Can Sata Ports Burn Out?
NumbersNotFound
Join Date: 2002-11-07 Member: 7556Members
in Off-Topic
<div class="IPBDescription">Or straight HD failure?</div> I was just working on a computer that crashed 100% (while playing NS, no doubt)
A simple restart showed that no hard drive was recognized. On a whim, i checked all connections, saw the drive was spinning up, then tried another SATA port on the mobo and it seems to work (in the process of backing up the drive)
But I ask, has anyone ever heard of an SATA port just.. going bad? Or does this have to be the hard drive?
A simple restart showed that no hard drive was recognized. On a whim, i checked all connections, saw the drive was spinning up, then tried another SATA port on the mobo and it seems to work (in the process of backing up the drive)
But I ask, has anyone ever heard of an SATA port just.. going bad? Or does this have to be the hard drive?
Comments
Not to mention that SATA is actually marginally slower than IDE drives, overall. The only point where they get to be between 2-5% faster is on single files exceeding 2GB. <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
But then... everyone wants the new shiny. It must be better... it costs fifty bucks more!
I thought that so far, the only reason sata is not faster is because they're not native. The cleaner-looking cables is more than enough a reason for me to pay 5 more bucks if the performance is equivalent. (Round IDE's cost probably already more than 5 bucks and are bigger than SATA cables)
The motherboard i was looking at had SATA ports, plus the PSU i was getting had SATA power connectors.
Plus, they free up my IDE ports and reduce case clutter. The SATA drive was very little more, too.
But i'm sure you've thought of all of this, oh Enlightened One.