About The Semi-open Beta...

ForlornForlorn Join Date: 2002-11-01 Member: 2634Banned
<div class="IPBDescription">Post your thoughts here!</div> Since we can't post in the poll itself, I'm making a new thread right here.

My thoughts:

I think this would be a great idea!

I mean, even if you didn't join the constellation, you have to wait an additional what...? 3 more days? OH NOS! <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif'><!--endemo--> Who cares, it's not a big deal at all. At the same time, more people would have incentive to join the constellation program, and feel rewarded for doing so.

I was going to wait untill after 2.0 to join the constellation program, but now I may consider joining sooner! <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif'><!--endemo-->
«1345

Comments

  • WitherWither A Bugged Life Join Date: 2002-12-24 Member: 11513Members, NS1 Playtester, Contributor, Constellation
    I'm already a constellation member but I'll gladly pay extra if it means I could play NS a few days early, and of course anything to help the devs/community <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • coilcoil Amateur pirate. Professional monkey. All pance. Join Date: 2002-04-12 Member: 424Members, NS1 Playtester, Contributor
    I am not certain, but I doubt this is meant to be for Constellation members. It would more likely be for members of one of the many subscription-based computer gaming networks on the Internet - e.g. Gamespy, Gamespot, etc. That's not official word; that's my personal interpretation of Flayra's original post.

    I am all for it, but then I'm a playtester. ^^
  • MausMaus Join Date: 2002-11-03 Member: 5599Members
    Looks like I was all elite and got my reply in Indiana Jones-style before they were stopped, but I have to post this pic, of how the NS community really helps Flayra make decisions:
  • TorgoTorgo Join Date: 2002-12-30 Member: 11626Members
    Yeah, it sounds like a pretty good idea. It would give a chance to see what the average person does to the game.
  • HazeHaze O RLY? Join Date: 2003-07-07 Member: 18018Members, Constellation
    I'm all for it, but I went too fast and clicked 'both good and bad' on accident... boo. <!--emo&:(--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/sad.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='sad.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • MagiTekMagiTek Join Date: 2002-11-02 Member: 5057Members
    If it would help make 2.0 more balanced for its official release, I'm all for it.

    I suspect that one of the main points of this test would be to see how the adjusted skulk toughness affects the average pubber. If the starting units are imbalanced on pubs and one side keeps getting creamed, new players might get too discouraged and never give NS a chance. First impressions are very important, so it's absolutely critical that this aspect be fun on launch day.
  • ForlornForlorn Join Date: 2002-11-01 Member: 2634Banned
    <!--QuoteBegin--Maus+Jul 21 2003, 07:31 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Maus @ Jul 21 2003, 07:31 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Looks like I was all elite and got my reply in Indiana Jones-style before they were stopped, but I have to post this pic, of how the NS community really helps Flayra make decisions: <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    ROFL!

    Hey, you are being a little impatient with the poll aren't you there buddy?
  • Umbraed_MonkeyUmbraed_Monkey Join Date: 2002-11-25 Member: 9922Members
    I doubt this would help balance the game any...it sounds more like a PR thing. In that case, if its for Constellation Members, sure, anything to get the devs some more money <!--emo&;)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink.gif'><!--endemo--> However, if its the way coil described it, I would be less enthusiastic.../me hates those buggers.


    The big question is, how would Flayra prevent this semi-open beta from leaking out to a open beta? (WonID of constellation members?) If it cannot be done, is there a point?
  • TorgoTorgo Join Date: 2002-12-30 Member: 11626Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--Umbraed Monkey+Jul 21 2003, 07:40 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Umbraed Monkey @ Jul 21 2003, 07:40 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I doubt this would help balance the game any...it sounds more like a PR thing. In that case, if its for Constellation Members, sure, anything to get the devs some more money <!--emo&;)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink.gif'><!--endemo--> However, if its the way coil described it, I would be less enthusiastic.../me hates those buggers.


    The big question is, how would Flayra prevent this semi-open beta from leaking out to a open beta? (WonID of constellation members?) If it cannot be done, is there a point? <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    I'm pretty confident that they have a plan that works if this proceeds...
  • ForlornForlorn Join Date: 2002-11-01 Member: 2634Banned
    <!--QuoteBegin--coil+Jul 21 2003, 07:31 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (coil @ Jul 21 2003, 07:31 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I am not certain, but I doubt this is meant to be for Constellation members. It would more likely be for members of one of the many subscription-based computer gaming networks on the Internet - e.g. Gamespy, Gamespot, etc. That's not official word; that's my personal interpretation of Flayra's original post.

