Riaa Knows No Bounds
antifreeze
The guy with the goods! Join Date: 2003-05-12 Member: 16232Members, Constellation
in Off-Topic
<div class="IPBDescription">They now sue the dead</div> <a href='http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/05/riaa_sues_the_dead/' target='_blank'>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/05/riaa_sues_the_dead/</a>
<!--QuoteBegin--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Death is no obstacle to feeling the long arm of the Recording Industry ****. of America.
Lawyers representing several record companies have filed suit against an 83 year-old woman who died in December, claiming that she made more than 700 songs available on the internet.
<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteBegin--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Death is no obstacle to feeling the long arm of the Recording Industry ****. of America.
Lawyers representing several record companies have filed suit against an 83 year-old woman who died in December, claiming that she made more than 700 songs available on the internet.
<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Comments
why not just post it and have the forum filter [which represents what the NSF wants censored] handle it?
<!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
why not just post it and have the forum filter [which represents what the NSF wants censored] handle it?
<!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile-fix.gif' /><!--endemo--> <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
Clarification: if it was text, the forum filter would've handled it fine, you're correct.
But it was an image. In retrospect, I should've just changed the tags and made the image URL a clickable link.
i agree.