Starship Troopers

HazeHaze O RLY? Join Date: 2003-07-07 Member: 18018Members, Constellation
<div class="IPBDescription">OMGz~!!!1!11111!!!1!!!</div> Alright I just finished watching Starship Troopers. And gawd damn, that movie blew my socks off!! All the alien fighting, and when the guys were holding the buggies off at the outpost and then the little plane came and picked them up..man it was so cool. And the guy that was holding the nuke talking down the bug brain and totally smack talking his arse, and then the dude got stabbed in the back and nuked the place himself OMG!!! COOL!!!

But the whole time I was thinking of...NS..the movie..

Bigger, better, and uncut!
«1

Comments

  • BizZy_9mm_MessiahBizZy_9mm_Messiah Old School Member Join Date: 2003-07-25 Member: 18411Members, Constellation
    The part I love was when they showed the first battle with the Marines and Bugs and that one guy who was like hispanic or something was like You want sooome!! AHHH then the aliens friggin gang banged his **** and rips his limbs off. He got messed up totally.
  • DubersDubers Pet Shop Boy Edinburgh, UK Join Date: 2002-07-25 Member: 998Members
    The most rounds ever in any movie production were fired in the making of starship troopers. Oh and there was talk of a sequal ages ago so does anyone know whats going on?

    p.s. The only good bug is a dead bug!
  • BizZy_9mm_MessiahBizZy_9mm_Messiah Old School Member Join Date: 2003-07-25 Member: 18411Members, Constellation
    I feel sorry for the cow who had to deal with the arachnid. And that fat brain thing reminded me of a gorge that **** you off but you can't get to him because of the army of fades, lerk, an onos outside.
  • TestamentTestament Join Date: 2002-11-02 Member: 4037Members
    The SST series was -awesome-.

    It was a CG TV series...I used to watch it constantly.
  • ZigZig ...I am Captain Planet&#33; Join Date: 2002-10-23 Member: 1576Members
    what a great, great movie.
  • esunaesuna Rock Bottom Join Date: 2003-04-03 Member: 15175Members, Constellation
    As good as Starship Troopers is, don't be roped in by "Roughnecks", the POS spin-off cartoon, it has the worst writing and dialogue ever, poor acting (Yes, even for CG), apalling animation and you are guarenteed to feel ripped off, even if you only rented it. Avoid at all costs.
  • CommunistWithAGunCommunistWithAGun Local Propaganda Guy Join Date: 2003-04-30 Member: 15953Members
    Everyone loves this movie for all the wrong reasons.
  • AlcapwnAlcapwn &quot;War is the science of destruction&quot; - John Abbot Join Date: 2003-06-21 Member: 17590Members
    movie was awsome <!--emo&;)--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/wink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='wink.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • NuketheplaceNuketheplace Join Date: 2002-09-02 Member: 1266Members
    Commie we all know about the idea that earth is a fascist state and all that, but look at the guns and all the killing. Thats what makes this a good movie. That reminds me I should rent it some day. The only time I saw it was on a crappy T.V movie by fox.
  • LikuLiku I, am the Somberlain. Join Date: 2003-01-10 Member: 12128Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--Testament+Jan 10 2004, 09:38 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Testament @ Jan 10 2004, 09:38 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> The SST series was -awesome-.

    It was a CG TV series...I used to watch it constantly. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Hell's yes. The Movie was awesome too.
  • ZigZig ...I am Captain Planet&#33; Join Date: 2002-10-23 Member: 1576Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--CommunistWithAGun+Jan 11 2004, 04:47 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (CommunistWithAGun @ Jan 11 2004, 04:47 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Everyone loves this movie for all the wrong reasons. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    cwaggar the horrible, you are indeed horrible.

    nuketheplace is right. the neo-world governmental system is NOT the prevailing theme of the movie. super alien bugs and lots of assault rifle action IS the prevailing theme of the movie. for its time, the CG was SPECTACULAR, and still impresses me. it's a great action movie and is loved primarily for that reason.


    basically it's NOT effective as "a profound and thought-provoking piece opening viewers' eyes to the wonders of fascism".

    just guns and shootin. >]
  • HazeHaze O RLY? Join Date: 2003-07-07 Member: 18018Members, Constellation
    i felt sorry for the cow. i'm gonna make a spoof of that where the cow kicks the aliens arse. that would kick man.



    the dumbest and most obvious part of the entire movie was near the end when they captured the brain bug. my god. the guys like "hes afriad...hes AFRAID!!" well no **** there is obviously 10,000 soldiers more staring him in the face with guns, he cant move his fat **** if he ****en life depended on it his little roach friends wouldnt be there, and hes probably ten times smarter than you or me. DO YOU THINK HES AFRAID? REALLY?
  • 2of12B0RG2of12B0RG Join Date: 2002-12-21 Member: 11285Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--CommunistWithAGun+Jan 10 2004, 11:47 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (CommunistWithAGun @ Jan 10 2004, 11:47 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Everyone loves this movie for all the wrong reasons. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Man, come on.... this movie has guns, explosions, and even boobs.