    I am all for it, but then I'm a playtester. ^^ <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Hmm... Why in god's name would Flay use any other operation besides his own? If it was gamespy or something, how would that promote himself at all?
  • MagiTekMagiTek Join Date: 2002-11-02 Member: 5057Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--coil+Jul 21 2003, 11:31 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (coil @ Jul 21 2003, 11:31 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I am not certain, but I doubt this is meant to be for Constellation members. It would more likely be for members of one of the many subscription-based computer gaming networks on the Internet - e.g. Gamespy, Gamespot, etc. That's not official word; that's my personal interpretation of Flayra's original post. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    I'm curious, how did you come to that conclusion? If one of the goals of this semi-open beta would be to generate income, then why go through some middleman? The money that Constellation members donate goes straight to the devs' pockets.

    Do you think that Gamespy, Fileshack, etc. would pay considerable cash to have an NS 2.0 exclusive?
  • X_StickmanX_Stickman Not good enough for a custom title. Join Date: 2003-04-15 Member: 15533Members, Constellation
    Personally, I don't think i'd pay to play something i can play for free in a few more days. Maybe if i was paying to be in the 2.1 beta....

    (plus, if NS had anything to do with Gamespy or Fileplanet, i would be ticked off to say the least. I really don't like the whole ideals of those particular companies)
  • MausMaus Join Date: 2002-11-03 Member: 5599Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--X_Stickman+Jul 22 2003, 12:50 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (X_Stickman @ Jul 22 2003, 12:50 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> (plus, if NS had anything to do with Gamespy or Fileplanet, i would be ticked off to say the least. I really don't like the whole ideals of those particular companies) <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    ... in which case the poll is misleading. The "paid members of a certain service" is vague as all hell. Since there are good "certain services" (ie constellation) and bad services (gamespy/fileplanet) then peoples' answers are gompletely dependant on their interpretation of the question, and not at all consistent/objective, really. To put it more clearly - not everyone is answering the same question.
  • ForlornForlorn Join Date: 2002-11-01 Member: 2634Banned
    If this is for constellation, I'd say yes. For anything else, I'd say hell no.
  • X_StickmanX_Stickman Not good enough for a custom title. Join Date: 2003-04-15 Member: 15533Members, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin--Maus+Jul 21 2003, 11:57 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Maus @ Jul 21 2003, 11:57 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--X_Stickman+Jul 22 2003, 12:50 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (X_Stickman @ Jul 22 2003, 12:50 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> (plus, if NS had anything to do with Gamespy or Fileplanet, i would be ticked off to say the least. I really don't like the whole ideals of those particular companies) <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    ... in which case the poll is misleading. The "paid members of a certain service" is vague as all hell. Since there are good "certain services" (ie constellation) and bad services (gamespy/fileplanet) then peoples' answers are gompletely dependant on their interpretation of the question, and not at all consistent/objective, really. To put it more clearly - not everyone is answering the same question. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    sorry, what i meant to say was:

    I am not willing to pay to play, when i can wait 2-3 days to play for free. I just don't have the money to spare (i'm 15, and my acount goes towards paying for EVE-Online (me and a friend) and saving for a new computer). I am a member of constellation however.

    My point about Gamespy and fileplanet... I meant <b>if</b> it had anything to do with them. I've hated Gamespy for a long time now, since they took over most of the old free-games-related-download sites.
  • MagiTekMagiTek Join Date: 2002-11-02 Member: 5057Members
    edited July 2003
    <!--QuoteBegin--MagiTek+Jul 21 2003, 11:46 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (MagiTek @ Jul 21 2003, 11:46 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin--coil+Jul 21 2003, 11:31 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (coil @ Jul 21 2003, 11:31 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I am not certain, but I doubt this is meant to be for Constellation members.  It would more likely be for members of one of the many subscription-based computer gaming networks on the Internet - e.g. Gamespy, Gamespot, etc.  That's not official word; that's my personal interpretation of Flayra's original post. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    I'm curious, how did you come to that conclusion? If one of the goals of this semi-open beta would be to generate income, then why go through some middleman? The money that Constellation members donate goes straight to the devs' pockets.

    Do you think that Gamespy, Fileshack, etc. would pay considerable cash to have an NS 2.0 exclusive?<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Actually, after talking with other people, I realize you're probably right. More important than straight income would be exposure for NS 2.0, and that would be better served by working through Fileplanet or similar.

