Intel E8400 @ 3.8GHz Abit IP35 Pro 8GB (4x2GB) G.Skill DDR2-1000 Corsair 620HX PSU Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit ATi Radeon 4870 512MB I average around 30 FPS during games.
I have a new EVGA GTX 570 coming Tuesday. I'll have to see how much better it is in NS2.
This thread is bait for an ATI vs nVidia flame war :P
NS2 is a Direct X 9 game that does not use complex tesselation. Therefore it is likely (But not certain) that at a particular pricepoint ATI cards will perform better than their more parrallel, tesselation munching Fermi brethern.
Anecdotally, my youtube videos are recorded on a 5870, and occasionally a GTS 450 - Both give me recordable fps with Fraps running. Good luck with your decision!
Don't think you can really say which is better in Spark without having someone with the same test system utilizing similar ATI card A and Nvidia card B. Right now what matters most is CPU speed. Crank a dual or quad core up, and you'll run the beta fine.
<!--quoteo(post=1817445:date=Dec 19 2010, 11:35 PM:name=thecowsaysmoo)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (thecowsaysmoo @ Dec 19 2010, 11:35 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1817445"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->if you have amd motherboard/cpu just get an ati card, if you have intel/intel mobo, get a nvidia.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> There has never been any real logic behind that pairing. You can mix and match all day long.
<!--quoteo(post=1817452:date=Dec 20 2010, 05:50 AM:name=WhiteZero)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (WhiteZero @ Dec 20 2010, 05:50 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1817452"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->There has never been any real logic behind that pairing. You can mix and match all day long.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think the logic goes that AMD owns ATI soooo.... better?
<!--quoteo(post=1817454:date=Dec 20 2010, 07:07 AM:name=Chris0132)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Chris0132 @ Dec 20 2010, 07:07 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1817454"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I think the logic goes that AMD owns ATI soooo.... better?
Yeah it kinda does fizzle out halfway through.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
normally you are right, but AMD has actually released some mobo's where the onboard ati chip can give a small boost to the pci-e card. The 890gx i believe. It's not a very impressive boost though.
as far as amd+amd or intel+nV goes, there's no difference with amd+nV or intel+amd
i would recommend choosing AMD cos they need the support, they are WAY behind Intel and a bit behind nV. the price per performance difference is negligible, if not better with AMD graphics, since they cannot compete with top performance, they can only compete with price.
<!--quoteo(post=1817409:date=Dec 20 2010, 04:09 AM:name=derWalter)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (derWalter @ Dec 20 2010, 04:09 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1817409"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->it looks like ati cards are performing much better than nvidia cards in ns2.
post your exact specs and fps you get with it pls!<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--quoteo(post=1817564:date=Dec 20 2010, 11:34 AM:name=VeNeM)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (VeNeM @ Dec 20 2010, 11:34 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1817564"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->gtx 570 Resolution 1280 x 1024<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--> Please tell me that isn't the resolution you use for all your games... Would be a terrible waste on that card.
<!--quoteo(post=1817580:date=Dec 20 2010, 02:41 PM:name=WhiteZero)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (WhiteZero @ Dec 20 2010, 02:41 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1817580"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Please tell me that isn't the resolution you use for all your games... Would be a terrible waste on that card.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--quoteo(post=1817580:date=Dec 20 2010, 11:41 AM:name=WhiteZero)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (WhiteZero @ Dec 20 2010, 11:41 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=1817580"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Please tell me that isn't the resolution you use for all your games... Would be a terrible waste on that card.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
lol actually i dont even remember what res i run (copy pasted from another post as his specs were close to my own), its higher than that though, i have a 25 inch monitor so you do the math. i wouldnt blame anyone for runnin ns2 in that res though but the game looks so good on high lol
Comments
Intel E6420 2.13Ghz @ 2.2Ghz
2Gb DDR 1100Mhz OCZ
Radeon HD4850 512Mb
1280x720 windowed at medium with shadows on
<b>FPS:</b> 18-30, with lag spike to 12
1280x720 windowed at ridiculously awful with shadows off
<b>FPS:</b> 20-32, with lag spike to 15
CPU is bottleneck it seems
GSkill 6gb 1600mhz
Ati Radeon 4870x2
Windows 7 64bit
1920x1200 high Avg: 42.123 - Min: 20
2560x1600 high Avg: 29.897 - Min: 17
tomorrow I'll do a crossfire of amd 6950
and tell you How Many fps
recently had the i7 930 to 4GHz
but as it gets very hot down to 3.52ghz
and changed a lot of fps
as they say it seems that this very limited by the cpu and not by the vga
Q6600 @ 3.4GHz with a HD5850, 1680x1050 on high - Rockdown 40fps average. 12 players = 20-30fps.
