Jackson Not Guilty

enf0rcerenf0rcer intrigued... Join Date: 2003-03-16 Member: 14584Members
in Off-Topic
<div class="IPBDescription">all charges</div> Like the topic states.. anyone can be bought for a price. <!--emo&;)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wink-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
«1

Comments

  • myrigthmyrigth Join Date: 2003-02-08 Member: 13270Members
    Smooth criminal, tbh.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • AlienCowAlienCow Join Date: 2003-09-20 Member: 21040Members
    He's a freak but he may not have done what these other little money-grabbing freaks claim. Still a freak. Freaks all round I say.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • AllUrHiveRblong2usAllUrHiveRblong2us By Your Powers Combined... Join Date: 2002-12-20 Member: 11244Members
    And the E! network swiftly implodes.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • TommyVercettiTommyVercetti Join Date: 2003-02-10 Member: 13390Members, Constellation, Reinforced - Shadow
    Now that we all know, any parent who lets their young boy go anywhere near this man should be shot on site.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • CommunistWithAGunCommunistWithAGun Local Propaganda Guy Join Date: 2003-04-30 Member: 15953Members
    $>*
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • Cereal_KillRCereal_KillR Join Date: 2002-10-31 Member: 1837Members
    You can't trust kids. A renowned popstar obviously is to be trusted.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • FacTorFacTor Wyoming, MI Join Date: 2002-12-17 Member: 10916Members
    ...Such biased people around here. I personally never seen him as guilty, or even homosexual.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • Leaderz0rzLeaderz0rz Join Date: 2002-11-09 Member: 7847Members
    and kids will say whatever their parents want. "hey jimmy say this man touched you here and i'll buy you whatever you want" kids arn't innocent anymore and their minds can be tainted by anyone with influence. To be honest he is an easy target seeing as how he has a place called netherland...i think he is a freak but that doesn't mean he is a pedo.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • XythXyth Avatar Join Date: 2003-11-04 Member: 22312Members
    So now we know, that just because you molest children doesn't make you a pedophile <!--emo&;)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wink-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->

    Okay okay, I'm being biased on purpose.

    In his defence though, heh <i>DID</i> make thriller...
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • Cereal_KillRCereal_KillR Join Date: 2002-10-31 Member: 1837Members
    Well I don't know whether he's guilty or not, hell all I know about him is that he has a skin problem and has someone carry an umbrella for him everywhere. But for some reason the way that the case turned out, I'm somehow... surprised.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • ScribblesScribbles Join Date: 2003-11-05 Member: 22323Members
    <!--QuoteBegin-Leaderz0rz+Jun 13 2005, 04:35 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Leaderz0rz @ Jun 13 2005, 04:35 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> To be honest he is an easy target seeing as how he has a place called netherland.... <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    What? The Netherlands are owned by Michael Jackson? O_o


    <b>NEVAR</b>
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • AllUrHiveRblong2usAllUrHiveRblong2us By Your Powers Combined... Join Date: 2002-12-20 Member: 11244Members
    pwned
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • pardzhpardzh Join Date: 2002-10-25 Member: 1601Members
    Michael Jackson was on trial? Really? I had no idea... sparse media coverage, ya know?
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • OttoDestructOttoDestruct Join Date: 2002-11-08 Member: 7790Members
    If I had a time machine I would go back and bring the cool Thriller michael here to beat the crap out of the weirdo Michael..... on topic... woo? Good for him? I couldn't care either way it ruled.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • Kouji_SanKouji_San Sr. Hινε Uρкεερεг - EUPT Deputy The Netherlands Join Date: 2003-05-13 Member: 16271Members, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue
    <!--QuoteBegin-Scribbles+Jun 13 2005, 11:44 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Scribbles @ Jun 13 2005, 11:44 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-Leaderz0rz+Jun 13 2005, 04:35 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Leaderz0rz @ Jun 13 2005, 04:35 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> To be honest he is an easy target seeing as how he has a place called netherland.... <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    What? The Netherlands are owned by Michael Jackson? O_o


    <b>NEVAR</b> <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Everyone knows that The Netherlands > All and are actually mine.

    But on a more serious note. MJ is not guilty, cause the law says so. Besided the acusers didnt have a case at all. Most of it was based on made up stuff and unable to prove stuff. So yeah MJ FTW
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • Nil_IQNil_IQ Join Date: 2003-04-15 Member: 15520Members
    <!--QuoteBegin-OttoDestruct+Jun 13 2005, 04:51 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (OttoDestruct @ Jun 13 2005, 04:51 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> If I had a time machine I would go back and bring the cool Thriller michael here to beat the crap out of the weirdo Michael..... on topic... woo? Good for him? I couldn't care either way it ruled. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    New Michael would impale old Michael with his nose.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • OttoDestructOttoDestruct Join Date: 2002-11-08 Member: 7790Members
    <!--QuoteBegin-Nil IQ+Jun 13 2005, 04:52 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Nil IQ @ Jun 13 2005, 04:52 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-OttoDestruct+Jun 13 2005, 04:51 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (OttoDestruct @ Jun 13 2005, 04:51 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> If I had a time machine I would go back and bring the cool Thriller michael here to beat the crap out of the weirdo Michael..... on topic... woo? Good for him? I couldn't care either way it ruled. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    New Michael would impale old Michael with his nose. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    And then old michael would raise from the dead, do the crazy thriller hands, raise an army of zombies, then kill new michael.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • BukakkeSakeBukakkeSake Join Date: 2004-05-19 Member: 28767Members
    whats the first thing everyone thought when they saw that michael jackson was on trial for another child molestation charge? Guilty

    Without even looking at the evidence and not one of us has seen ALL the evidence, arguements and such the jury would see.