    Perhaps a good compromise would be to allow the beta to be accessed by both "Service X" and Constellation? It would allow us a preview of what happens when you put complete newbies in with "veteran" NS pubbers. Not just in the interest of balance -- the newbies will need guidance on how to play or else they may get confused and discouraged. Frankly, NS just isn't very fun when no one understands how to play the game.
  • JazzXJazzX cl_labelmaps ∞ Join Date: 2002-11-19 Member: 9285Members, Retired Developer, NS1 Playtester
    When I first read the poll I assumed, like Forlorn did, that "only be open to paid members of a certain service" was a reference to Constellation. As such I said I thought it sounded like a great idea and voted: "Yes! Anything to help the devs and community!" However after reading Coil's post (and after reading Flayra's original post again) I'm also inclined to believe it is not a reference to Constellation and as such I have far more mixed feelings about the idea.

    Looking at it objectively I think you have to conclude that distributing NS 2.0 through one of the paid subscriber sites is a <b>great</b> idea. It would distrubute the game to a playerbase that plays lots of games, otherwise why would you subscribe to one of the services? And as a general rule these are gamers who have the means and motivation that could help spread the word to other players faster than anything else.

    However the idea really bugs me on a personal level, as someone who spends hours upon hours playing the game every week, and spends even more time on activities related to NS. Stuff like hanging out with other players in IRC, reading forum posts, dissecting changelogs for my own forums, and helping other players play the game. The idea that a group of gamers that don't do this stuff would be able to play 2.0 before me is aggravating on a purely selfish level.

    Mixed feelings indeed, as it makes tons of sense and could be very benefitial to both the community and the game, but it would upset me. For myself I think the benefits would outweigh the costs and say go for it. <b>However</b> I have a feeling that I'm in a minority, among players in a similar situation, in my overall conclusion.
  • cr3amcr3am Join Date: 2002-11-05 Member: 7221Members
    IMHO, you guys need as many days as possible to code. If there's a small glitch or anything, you really should get it quickly done before releasing it. I would not like it to come out until it is fully complete...
  • MavericMaveric Join Date: 2002-08-07 Member: 1101Members
    edited July 2003
    A huge private PR blitz partay, if i ever saw one.
    Chalk another one up for the "No, but i'd get over it" choice.

    [-edit- isn't a beta a un-finished version of the final product? Alpha > Beta > Release. I dont see why <b>i</b> would possibly put out a game that has bugs and vulnerable code... prolly make people think "Wow, this is some bad netcode and buggy play!" <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/confused.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused.gif'><!--endemo--> GG public beta.]
  • AutumnTwilightAutumnTwilight Join Date: 2002-08-27 Member: 1244Members, Constellation
    I think it could be quite helpful to have some non-Vet/Playtesters get a try at things. Nothing against them, but as I mentioned in another post awhile back, this would help to ensure that NS 2.0 really *has* been balanced for both clan and public play, instead of Clan(Vet) play and very good players (Playtesters).

    I have been informed previously that the playtesters run the whole range of skill, but just as opening it up to Vets gave the Developers a breath of fresh air and opinion, I think this could do much the same, and catch some issues that might otherwise go unnoticed.

    Then again, it would help immensely if these semi-beta people were given to rational feedback and suggestions, versus screams of "Lame!", etc...

    To sum it up, it isn't likely to give a whole lot of time for suggestions or improvements, but it could help catch some obvious (in retrospect) errors. I'm speaking hypothetically, of course.

    Finally, if it brings in more money to the people that make it all happen, or helps them in any way, I am all for it. <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif'><!--endemo-->

    Twilight
  • AutumnTwilightAutumnTwilight Join Date: 2002-08-27 Member: 1244Members, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin--Maveric+Jul 21 2003, 06:38 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Maveric @ Jul 21 2003, 06:38 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> [-edit- isn't a beta a un-finished version of the final product? Alpha > Beta > Release. I dont see why <b>i</b> would possibly put out a game that has bugs and vulnerable code... prolly make people think "Wow, this is some bad netcode and buggy play!" <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/confused.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused.gif'><!--endemo--> GG public beta.] <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Umm, yes, but if this Beta is released to certain people only a few days before the planned release, it is likely to closely reflect the finished product.

    If there was "bad netcode and buggy play" in the game only two or three days before release, it was going to encounter problems anyway, or Flayra was really waiting for the last minute to fix major errors.

    Twilight
  • ZERGZERG Join Date: 2003-02-04 Member: 13132Members, Constellation
    I don't really see the point... I'd rather have it now.
  • Bosnian_CowboyBosnian_Cowboy Join Date: 2003-06-07 Member: 17088Members, Constellation
    I bust my **** posting my ideas here without gaining anything and some twelve year-old chump can get money from his parents to be a constellation member and play NS 2.0 before me? Hell no!

