote information booklet before I can take a firm stance
3) Kinsey (Green Party) for House seat - Musgrave (D) strongly supported the anti-homosexual marriage bill, and in fact, wrote part of it. Die, you bigoted ****.
6) Some other trivial stuff like if some judges I don't know should keep their seats.
<!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
re: 3 If you were protesting the marriage bill then why not vote Libertarian?
re: 6 Did you vote or abstain from these decisions?
I need to look at the most recent polls for my state. If it's pretty certain Bush will win (which seems likely), then I'll vote for Nader. If it's battleground, or an incredibly doubtful blue, then it's going to Kerry. (NC btw)
Oh, and I voted my absentee ballot for Michigan a few weeks ago for Kerry. I'm actually regretting it and I wish I had voted here in Wisconsin because it's a far closer race. If Bush wins here I think I'll have my friends beat the living snot out of me so it doesn't happen again.
If you lean left, you had a choice between anti-war pro government (close to socalist) Kucinich/Dean to moderate lefties Kerry/Lieberman.
If you lean left, you had a choice between anti-war pro government (close to socalist) Kucinich/Dean to moderate lefties Kerry/Lieberman. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
If Kerry is moderate I am Hillary Clinton.
hence the secret booths and the mail-in ballots...
No one can see what you voted, not even the admin. (I use invision powerboard is how I know this) But it's be interesting to see what the NS population votes as, and by be no-replies would mean there would be no pressure to post or spam that could get flame-like.
Anyone for this idea? I think is sounds great without any risks or negatives that I can see.
No not obviously. And second I don't understand you point. It's not like this is an official election vote of only the pepole of the USA, but rather one that is for the people of the NS.
Maybe I'm not understanding you point but you came off as sounding as just arguing for arguements sake and a bit prejudiced.
My point was that you can't make a "US only" poll here , but why not make one anyway. The question is , will there be more support for Kerry than the Unchained Chambers <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Um... You don't need to log in to vote there (I can go around to every computer with a unique IP down on campus and rack up several hundred votes all for one person)
Our forum <i>is</i> much more reliable and accurate. (maybe even more accurate than the actual election unfortunately)
<!--QuoteBegin--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->but why not make one anyway.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Exactly.
You guys who are just arguing for arguement's sake, why do you care?