    Hes the perfect target for people looking for money. You want to talk about michael jackson buying his not guilty verdict, but I think the deck was stacked against him.

    Its not farfetched at all for the jackson defense to portray that woman as a con artist.
    Alot of people are like that nowadays, dishonest to the core so I am willing to give jackson the benefit of the doubt.

    Im sure the civil trial where the parent "Sues for damages" that is, the price of her son's virginity which im sure will reach up therer in the mult-millions is next.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • BadKarmaBadKarma The Advanced Literature monsters burned my house and gave me a 7 Join Date: 2002-11-12 Member: 8260Members
    Wonder if this happened to one of the common folks who seem to worship him. How many days in court? Couple weeks?
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • OlmyOlmy Join Date: 2003-05-08 Member: 16142Members, NS1 Playtester, Contributor, NS2 Developer, NS2 Map Tester, Reinforced - Diamond
    edited June 2005
    Didn't she sue a company previously and lose? She sounds like an emotionally unstable sociopath tbh.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • SinSpawnSinSpawn Harbinger of Suffering Join Date: 2002-11-12 Member: 8359Members
    What have they done....they have doomed us all...we can only hope now...
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • SpacerSpacer Invented dogs Join Date: 2003-05-02 Member: 16008Members
    <!--QuoteBegin-myrigth+Jun 13 2005, 04:22 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (myrigth @ Jun 13 2005, 04:22 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Smooth criminal, tbh. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    DAMN YOU FOR STEALING MY JOKE.

    Also, who cares. Jackson didn't get into prison for child molestation, he'll get into it thanks to the IRS if his cashflow keeps going like it is.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • CMEastCMEast Join Date: 2002-05-19 Member: 632Members
    I personally think that he may well have a 'thing' for little boys, just look at his house, his past, his naked statues of small boys...

    However, that doesn't necessarily mean he did/does anything about it. Can someone be convicted for a thought?
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • SkulkBaitSkulkBait Join Date: 2003-02-11 Member: 13423Members
    Jackson had a pretty f'd up childhood, its not far fetched to believe that hes just a weird SOB and not a child molester. Which, BTW, is what his crime would be, being a pedophile isn't illegal.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • LikuLiku I, am the Somberlain. Join Date: 2003-01-10 Member: 12128Members
    <!--QuoteBegin-Xyth+Jun 13 2005, 02:37 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Xyth @ Jun 13 2005, 02:37 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> In his defence though, heh <i>DID</i> make thriller... <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Chappelle? I agree.

    Jackson ruled once, it's sad what's happened to him.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • illuminexilluminex Join Date: 2004-03-13 Member: 27317Members, Constellation
    In all seriousness, the case was lacking enough real evidence. You can't convict someone just because of popular opinion. While I think that he needs to resolve alot of personal issues, I'm still not convinced of his guilt. It's all too easy to call an adult that is unable to deal with other adults and actively interacts on a peer level with children, a pedophile.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • DepotDepot The ModFather Join Date: 2002-11-09 Member: 7956Members
    <!--QuoteBegin-illuminex+Jun 13 2005, 08:59 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (illuminex @ Jun 13 2005, 08:59 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> In all seriousness, the case was lacking enough real evidence. You can't convict someone just because of popular opinion. While I think that he needs to resolve alot of personal issues, I'm still not convinced of his guilt. It's all too easy to call an adult that is unable to deal with other adults and actively interacts on a peer level with children, a pedophile. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    QFT. Well put illuminex.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • Splinter_SteveSplinter_Steve Join Date: 2005-03-20 Member: 45881Members
    Yeah, the accusing family was successfully portrayed as a bunch of cons by the defense, apparently they've tried this sort of thing before. I side with MJ TBH, but the MJ jokes just never get old.

    Either way he could've (that's assuming he didn't already) bought his own freedom. OJ...MJ...I'm thinking the Chewbacca theory was involved, but that's just me.

    Oh yeah, apparently some people died in some Middle Eastern country. Ahh well, who cares, the MJ thing has a huge impact on my life, and has anyone seen Britney Spears lately? Man, important stuff, I'll tell ya.
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • JimBowenJimBowen Join Date: 2003-05-30 Member: 16873Members, Constellation
    I quote jackson at the start of his trial.

    "I swear on the popes life I didnt touch those kids"

    And time has proven him correct!
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
  • DrSuredeathDrSuredeath Join Date: 2002-11-11 Member: 8217Members
    <a href='http://movies2.nytimes.com/gst/movies/movie.html?v_id=151905' target='_blank'>http://movies2.nytimes.com/gst/movies/movie.html?v_id=151905</a>

    Indictment: The McMartin Trial.

    Directed by Mick Jackson.

    Coincidence?
    Off Topic Disagree Agree Awesome
Sign In or Register to comment.