Sony Sued For Patent Infringment
Rob
Unknown Enemy Join Date: 2002-01-24 Member: 25Members, NS1 Playtester
in Discussions
<div class="IPBDescription">Let's try a lighter topic...</div> Sony's been ordered to pay $90.7 Million in damages of patent infringment of feedback hardware, presumably for the duel shock control. Moreover, courts have ordered Sony to cease sales of PS2's in the U.S. This is the whole package: systems, controllers, and games that violate the patent. That doesn't leave much left to play...
<!--QuoteBegin-MyWay Article+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (MyWay Article)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->San Jose-based Immersion Corp. (IMMR) sued Sony in 2002, claiming it violated two of its patents. A federal jury in Oakland decided in favor of Immersion in September and ordered Sony to pay $82 million in damages. On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken affirmed the decision - tacking on $8.7 million in interest.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<a href='http://apnews.myway.com//article/20050328/D8947J5G0.html' target='_blank'>http://apnews.myway.com//article/20050328/D8947J5G0.html</a>
Discuss.
<!--QuoteBegin-MyWay Article+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (MyWay Article)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->San Jose-based Immersion Corp. (IMMR) sued Sony in 2002, claiming it violated two of its patents. A federal jury in Oakland decided in favor of Immersion in September and ordered Sony to pay $82 million in damages. On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken affirmed the decision - tacking on $8.7 million in interest.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<a href='http://apnews.myway.com//article/20050328/D8947J5G0.html' target='_blank'>http://apnews.myway.com//article/20050328/D8947J5G0.html</a>
Discuss.
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
To me it sounds like company A is trying to get a pattent on "vibration" - where company B tried to make a controler that "shakes".
I mean, honesly, shaking controllers is a "next step" in the evolution of hand held input divices. So long as the mechanizm for shaking is different, I'm not sure that a pattent has been infringed on. If that isn't the case, then those in the adult paraphanalia industry should sue both companies...
In other news, muslims are sueing the USA for every capitol building for patent infringement on the "dome" building structure. In order to rectify the situation, all archetecture and building must cease until we pay... 1 billion dollars!