Judge Larry Joe will have none of their shenanigans, he PWNZ all lawyers. <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif' /><!--endemo--> Texas Justice!
<img src='http://www.worldbank.org/endofyear2004/images/photo-corruption.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' /> Corruption is the bane of judges.
Edit: Oh, and when we have two people replying to the same picture, let's go with the picture the first guy posts, yeah? He WAS faster, and the other guy should have checked for new posts before submitting his own.
Judge Larry Joe on the take? How dare you! *sobs uncontrollably* <!--emo&:(--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/sad-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
<!--QuoteBegin-lolfighter+Jun 4 2005, 10:48 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (lolfighter @ Jun 4 2005, 10:48 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Oh, and when we have two people replying to the same picture, let's go with the picture the first guy posts, yeah? He WAS faster, and the other guy should have checked for new posts before submitting his own. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> Not possible. I ALWAYS refresh right before posting, even having my image ready to link. It .... just ... happens .. sometimes man.
<!--QuoteBegin-Depot+Jun 5 2005, 04:49 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Depot @ Jun 5 2005, 04:49 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Not possible. I ALWAYS refresh right before posting, even having my image ready to link. It .... just ... happens .. sometimes man.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> I just click "Preview Post" and check whether there are any new posts since the one I'm replying to, then click "Add Reply" right away if there aren't. Even less chance for a mishap. I'm not complaining about the mishaps, they're bound to happen. But it should be common courtesy to reply to the first post, not the second one.
<!--QuoteBegin-lolfighter+Jun 4 2005, 10:53 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (lolfighter @ Jun 4 2005, 10:53 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-Depot+Jun 5 2005, 04:49 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Depot @ Jun 5 2005, 04:49 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Not possible. I ALWAYS refresh right before posting, even having my image ready to link. It .... just ... happens .. sometimes man.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> I just click "Preview Post" and check whether there are any new posts since the one I'm replying to, then click "Add Reply" right away if there aren't. Even less chance for a mishap. I'm not complaining about the mishaps, they're bound to happen. But it should be common courtesy to reply to the first post, not the second one. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> About 4 times in this thread it happened, in spite of my cautions.
<img src='http://home.swipnet.se/~w-56832/bond/q.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' /> "This here pen will explode if you click it three times in a row." It would be a small thing for him to make it once instead...
Edit: <!--QuoteBegin-Depot+Jun 5 2005, 04:54 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Depot @ Jun 5 2005, 04:54 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->About 4 times in this thread it happened, in spite of my cautions.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> Look, I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing here. Let me explain what I mean:
Person A posts a picture. B starts writing a reply to it. While B is writing, C starts writing a reply - also to A, since B hasn't posted yet. While C is still writing, B posts. C posts when he is done. We now have two replies to A - B and C, in that order. What I am saying is that since B was faster (and cannot have been at fault - nobody had posted yet at the time he did, while C might (or might not) have been able to spot B's reply in time), his is the post that the next person, D, should reply to. Especially since D is aware of the whole situation: D cannot have seen C's post before B's post, so he chose to ignore B's post. B was essentially punished for being faster. What I am asking, quite simply, is that when you are D, please reply to B's post.
<!--QuoteBegin-lolfighter+Jun 4 2005, 10:56 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (lolfighter @ Jun 4 2005, 10:56 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--><img src='http://home.swipnet.se/~w-56832/bond/q.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' /> "This here pen will explode if you click it three times in a row." It would be a small thing for him to make it once instead...
Edit: <!--QuoteBegin-Depot+Jun 5 2005, 04:54 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Depot @ Jun 5 2005, 04:54 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->About 4 times in this thread it happened, in spite of my cautions.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> Look, I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing here. Let me explain what I mean:
Person A posts a picture. B starts writing a reply to it. While B is writing, C starts writing a reply - also to A, since B hasn't posted yet. While C is still writing, B posts. C posts when he is done. We now have two replies to A - B and C, in that order. What I am saying is that since B was faster (and cannot have been at fault - nobody had posted yet at the time he did, while C might (or might not) have been able to spot B's reply in time), his is the post that the next person, D, should reply to. Especially since D is aware of the whole situation: D cannot have seen C's post before B's post, so he chose to ignore B's post. B was essentially punished for being faster. What I am asking, quite simply, is that when you are D, please reply to B's post.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> Naw, I don't think so - much ado about nothing. If the replies are within a minute, or even 2 of each other I'd say the user made an effort to be current. If you're in the mood for criticizing, scan this thread again and note all of the links rather than images. Makes the thread very difficult to follow.
This thread has done a MUCh better than the one opened last night, and may actually survive IF it procedes as it has thus far. Let's keep it clean guys and dolls, don't use the forums bandwidth, and stick to the posting rules.
About the pen image - I'm at a loss, particularly with that caption. Is this image in the hunt, or did you just post it to post it?
I'm sorry, I thought my caption made it clear enough: That's Q, the guy who designs Bond's gadgets. Now, I think that ball pen was the one he used in Golden Eye (and for the sake of the argument, we'll say it is): It worked like an ordinary ball pen, wrote and everything. But if you clicked it three times in a row it'd explode after a short delay unless clicked it again to dearm it. Now, it would be easy for Q to re-purpose it to arm with only a single click, causing Bond to blow himself up the very first time he used it.
Okay, it's a magic card. I couldn't resist. I found it while searching for censorship. YES, it's a magic card. Ignore that part and just go with the censorship part, okay? I'm not posting the same card five times, am I? Okay okay, I'm leaving. Don't touch me. I'm leaving alright?