Abit IP35 Pro
8GB (4x2GB) G.Skill DDR2-1000
Corsair 620HX PSU
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
ATi Radeon 4870 512MB
I average around 30 FPS during games.
I have a new EVGA GTX 570 coming Tuesday. I'll have to see how much better it is in NS2.
NS2 is a Direct X 9 game that does not use complex tesselation. Therefore it is likely (But not certain) that at a particular pricepoint ATI cards will perform better than their more parrallel, tesselation munching Fermi brethern.
Anecdotally, my youtube videos are recorded on a 5870, and occasionally a GTS 450 - Both give me recordable fps with Fraps running. Good luck with your decision!
ATI Radeon 5770
4GB RAM
Windows 7 - 64 Bit
Resolution 1280 x 1024
High Quality
Did a few benchmark with Fraps.
1) LAN
I walked from marine start to marine start, always taking doors or hallways to my far right.
That should be the longest circular path possible.
<b>Rockdown</b>
Frames: 4003
Time (ms): 81384
Min: 18
Max: 63
Avg: 49.187
<b>Tram</b>
Frames: 4222
Time (ms): 106386
Min: 24
Max: 56
Avg: 39.686
2) Online
8 player game on Rockdown with structures, kills, death, lots of flamers.
Frames: 16226
Time (ms): 439826
Min: 9
Max: 95
Avg: 36.892
There has never been any real logic behind that pairing.
You can mix and match all day long.
You can mix and match all day long.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I think the logic goes that AMD owns ATI soooo.... better?
Yeah it kinda does fizzle out halfway through.
Yeah it kinda does fizzle out halfway through.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
normally you are right, but AMD has actually released some mobo's where the onboard ati chip can give a small boost to the pci-e card. The 890gx i believe. It's not a very impressive boost though.
as far as amd+amd or intel+nV goes, there's no difference with amd+nV or intel+amd
i would recommend choosing AMD cos they need the support,
they are WAY behind Intel and a bit behind nV.
the price per performance difference is negligible, if not better with AMD graphics,
since they cannot compete with top performance, they can only compete with price.
i recommend 6970 or 6950 depending on your budget
post your exact specs and fps you get with it pls!<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Its a Beta!
Argument over!
I get around 50fps at 1920x1080 max everything.
gtx 570
4GB RAM
Windows 7 - 64 Bit
Resolution 1280 x 1024
High Quality
runs good, waiting for the bottleneck to be lifted.
with all gpu settings in quality
and Avg: 34.433 - Min: 20 with morphological aa
the only bad thing is the bug of shadows flickering with crossfire
Resolution 1280 x 1024<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Please tell me that isn't the resolution you use for all your games...
Would be a terrible waste on that card.
Would be a terrible waste on that card.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
They'd run reeeeeeally well though XD
Would be a terrible waste on that card.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
lol actually i dont even remember what res i run (copy pasted from another post as his specs were close to my own), its higher than that though, i have a 25 inch monitor so you do the math. i wouldnt blame anyone for runnin ns2 in that res though but the game looks so good on high lol
12GB RAM
Nvidia GTX 470
Win 7 64bit
1920x1080 - Max Settings
I'm pulling 80-90fps in the ready room, averaging 50-60fps in first person and around 35fps in commander view.
4GB RAM
ATI Radeon HD5850 1GB
Win 7 x64
1680x1050 - Max. Details, 16xAF
Offline: 60FPS Average
Online (12ppl) : 30-50FPS
Online not really comparable because of the network/server issues.
Don't think the GPU manufacturer makes such a huge difference
Yes i got the GTX460 also works perfect