Amd Opteron Setup...
Boris
Join Date: 2002-12-30 Member: 11636Members
<div class="IPBDescription">Are these chips good?</div> I know I could search elsewhere, but I find some of the people here fairly knowledgable and I want to know how these chips would work for NS servers.
Basically I'm looking at maybe just buying my own server to co-locate somewhere.
I have checked out some different setups, and it appears I can get a dual opteron MSI board, and single opteron 200 series at a decent price (upgrade to dual when needed).
I was looking at the prices of the opterons, and it seems that the 1.8GHz model (model 244) is the most economical for price vs power.
<!--QuoteBegin-From AMD website April 06+ 2005--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (From AMD website April 06 @ 2005)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->AMD Opteron™ Processor - Multiprocessors
100 Models Price 200 Models Price 800 Models Price
Model 152 $637 Model 252 $851 Model 852 $1,514
Model 150 $417 Model 250 $690 Model 850 $1,165
Model 148 $278 Model 248 $455 Model 848 $873
Model 146 $218 Model 246 $316 Model 846 $698
Model 144 $178 Model 244 $209 Model 844 $698
Model 142 $163 Model 242 $163 Model 842 $698
Model 140 $163 Model 240 $163 Model 840 $698
Model 146 HE $278 Model 246 HE $455 Model 846 HE $873
Model 140 EE $278 Model 240 EE $455 Model 840 EE $873<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Is this 1.8GHz chip equivalent to what a 1.8GHz Xeon would be? Or is this GHz rating quite different for AMD (just like their Athlon XP 3000s for instance, which run @ 2167 MHz) and this chip runs more like a 2.8GHz Xeon.
Any clarification on the issue would be great. And does anyone use these for their NS servers?
Basically I'm looking at maybe just buying my own server to co-locate somewhere.
I have checked out some different setups, and it appears I can get a dual opteron MSI board, and single opteron 200 series at a decent price (upgrade to dual when needed).
I was looking at the prices of the opterons, and it seems that the 1.8GHz model (model 244) is the most economical for price vs power.
<!--QuoteBegin-From AMD website April 06+ 2005--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (From AMD website April 06 @ 2005)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->AMD Opteron™ Processor - Multiprocessors
100 Models Price 200 Models Price 800 Models Price
Model 152 $637 Model 252 $851 Model 852 $1,514
Model 150 $417 Model 250 $690 Model 850 $1,165
Model 148 $278 Model 248 $455 Model 848 $873
Model 146 $218 Model 246 $316 Model 846 $698
Model 144 $178 Model 244 $209 Model 844 $698
Model 142 $163 Model 242 $163 Model 842 $698
Model 140 $163 Model 240 $163 Model 840 $698
Model 146 HE $278 Model 246 HE $455 Model 846 HE $873
Model 140 EE $278 Model 240 EE $455 Model 840 EE $873<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Is this 1.8GHz chip equivalent to what a 1.8GHz Xeon would be? Or is this GHz rating quite different for AMD (just like their Athlon XP 3000s for instance, which run @ 2167 MHz) and this chip runs more like a 2.8GHz Xeon.
Any clarification on the issue would be great. And does anyone use these for their NS servers?
Comments
You can't compare clockspeeds between different processor types.
I was looking at some benchmarks:
<a href='http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.html?i=1935&p=1' target='_blank'>http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.html?i=1935&p=1</a>
<a href='http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030422/' target='_blank'>http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030422/</a>
These articles are pretty old, but they show the Opteron doing quite well when compared to the Xeon. I don't have any personal experience with server performance, so I can't give you a definitive answer.
Before purchasing a server you need to ask yourself a few questions. Is there any reason I need to run Opteron processors instead of using the cheaper Athlon 64 chips? Do I really need to have a dual processor system since HLDS is not a threaded process? Do I have the bandwidth to run multiple high-capacity servers if I do get a Dual-proc system?
Maybe that will help guide you a bit.
Bandwidth will not be an issue, as this type of server will not be sitting at my house, it will be colocated into a datacenter somewhere nearby my home.
As for HLDS not using dual procs, the idea is let the OS handle a HLDS (or two) for each proc. As I understand, this is fairly easy to do on an operating such as windows 2003 server which supports multiple procs.
I was kinda looking at the possibility of expansion versus a whole new system when I want more HLDS servers (should be cheaper, right?), that's why I was looking at dual procs. There are the MP's, the Opterons, and does any of the others have fairly reasonable priced dual setups? Can the Athlon 64's be dual? I am quite fond of AMD as they have been very good in recent years and the price for power is way better than Intel.
I will investigate furthur, but any info you guys know of, do help me out...
*NOTE: I'm not going straight to a dual proc system, rather I will have a dual proc setup and when time comes, drop the second CPU in and more RAM.