    What more does a man ask for in a movie?
  • NuketheplaceNuketheplace Join Date: 2002-09-02 Member: 1266Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--2of12[B0RG]+Jan 10 2004, 09:23 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (2of12[B0RG] @ Jan 10 2004, 09:23 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--CommunistWithAGun+Jan 10 2004, 11:47 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (CommunistWithAGun @ Jan 10 2004, 11:47 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Everyone loves this movie for all the wrong reasons. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Man, come on.... this movie has guns, explosions, and even boobs.

    What more does a man ask for in a movie? <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    Exactly if you want insight into fascism read the book. If you want lots of people blowing stuff watch the movie.
  • torquetorque Join Date: 2003-08-20 Member: 20035Members, NS1 Playtester, Constellation
    CWAG: I wouldn't say the 'wrong' reasons, just not the reasons that the original author wouldn't have liked. I imagine the same thing applies to Battle Royale, a Japanese film with sort of the same idea behind it.
  • DubersDubers Pet Shop Boy Edinburgh, UK Join Date: 2002-07-25 Member: 998Members
    What I never understood about the film was in real life when an army goes to war it will airstrik the crap out of the battlefield, pound it with artillary then send in troops with heavy armour support. WHERE WERE THE TANKS?!?! And there was like one airstrike in the whole film. Insanity.
  • BizZy_9mm_MessiahBizZy_9mm_Messiah Old School Member Join Date: 2003-07-25 Member: 18411Members, Constellation
    edited January 2004
    <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Posted on Jan 11 2004, 01:25 AM
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    What I never understood about the film was in real life when an army goes to war it will airstrik the crap out of the battlefield, pound it with artillary then send in troops with heavy armour support. WHERE WERE THE TANKS?!?! And there was like one airstrike in the whole film. Insanity.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    That is what I was saying to myself. But then aren't the Marines the first to fight? Yea they could've used tanks though, the way the Marines were getting their arms handed to them. I mean cmon, if the aliens are going to send a huge friggin meteor and completely devastate one place. Why not do the same and nuke their behinds?
  • DubersDubers Pet Shop Boy Edinburgh, UK Join Date: 2002-07-25 Member: 998Members
    Also sending in troops is a really inefficient way of killing swarms of giant bugs. Realistically they would have nuked the crap out of all the bug planets then sent in people to clear out the caves.
  • BizZy_9mm_MessiahBizZy_9mm_Messiah Old School Member Join Date: 2003-07-25 Member: 18411Members, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->DuBERS Posted on Jan 11 2004, 01:54 AM
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Also sending in troops is a really inefficient way of killing swarms of giant bugs. Realistically they would have nuked the crap out of all the bug planets then sent in people to clear out the caves.  <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    I know that's what I was saying.

    <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->2of12[B0RG] Posted on Jan 11 2004, 12:23 AM
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    QUOTE (CommunistWithAGun @ Jan 10 2004, 11:47 PM)
    Everyone loves this movie for all the wrong reasons. 

    Man, come on.... this movie has guns, explosions, and even boobs.

    What more does a man ask for in a movie?  <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    Can't argue with that though. <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif'><!--endemo-->
  • SuperTeflonSuperTeflon Join Date: 2003-12-31 Member: 24893Banned
    edited January 2004
    <!--QuoteBegin--2of12[B0RG]+Jan 11 2004, 12:23 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (2of12[B0RG] @ Jan 11 2004, 12:23 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> What more does a man ask for in a movie? <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    A freaking plot that doesn't make me crack up?

    Acting that doesn't suck?

    A cover to the movie that looks somewhat better then an MSPaint job?

    A smidgeon of something that would make any sense whatsoever? For **** sakes these thumbless 'bugs' have somehow NATURALLY EVOLVED the capability to leave a planets atmosphere and survive in space, find a large asteroid without telescopes or anything, somehow find some way to PROPELL the asteroid, calculate the exact velocity and angle with which to send it smashing it into Buenos Aries without anyone freaking SEEING IT COMING, and the humans can't even drop a few thousand nukes (The real kind, not that popgun crap in the movie) on the planet without some massive wad of bug **** wiping out half the fleet.
  • pieceofsoappieceofsoap Join Date: 2002-11-21 Member: 9535Members, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin--BizZy | 9mm Messiah+Jan 11 2004, 01:31 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (BizZy | 9mm Messiah @ Jan 11 2004, 01:31 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Posted on Jan 11 2004, 01:25 AM
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    What I never understood about the film was in real life when an army goes to war it will airstrik the crap out of the battlefield, pound it with artillary then send in troops with heavy armour support. WHERE WERE THE TANKS?!?! And there was like one airstrike in the whole film. Insanity.<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->

    That is what I was saying to myself. But then aren't the Marines the first to fight? Yea they could've used tanks though, the way the Marines were getting their arms handed to them. I mean cmon, if the aliens are going to send a huge friggin meteor and completely devastate one place. Why not do the same and nuke their behinds? <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    The movie was cool. The book is better. Far better.