A 16 inch shell should make short work of that thing though. <img src='http://www.williammaloney.com/Dad/WWII/BattleshipNewJersey/16InchShell.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
What you can't see CAN hurt you. <!--emo&:0--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wow.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wow.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Comments
<img src='http://www.wb16.com/images/programs/shows/27.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
Corruption is the bane of judges.
Edit: Oh, and when we have two people replying to the same picture, let's go with the picture the first guy posts, yeah? He WAS faster, and the other guy should have checked for new posts before submitting his own.
<span style='color:red'>*** post marked for baleetination ***</span>
Not possible. I ALWAYS refresh right before posting, even having my image ready to link. It .... just ... happens .. sometimes man.
<img src='http://www.bttw.co.uk/stills/images/0183.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
I just click "Preview Post" and check whether there are any new posts since the one I'm replying to, then click "Add Reply" right away if there aren't. Even less chance for a mishap. I'm not complaining about the mishaps, they're bound to happen. But it should be common courtesy to reply to the first post, not the second one.
I just click "Preview Post" and check whether there are any new posts since the one I'm replying to, then click "Add Reply" right away if there aren't. Even less chance for a mishap. I'm not complaining about the mishaps, they're bound to happen. But it should be common courtesy to reply to the first post, not the second one. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
About 4 times in this thread it happened, in spite of my cautions.
"This here pen will explode if you click it three times in a row."
It would be a small thing for him to make it once instead...
Edit:
<!--QuoteBegin-Depot+Jun 5 2005, 04:54 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Depot @ Jun 5 2005, 04:54 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->About 4 times in this thread it happened, in spite of my cautions.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Look, I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing here. Let me explain what I mean:
Person A posts a picture. B starts writing a reply to it. While B is writing, C starts writing a reply - also to A, since B hasn't posted yet. While C is still writing, B posts. C posts when he is done.
We now have two replies to A - B and C, in that order. What I am saying is that since B was faster (and cannot have been at fault - nobody had posted yet at the time he did, while C might (or might not) have been able to spot B's reply in time), his is the post that the next person, D, should reply to. Especially since D is aware of the whole situation: D cannot have seen C's post before B's post, so he chose to ignore B's post. B was essentially punished for being faster.
What I am asking, quite simply, is that when you are D, please reply to B's post.
"This here pen will explode if you click it three times in a row."
It would be a small thing for him to make it once instead...
Edit:
<!--QuoteBegin-Depot+Jun 5 2005, 04:54 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Depot @ Jun 5 2005, 04:54 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->About 4 times in this thread it happened, in spite of my cautions.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Look, I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing here. Let me explain what I mean:
Person A posts a picture. B starts writing a reply to it. While B is writing, C starts writing a reply - also to A, since B hasn't posted yet. While C is still writing, B posts. C posts when he is done.
We now have two replies to A - B and C, in that order. What I am saying is that since B was faster (and cannot have been at fault - nobody had posted yet at the time he did, while C might (or might not) have been able to spot B's reply in time), his is the post that the next person, D, should reply to. Especially since D is aware of the whole situation: D cannot have seen C's post before B's post, so he chose to ignore B's post. B was essentially punished for being faster.
What I am asking, quite simply, is that when you are D, please reply to B's post.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Naw, I don't think so - much ado about nothing. If the replies are within a minute, or even 2 of each other I'd say the user made an effort to be current. If you're in the mood for criticizing, scan this thread again and note all of the links rather than images. Makes the thread very difficult to follow.
This thread has done a MUCh better than the one opened last night, and may actually survive IF it procedes as it has thus far. Let's keep it clean guys and dolls, don't use the forums bandwidth, and stick to the posting rules.
About the pen image - I'm at a loss, particularly with that caption. Is this image in the hunt, or did you just post it to post it?
Ethyl ether > N02 <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
First of all, pet peeve. That's dimethyl ether.
On topic...
Not even Q can escape death:
<img src='http://www.ameliaclark.com/a-grim_reaper.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
This Q can escape anything!
<img src='http://www.ralphmag.org/1/letter-R-186x184.gif' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
R is the next letter in the alphabet, and thus outranks Q.
So much for the written word.
<img src='http://www.wizards.com/global/images/magic/unglued/Censorship.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
... censorship makes short work of it!
Okay, it's a magic card. I couldn't resist. I found it while searching for censorship. YES, it's a magic card. Ignore that part and just go with the censorship part, okay? I'm not posting the same card five times, am I? Okay okay, I'm leaving. Don't touch me. I'm leaving alright?
Your censorship is ruined!
So my censorship is ruined, eh? Well,
<img src='http://www.ed.gov/inits/backtoschool/images/scissors.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
so is your card!
This one speaks for itself.
Flattend.
Edit: Well the rock didnt stand much of a chance either.
<img src='http://www.williammaloney.com/Dad/WWII/BattleshipNewJersey/16InchShell.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
No attached images please...
Torpedo sinks the ship that fires the 16in shells.
Sonar Detects the Submarine.
The Red October is undetectable by sonar.
<a href='http://www.imageshack.us' target='_blank'><img src='http://img189.echo.cx/img189/531/subaground28gh.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' /></a>
Welder repairs the sub.
Welder's flash> Welder
What you can't see CAN hurt you. <!--emo&:0--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wow.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wow.gif' /><!--endemo-->
<img src='http://www.greenapple.com/~jorp/amzanim/hac-brs.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
and leave you to suffer
<img src='http://www.crazynews.net/images/spiderbite/day9.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
A medkit will easily fix up any open gash.