Ok, I'm now voting for <b>I'm_Lost</b> because no one has voted for him yet and he's probably feeling left out <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/biggrin-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
<!--QuoteBegin-CMEast+May 31 2005, 04:34 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (CMEast @ May 31 2005, 04:34 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Ok, I'm now voting for <b>I'm_Lost</b> because no one has voted for him yet and he's probably feeling left out <!--emo&:D--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/biggrin-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
STC as always. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> Not that I care at this point, but why would you change from one person with only one vote to another, without making an accusation? It obviously isn't a threat to me, but there doesn't seem to be any reason behind it, other than possibly postcount++ (which TWG seems to be great for).
Well it looks like I was too accusing in my attack on MuffinMan. I really don't think he's a wolf, but he just seemed suspicious at the time. I guess this is what I get for being so offensive so early on. Although I guess it won't matter if I get voted off. I don't have a special role and there are plenty of humans, but just to be safe, I'll change my vote to <b>SaltzBad</b>. (I have nothing against you and I may change it later any way)
Just to make things clear, I admit that it does sound like I was saying "TheMuffinMan is a wolf because of this and Petco is guilty for following his plan. Trust me because I'm smart." And at the time I didn't think it sounded that way, but the way I wrote it sounded like I was proving it. I'll stop now or I'll become too defensive >_<.
<!--QuoteBegin-Condizzle+May 31 2005, 06:56 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (Condizzle @ May 31 2005, 06:56 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->...I'll change my vote to <b>SaltzBad</b>. (I have nothing against you and I may change it later any way)<!--QuoteEnd--></td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'><!--QuoteEEnd--> Of <i>course</i> you'll change it, even though that means you would be almost certain to be voted out.
<!--QuoteBegin-im lost+May 31 2005, 09:18 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td><b>QUOTE</b> (im lost @ May 31 2005, 09:18 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin--> Of <i>course</i> you'll change it, even though that means you would be almost certain to be voted out. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd--> With 18 hours left there's plenty of time for votes to change. If I don't have to have my vote on him to save my ****, then I'll change it.
Hey hey hey, I didn't mean to vote for yourself, I suggested voting for someone who doesn't have a change of going out. Vote for me if you don't know where to put it but don't commit suicide <!--emo&???--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/confused-fix.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='confused-fix.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Unless the wolves back off it won't get to a stage where people with two votes will be in danger so I won't mind.
I'm tempted to vote for SaltzBad again to get us equal and give me a chance, but I'll take CMEast's advice and vote for someone with few votes. I'm probably going to die anyway though. I'll vote for <b>Comprox</b>.
I'd still guess that everyone with more than a couple votes is human, and that the wolf votes are widely distributed... The wolves don't have to move this early, since they're unlikely to be targeted on day one except by dumb luck.
Chances are, barring an early slip-up, the wolves are laying low with 0-2 votes each.
Of course, in the words of Dennis Miller... "But that's just my opinion. I could be wrong"
I'd like to take Xentor's point. In every game, a human is voted off first, barring a huge slip up. The wolves lay low while the humans look suspicious. I admit that I looked very suspicious in my attack on MuffinMan, and I became extremely suspicious when I started my wild vote changes. I really have nothing to defend myself with besides admitting that I dug a hole for myself this game.
I'll have to agree with both Xentor and Condizzle. The wolves are quite happy that we're accusing each other, so they don't need to start making any moves. In fact, their best move is to lay quiet and watch for the first few days.
However, I'll also like to point out that we still have a wildcard in the game: the psychopath. To me, the psychopath is the most threat. If we take out the psychopath, the number of players dying at night decrease by half, allowing us to win.
(More to come, rather post this now since my internet is screwy)
The reasoning behind my last post was simple. The results of a person voting for themself are never good. It reduces discussion, and no one learns anything if someone kills themself. Condizzle changed his vote, and lots of other people responded to what happened, so I got what I wanted. It seems like Condizzle is going to die, apparently he doesn't have a role, so it won't be too big a loss if he dies.
There are 20 minutes left. I was going to keep my plan secret, but I have no choice. If there are at least 3 people who trust me, (2 if one of them is voting for me), we could put votes on ZeroByte and perhaps keep me in the game. It all comes down to trust, and as I see it, only im_lost, Thansal, MuffinMan, and Comprox have any amount of trust that I am a human. I hate to put pressure on you, but you'll have to decide quickly whether or not you trust me.
Comments
Essentially, the targetted person dies, and either the wolf or psychopath dies.
Link is provided here:
<a href='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=93627' target='_blank'>Go check Sky's version.</a>
STC as always.
