[mcon] Lantern-pierce P72a3

13»

Comments

  • Owen1Owen1 Join Date: 2003-04-13 Member: 15457Members
    <!--QuoteBegin-BrigadierWolf+May 3 2004, 05:55 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (BrigadierWolf @ May 3 2004, 05:55 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I dont think it needs to be any longer than it already is....

    Anyway, Ejection ports are almost never directly above the magazine, they are usually located behind the firing chamber. this is because the bullet will move backward with the slide after firing, If you want to see an ejection port thats located behind the magazine, look at any HK rifle. they are all designed this way. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
    quite right... and yet people have a go at me when my concepts do that... for shame on them
  • rabbityrabbity Join Date: 2003-07-02 Member: 17866Members
    <img src='http://www.hkpro.com/image/g3old.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
    its slightly shorter because the catridge doesnt have the bullet, but still, its above the magazine, not behind it
  • sheena_yanaisheena_yanai Join Date: 2002-12-23 Member: 11426Members
    edited May 2004
    <!--QuoteBegin-|Owen|+May 3 2004, 03:45 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (|Owen| @ May 3 2004, 03:45 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-BrigadierWolf+May 3 2004, 05:55 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (BrigadierWolf @ May 3 2004, 05:55 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> I dont think it needs to be any longer than it already is....

    Anyway, Ejection ports are almost never directly above the magazine, they are usually located behind the firing chamber. this is because the bullet will move backward with the slide after firing, If you want to see an ejection port thats located behind the magazine, look at any HK rifle. they are all designed this way. <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    quite right... and yet people have a go at me when my concepts do that... for shame on them <!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd-->
    because pistols and rifles are apples and beans...

    i will not comment the function on brigs concept, because we know now its programmed like that...

    on a pistol is the moving part the slide=external,the ejection port is moving.. on a rifle is the moving part the receiver=internal , the ejection port is static.
    do you see the opposite configuration?

    on a pistol with external slide the round is always moving exactly inside of the ejection port. i dont want to explain this again why and how... but a fact is on a pistol with moving slide the ejection port have to be on the location where the firing chamber is, the chamber is covering the ejection port. on the reload position the slide with the ejection port moves back, and gives you a nice look on the magazineclamps, and the next round that gets loadet..

    the mauser pistol on the pic 6john6doe6 have posted was primary designed as small calibre semi automatic carbine.. you can change the barrel , and add a buttstock.. so its principe is a rifle one.. no moving slider. static external receiver housing, internal moving receiver.this pistol does not have a slider, and if i can remember it right it got no double action, you have to **** the hammer for the first shot.

    on a rifle it is different.
    the receiver mechanism itself is covering the ejection port.when the rifle extracts the empty casing from the barrel , it moves back till it reaches the ejection port right over the magazine, because when it stops, and the round gets ejected, the receiver takes on the way back to the front the next round with him.
    it would be not very clever to make the ejection port on a rifle behind the magazine.... this slows down the reload mechanism because the receiver moves a unusual long way.
    it would be something different on a heavy recoil loader weapon, with a recoilbrake, but this weapon would be no assault rifle with its slow rate of fire.. thats more common with large caliber anti material rifles, because their receivers mostly movin a long way anyways
  • rabbityrabbity Join Date: 2003-07-02 Member: 17866Members
  • MuzzleflashMuzzleflash Join Date: 2004-04-09 Member: 27806Members
    wolf did u skin those revolvers urself?if ub did, can u get them converted?im lefty so try flip if u want to do it for me
  • BurncycleBurncycle Join Date: 2002-11-24 Member: 9759Members, NS1 Playtester
    edited May 2004
    I don't think it would function in reality, at least the original concept, However that's just semantics; this isn't reality, the weapon looks good, so who am I to argue? If I don't like it, I simply won't use it.
  • Malici0usMalici0us Join Date: 2004-04-14 Member: 27923Members
    Man this guy makes one topic and he gets rided like a **** by every person to read it <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html//emoticons/confused.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused.gif' /><!--endemo-->
  • -Drake--Drake- -dn ʎɐʍ sıɥʇ- Join Date: 2003-04-02 Member: 15125Members
    Yes i donno how many times i have had this convo bout weapon concepts not being usable in real life :B
  • Malici0usMalici0us Join Date: 2004-04-14 Member: 27923Members
    edited May 2004
    <span style='color:red'>Nuked</span>

    who cares of the weapon works or not its a freaking concept its not going to exist in real life and frankly im glad it doesnt!

    along with just about everything else in ns... especialy skulks.
Sign In or Register to comment.