Google Whacking

Comprox

Ok, I've seen this around once or twice and decided to try it: Google Whacking

You take 2 correctly spelled english words and type them into google. Your goal is to get a result of 0. Now, of course you can run over to dictionary.com and pick the name of the 156th rock spieces and mix it with antidisablah and get 0, but that's not too fun either. Try and use words you would understand, or at least the average young adult would recognize. Given a few minutes, this is the best I can do so far:

Results 1 - 10 of about 101 for expunge copacetic. (0.17 seconds)
Results 1 - 10 of about 39 for copacetic turbid. (0.19 seconds)

Also, please use the edit button if you find 5 of them quickly, we don't need this post filled with 5 posts of yours alomost in a row, thanks!

EDIT - for a greater challange, as Hopelessness said in IRC. Try and get 1 result. That sounds too scary for me!

Cold_NiTe

This is fun. But you have to hand it to Comprox, he obvious blew it when it comes to hiding the fact that he has nothing but time on his hands. <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif' /><!--endemo-->

Quiet you <b>apocalypse philistines</b>!
Come everyone, let's go to the <b>frenetic volcano</b>!
Join me in this <b>biological breakdance</b>.

Oh my. That last one... Oh my.

:: EDIT ::

Biological Breakdance... that sounds like some kind of horrendous pick up line.

Geminosity

trying to get only 1 result is proper googlewhacking. Your post is the first I've heard of getting zero being accepted as 'googlewhackery :3

me and some friends sat down and got a few. Kinda surprising how little time it takes for each of us to get one ^^

RaydenUni

p-adic percolator = 1
p-adic pontiff = 1

P-adic numbers is a discrete math class currently being taught at my university.

Cold_NiTe

<!--QuoteBegin-RaydenUni+May 4 2005, 03:14 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (RaydenUni @ May 4 2005, 03:14 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> p-adic percolator = 1
p-adic pontiff = 1

P-adic numbers is a discrete math class currently being taught at my university. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
Way 2 cheat.

Hopelessness

Yes, the correct way is to try and get a single result.

Hence the one I just found in the last few minutes was:
exarticulation luxating

Rellix

<!--QuoteBegin-Geminosity+May 4 2005, 09:08 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Geminosity @ May 4 2005, 09:08 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> trying to get only 1 result is proper googlewhacking. Your post is the first I've heard of getting zero being accepted as 'googlewhackery :3

me and some friends sat down and got a few. Kinda surprising how little time it takes for each of us to get one ^^ <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yup, anyone ever seen Dave Gorman's Googlewack adventure, well worth getting.