STC as always. <!--QuoteEnd--> </td></tr></table><div class='postcolor'> <!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not that I care at this point, but why would you change from one person with only one vote to another, without making an accusation? It obviously isn't a threat to me, but there doesn't seem to be any reason behind it, other than possibly postcount++ (which TWG seems to be great for).
Condizzle - 5 (Petco, brute_force, I'm_lost, TheMuffinMan, Gwahir)
SaltzBad - 4 (Cheetah, Legionnaired, Comprox, EMP Demon)
TheMuffinMan - 3 (Cyndane, Quaunaut, Condizzle)
ZeroByte - 2 (Mouse, Mantrid)
Breakthrough - 1 (ZeroByte)
Quaunaut - 1 (Pulse)
Theslan - 1 (Xentor)
Comprox - 1 (Breakthrough)
Cheetah - 1 (SaltzBad)
im lost - 1 (CMEast)
CMEast - 1 (Theslan)
T - 18 hours until day's over.
Condizzle - 5 (Petco, brute_force, I'm_lost, TheMuffinMan, Gwahir)
SaltzBad - 5 (Cheetah, Legionnaired, Comprox, EMP Demon, Condizzle)
TheMuffinMan - 2 (Cyndane, Quaunaut)
ZeroByte - 2 (Mouse, Mantrid)
Breakthrough - 1 (ZeroByte)
Quaunaut - 1 (Pulse)
Theslan - 1 (Xentor)
Comprox - 1 (Breakthrough)
Cheetah - 1 (SaltzBad)
im lost - 1 (CMEast)
CMEast - 1 (Theslan)
Of <i>course</i> you'll change it, even though that means you would be almost certain to be voted out.
With 18 hours left there's plenty of time for votes to change. If I don't have to have my vote on him to save my ****, then I'll change it.
The only people that would keep those votes up like that are the wolves (of which there are bound to be a few in there) who want saltzbad gone.
Unless the wolves back off it won't get to a stage where people with two votes will be in danger so I won't mind.
Current votes:
Condizzle - 5 (Petco, brute_force, Condizzle, TheMuffinMan, Gwahir)
SaltzBad - 4 (Cheetah, Legionnaired, Comprox, EMP Demon)
TheMuffinMan - 2 (Cyndane, Quaunaut)
ZeroByte - 2 (Mouse, Mantrid)
Breakthrough - 1 (ZeroByte)
Quaunaut - 1 (Pulse)
Theslan - 1 (Xentor)
Comprox - 1 (Breakthrough)
Cheetah - 1 (SaltzBad)
im lost - 1 (CMEast)
CMEast - 1 (Theslan)
Mantrid - 1 (im lost)
Aha! <!--emo&:p--><img src='http://www.unknownworlds.com/forums/html/emoticons/tounge.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='tounge.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Chances are, barring an early slip-up, the wolves are laying low with 0-2 votes each.
Of course, in the words of Dennis Miller... "But that's just my opinion. I could be wrong"
<b>Condizzle</b> is just tripping all over the place trying to save himself and I'm lost. That's far more suspicious than Saltz.
Vote changed to <b>Condizzle.</b>
Current votes:
Condizzle - 6 (Petco, brute_force, Legionnaired, TheMuffinMan, Gwahir, Comprox)
SaltzBad - 2 (Cheetah, EMP Demon)
ZeroByte - 2 (Mouse, Mantrid)
Comprox - 2 (Breakthrough, Condizzle)
TheMuffinMan - 1 (Quaunaut)
Breakthrough - 1 (ZeroByte)
Quaunaut - 1 (Pulse)
Theslan - 1 (Xentor)
Cheetah - 1 (SaltzBad)
im lost - 1 (CMEast)
CMEast - 1 (Theslan)
Mantrid - 1 (im lost)
EMP Demon - 1 (Cyndane)
(Woohoo! More vote changing!)
However, I'll also like to point out that we still have a wildcard in the game: the psychopath. To me, the psychopath is the most threat. If we take out the psychopath, the number of players dying at night decrease by half, allowing us to win.
(More to come, rather post this now since my internet is screwy)
Definition of laying quiet:
1) posted only votes.
2) posted only 1 to 2 times in the forums.
2. Comprox
3. EMP Demon
10. Breakthrough
11. Mouse
13. Cyndane
14. Legionnaired
17. Mantrid
18. SaltzBad
20. Cheetah
Remember, communication is good. It means network. It means we have a better chance of winning.
If there are at least 3 people who trust me, (2 if one of them is voting for me), we could put votes on ZeroByte and perhaps keep me in the game. It all comes down to trust, and as I see it, only im_lost, Thansal, MuffinMan, and Comprox have any amount of trust that I am a human. I hate to put pressure on you, but you'll have to decide quickly whether or not you trust me.