    Am I going to have to sell my body so I can become a constellation member? I hope not. Whatever, I'll find some way to pay.
  • coilcoil Amateur pirate. Professional monkey. All pance. Join Date: 2002-04-12 Member: 424Members, NS1 Playtester, Contributor
    edited July 2003
    <b>Disclaimer: I have not been able to speak with Flayra about whether he means Gamespy/similar or Constellation. This is my own personal opinion.</b>

    Here's the truth, guys: whether or not the public beta happens, NS will release on the 31st. The beta would occur BEFORE this - i.e. probably Mon-Thurs of that week.

    The rationale behind a public beta is an *excellent* one - a few days of MASSIVE testing, on a much larger scale than the PTs/Vets can produce, to see if there are any unforseen bugs that are found by sheer volume of players.

    Flay's not asking you if you would pay to have it early - as I suspect many of you might. He's more asking if you'd be upset if NS 2.0 were opened up a few days early to a select group which might or might not include you. If that group is the Constellation group, then anyone who hasn't donated to Constellation is out of luck. If that group were an established service like Gamespy, anyone whe didn't have a Gamespy Complete would be out of luck.

    In *both* scenarios, anyone who was willing to pony up a few bucks for a membership *would* have access to the pre-release beta. Anyone who didn't would receive 2.0 on the 31st, just as they would if the beta never happened.

    Many of you dislike the idea because services like Gamespy are "evil"... well, it's time for a wake-up call: the Internet isn't free. Gamespy and services like it offer a valuable commodity to the world, and in a capitalist market they have every right to charge for that commodity.

    If NS released early on Gamespy or something like it, the following would happen:
    1) Any gamespy members would get early access to bugtest NS 2.0
    <b>2) Any non-members would get access to 2.0 on the 31st, as promised.</b>
    3) The final version of 2.0, released on the 31st, would be a more stable and balanced version than would have otherwise been possible without a beta test.
    4) NS would get a huge amount of publicity, generating a much larger fanbase - not even only among service subscribers, but among free service users who see "NS 2.0 available to Gamespy Complete members!" or something like that.

    The life of any mod/game is its player base. A pre-release beta to a specific service generates additional interest. Furthermore, it serves to create a more stable, more balanced, more PLAYABLE final release which will better appeal to players and keep them playing it.

    Final analysis:<b>
    You, as NS players, have NOTHING to lose from a pre-release beta, whether or not you are involved. You will get NS 2.0 as promised on the 31st, and you will get a more stable, more balanced build to boot. So please put aside your "me-first" and "Corporations are evil" attitudes, and help Flayra do what's best for Natural Selection.</b>
  • devicenulldevicenull Join Date: 2003-04-30 Member: 15967Members, NS2 Playtester, Squad Five Blue
    edited July 2003
    Edit: removed something after reading above post


    What about the servers?
    Where exactly are they going to play if the server isnt released untill the 30th
    What if no (or few) server ops want to switch versions, or are not members of the said group.
    Will the server be released to all before??
  • BattousaixBattousaix Join Date: 2002-06-25 Member: 822Members
    edited July 2003
    if its for constellation, i say yes...... if not......... no way....... (<b>please don't work around the swear filter</b>)

    I never liked this idea of paying to get a game a week earlier.......... im seriously against it
  • BattousaixBattousaix Join Date: 2002-06-25 Member: 822Members
    edited July 2003
    Coil, Its about something called fans
    i think its totally unfair to release the so awaited ns 2.0 version to totally strangers because we can get more publicity, i mean, its not a moral thing to me..... i believe it sounds ok for you guys, but for me........ i would feel betrayed...
  • BlaqWolfBlaqWolf Join Date: 2002-10-28 Member: 1667Members
    money really makes the world go round doesn't it? doesn't matter if you've been watching this whole NS project since it started....

    damn my lack of funds. damn it to hell....

    <!--emo&::asrifle::--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/asrifle.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='asrifle.gif'><!--endemo--> $$$
  • SettlerSettler Join Date: 2003-02-13 Member: 13504Members, Constellation
    I would feel a bit 'betrayed' if they released it 3 or 4 days early to say, Gamespy, but i would get over it. In the end either way im getting it o the 31st, bottom line. wow 4 days, who really cares <!--emo&:)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif'><!--endemo-->

    This isnt to say that i would give a leg or foot to get it early... (no arms, need those to play it!!)
  • Sephiroth2kSephiroth2k Join Date: 2002-04-21 Member: 481Members, Constellation
    hmm sounds retty good even though im a cheapskate and don't buy anything... (i have no money anyways...) maybe you could open it to people that registered before.. oh, i don't know... april 22nd 2002 or so...
Sign In or Register to comment.