    Where are the tanks? They dont use tanks, they use Powered Armor. In the movie, you see soldiers running around with big bulletproof vests and assault rifles. This isnt how they went in. The Mobile Infantry goes in prepared, using suits of powered armor dropped from orbit. Each Infantryman is heavily armed, In the first 20 pages of the book you find out that the main character carries all of the following at once:
    Hand Flamer
    Y rack (works like a mortar)
    Heavy Flamer
    HE Bombs
    A Rocket Launcher with Nuclear warheads
    "Fire Pills" (Incindiary grenades I believe)
    And other assorted explosives.

    Not unprepared, light armor minipeople. In NS Terms, think HA with Jetpacks, and all the armament you can think of.

    As to why they dont airstrike the crap out of the target planet/battlefield before they send in the troops? Because the enemy is underground. They could pound the surface of a planet to a radioactive glass, and still not get any kills.

    The movie is pretty, the book is what you should have spent your time on.
  • SuperTeflonSuperTeflon Join Date: 2003-12-31 Member: 24893Banned
    edited January 2004
    <!--QuoteBegin--pieceofsoap+Jan 11 2004, 03:50 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (pieceofsoap @ Jan 11 2004, 03:50 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> As to why they dont airstrike the crap out of the target planet/battlefield before they send in the troops?  Because the enemy is underground. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    <img src='http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1590000/images/_1593734_bunker_buster2_300.gif' border='0' alt='user posted image'>

    BTW can someone explain the logic and theory behind the 'hand-held nuclear warheads' in both the book and the movie? Critical mass is 10 pounds of plutonium the size of a grapefruit, and that's minus the high explosives encasing it, as well as the computer timing system. Assuming you did construct the smallest possible nuke that:

    1) Didn't weigh nearly a ton itself.

    2) Didn't release so much gamma radiation it sterelizes the marine before he even picks it up.

    and

    3) Didn't cost a fortune to manufacture.

    ...the smallest blast you'd get from critical mass (10 pounds) of plutonium would be in the neighborhood of 0.75 to 1.5 kilotons (1,500,000 to 3,000,000 pounds of explosive force, depending on purity and percentage of successful fission) on a successful fission reaction (a fizzle would be around 150-400 tons) To give you some perspective, the MOAB has less then 25,000 pounds of explosive force, and that's enough to blow tanks over.

    Firing it into a sand-and-dirt burrow wouldn't shelter you at all. And assuming by some miracle this 60,000 degree fireball didn't immolate you and your squad, there's this invisible force called 'radiation' that's probably going to kill you sooner rather then later. A sand-and-dirt burrow would produce so much radioactive particulate sand, you'd have massive fibrosis and internal hemmoraging into your lungs in a few hours.
  • TestamentTestament Join Date: 2002-11-02 Member: 4037Members
    <!--QuoteBegin--esuna+Jan 11 2004, 04:47 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (esuna @ Jan 11 2004, 04:47 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> As good as Starship Troopers is, don't be roped in by "Roughnecks", the POS spin-off cartoon, it has the worst writing and dialogue ever, poor acting (Yes, even for CG), apalling animation and you are guarenteed to feel ripped off, even if you only rented it. Avoid at all costs. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    I liked Roughnecks. Thought the movie was complete poop. Haven't bothered to read the book.
  • BizZy_9mm_MessiahBizZy_9mm_Messiah Old School Member Join Date: 2003-07-25 Member: 18411Members, Constellation
    <!--QuoteBegin--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> </td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->Posted on Jan 11 2004, 04:00 AM
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    QUOTE (pieceofsoap @ Jan 11 2004, 03:50 AM)
    As to why they dont airstrike the crap out of the target planet/battlefield before they send in the troops?  Because the enemy is underground. 



    BTW can someone explain the logic and theory behind the 'hand-held nuclear warheads' in both the book and the movie? Critical mass is 10 pounds of plutonium the size of a grapefruit, and that's minus the high explosives encasing it, as well as the computer timing system. Assuming you did construct the smallest possible nuke that:

    1) Didn't weigh nearly a ton itself.

