<!--quoteo(post=2058449:date=Jan 9 2013, 12:41 PM:name=rebirth)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (rebirth @ Jan 9 2013, 12:41 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2058449"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Moving the required votes simply from 2 to 3 does make the trolling harder but only by a small margin.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
My guess is that it's more scarce to find 2 other buddies that have time to waste to mess up a server than 1. My other guess is that it is very simple to implement versus a ratio (wich is better, no question about that) so we could have this fix musch faster.
<!--quoteo(post=2058492:date=Jan 9 2013, 02:06 PM:name=Wake)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Wake @ Jan 9 2013, 02:06 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=2058492"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->My guess is that it's more scarce to find 2 other buddies that have time to waste to mess up a server than 1. My other guess is that it is very simple to implement versus a ratio (wich is better, no question about that) so we could have this fix musch faster.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> It's already on a ratio, just a ridiculously low one. On 24p it takes 3 votes!
I'm pretty sure they made it anonymous because they were concerned that an upset commander would recycle all the IPs or something like that when they saw that a vote to kick them was in progress.
I'm pretty sure they made it anonymous because they were concerned that an upset commander would recycle all the IPs or something like that when they saw that a vote to kick them was in progress.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> Then keep it anonymous, but increase the vote percentage.
I just witnessed this abused again last night, this needs to be dealt with.
Happened again for many times, 2 guys in the Official EU #38 ejecting all the time everyone who tried to comm. till the server died. Got the 2 steamIDs if you need.
Comments
My guess is that it's more scarce to find 2 other buddies that have time to waste to mess up a server than 1.
My other guess is that it is very simple to implement versus a ratio (wich is better, no question about that) so we could have this fix musch faster.
* remove anonymous voting
* notify the team that a ejection vote is in progress
All problems solved. Would UWE do it? The answer is no...
I don't think I've seen a UWE member actually reply to stuff like this.
My other guess is that it is very simple to implement versus a ratio (wich is better, no question about that) so we could have this fix musch faster.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It's already on a ratio, just a ridiculously low one. On 24p it takes 3 votes!
I'm pretty sure they made it anonymous because they were concerned that an upset commander would recycle all the IPs or something like that when they saw that a vote to kick them was in progress.
I'm pretty sure they made it anonymous because they were concerned that an upset commander would recycle all the IPs or something like that when they saw that a vote to kick them was in progress.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Then keep it anonymous, but increase the vote percentage.
I just witnessed this abused again last night, this needs to be dealt with.