    2) Didn't release so much gamma radiation it sterelizes the marine before he even picks it up.

    and

    3) Didn't cost a fortune to manufacture.

    ...the smallest blast you'd get from critical mass (10 pounds) of plutonium would be in the neighborhood of 0.75 to 1.5 kilotons (1,500,000 to 3,000,000 pounds of explosive force, depending on purity and percentage of successful fission) on a successful fission reaction (a fizzle would be around 150-400 tons) To give you some perspective, the MOAB has less then 25,000 pounds of explosive force, and that's enough to blow tanks over.

    Firing it into a sand-and-dirt burrow wouldn't shelter you at all. And assuming by some miracle this 60,000 degree fireball didn't immolate you and your squad, there's this invisible force called 'radiation' that's probably going to kill you sooner rather then later. A sand-and-dirt burrow would produce so much radioactive particulate sand, you'd have massive fibrosis and internal hemmoraging into your lungs in a few hours. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->


    HOLY ****! How the hell do you have so much knowledge on this stuff?
  • BeRzErKeRBeRzErKeR Join Date: 2003-02-18 Member: 13691Members
    edited January 2004
    I've been on the internet for long enough not to bother wondering anymore.

    Edit: Oh, and SST pwns. You just have to disable your brain and enjoy the action.
  • Aries8Aries8 Join Date: 2002-12-12 Member: 10719Members
    I love this movie to, but I dont think it deserves the name "Startship troopers". It is nothing like the book isnt only resemblance between the two are the names of some of the characters. It should of just been called something else. I suggest reading the book, its not long at all. Alot of the book talks about Ricos training and the military state that they live in(its more interesting then it sounds) along with the fighting.
  • MulletMullet Join Date: 2003-04-28 Member: 15910Members, Constellation
    Besides all the kick **** alien fighting....

    Denise Richards.....mmmmmmmmmm
  • BizZy_9mm_MessiahBizZy_9mm_Messiah Old School Member Join Date: 2003-07-25 Member: 18411Members, Constellation
    That big brain alien...mmmm...uh ehem Denise richards..mmmmmm
  • Nemesis_ZeroNemesis_Zero Old European Join Date: 2002-01-25 Member: 75Members, Retired Developer, NS1 Playtester, Constellation
    I zapped through TV yesterday night and accidentally got to watch it. For the first ten minutes, I was convinced it was the parody of a cheesy sci fi flick, only to realize that it was indeed simply a <i>very</i> cheesy sci fi flick.

    Sorry folks, but even leaving the abonimable background out, the production values were low (as in 'hit rock bottom and started drilling to get deeper'), meaning that any kind of believable atmosphere was destroyed by the laughable look of the outifts and environments (Just look at that body armor - couldn't they at least have painted the plastic so it looks a little less like a childs toy?). The dialogues were bland, the action came from the school of 'bigger is better' which I had hoped went into extinction at the end of the 80s, the plots message was too stupidly presented even for the liking of a die hard anti-warer like myself, and the actings quality rivals only Tomb Raiders 'performances'.
    And the oh so great CG? Yeah, I understand it was something special when the movie came first out, but we're in 2004. I'm just not impressed by worse animations than I could've seen in a computer game anymore.

    All in all, my quick review is "Belgh.".
  • MulletMullet Join Date: 2003-04-28 Member: 15910Members, Constellation
    edited January 2004
    <!--QuoteBegin--Nemesis Zero+Jan 11 2004, 05:18 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Nemesis Zero @ Jan 11 2004, 05:18 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I zapped through TV yesterday night and accidentally got to watch it. For the first ten minutes, I was convinced it was the parody of a cheesy sci fi flick, only to realize that it was indeed simply a <i>very</i> cheesy sci fi flick.

    Sorry folks, but even leaving the abonimable background out, the production values were low (as in 'hit rock bottom and started drilling to get deeper'), meaning that any kind of believable atmosphere was destroyed by the laughable look of the outifts and environments (Just look at that body armor - couldn't they at least have painted the plastic so it looks a little less like a childs toy?). The dialogues were bland, the action came from the school of 'bigger is better' which I had hoped went into extinction at the end of the 80s, the plots message was too stupidly presented even for the liking of a die hard anti-warer like myself, and the actings quality rivals only Tomb Raiders 'performances'.
    And the oh so great CG? Yeah, I understand it was something special when the movie came first out, but we're in 2004. I'm just not impressed by worse animations than I could've seen in a computer game anymore.

    All in all, my quick review is "Belgh.". <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><span class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    I couldnt agree with you more (that it's a cheesey movie), but you must admit that some of the fighting scenes just kick total ****. Maybe it's just me but no matter how corny a movie is, a good fight scene or two is always good. And plus, there are boobies in the movie! +10 for that.
Sign In or Register to comment.